4.0/40 rejected everywhere :o( Not sure what to do?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
thanks @Inventor of Post-Its that was what I was trying to get across. Lets be honest, you dont do much volunteering at a hospital. you cant do much regadless of how long you've been there because of liability issues. You may be able clean out beds, stock supplies, run errands, and maybe interact with patients or guests at a very minimal level. When I think of what is defined as clinical experience, I think of experiences where you have cared or treated an individual. But thats just my mindset.

I don't know, LizzyM's advice about categorizing clinical activities is "if you're close enough to smell the patients, then it's clinical contact". The majority of what I do when I volunteer at the hospital is transport patients to and from various departments, and I would consider than clinical volunteering. I don't think there are many experiences out there that would allow you to care or treat for anyone because, like you said, we're not qualified.

Edit: Whoops, seems like mehc012 beat me to it 😛
 
In the ER, I go and talk with the patients while they're waiting for labs / imaging to come back...plus I did CNA activities, as I got my CNA license a few years ago... At the other hospital, I would help the patients with their discharge planning, ensuring they had adequate support and follow up care plans
Okay, sounds good, I wasnt trying to be anal, but many times applicants think they meet qualifications in certain areas and they overlook details
 
Initially applied and took MCAT 2011/2012 and just didn't fill out secondaries...took my second MCAT 2014 and reapplied 2014/2015
You did interview at your state school the first time around. Last fall:
Thanks for the kind words. The last time I applied, I only completed my application to my state school (submitted a secondary) because my MCAT was significantly lower. I got an interview, but it didn't go so well. My interviewer asked me the most bizarre questions, like if I enjoyed shadow puppetry? It was very strange.
This might not be something you like remembering, but every detail makes a difference when we are trying to understand where you're at and how to help you.
 
This might not be something you like remembering, but every detail makes a difference when we are trying to understand where you're at and how to help you.
for all the schools that I applied to this year, either I had never applied or had never filled out a secondary.
 
Last edited:
She's been rejected from literally 3/4 of the top 25.

Yep, and I'm saying that the 1/4 she didn't apply to are the schools that would have accepted her. (Specifically, US News 7-13, plus UPenn, WashU, etc.)

Look, if I had applied to only the schools OP applied to, I'd be making this exact thread right now, and people would be telling me I need a complete application overhaul, or I need to aim lower. The only reason I'm not is because I applied to the right schools. These schools are the top-25 schools that OP just happened to skip over in her application. This is simply a stroke of bad luck, because you never know which schools are a good fit until you apply.

I still think that aiming too low is a waste of money. Schools are not going to spend resources interviewing students whom they know are overqualified, and whom they know would go elsewhere. That was my experience this application cycle. I spent a lot of money applying to schools below my LizzyM "just in case", and this didn't provide any sort of safety net. If you look at OP's record, you'll see the same thing. Harvard, Yale, and Duke offered her an interview, while Northwestern, Wake Forest, and Georgetown did not.
 
Um, I can smell patients from sitting in front of a sign in sheet in the ER.... but to each its own. And no one said you had to be a doctor but MANY applicants work as EMTs, CNAs, Patient Care Techs, etc. So its very realistic
Yes, yes you can smell them helping out in the waiting room at an ED. Thus, that would qualify. And the saying isn't mine, it's from an adcom at a top med school (LizzyM) and is referenced by the other adcoms on this site frequently. It's pretty much the first response by anyone on this site when discussing how 'clinical' an experience is.

Yes, you can be an EMT or a CNA, or even a nurse, but it's not required. Many, many applicants get their clinical experience simply through volunteering at hospitals.

In the ER, I go and talk with the patients while they're waiting for labs / imaging to come back...plus I did CNA activities, as I got my CNA license a few years ago... At the other hospital, I would help the patients with their discharge planning, ensuring they had adequate support and follow up care plans

And there we go, no need for further discussion...even by your more-rigorous-than-usual standards, this qualifies as truly clinical. So it doesn't seem like their issue is an utter lack of clinical exposure.
 
Yes, this was the first time around and I didn't apply to my state school again this time because I really don't want to go to that school. But for all the other schools that I applied to the first time around I never filled out a secondary for.
If that makes sense... so for all the schools that I applied to this year, either I had never applied or had never filled out a secondary.
Were you accepted to your state school? This seems like something you obviously should have mentioned by now, but you do seem to have been withholding some fairly significant information up to this point.
 
I'm not seeing the big mystery. The title of this thread is extremely misleading.

It pretty much comes down to this:

-Reapplicant
-Small application pool
-Minimal clinical experience
-Minimal clinical volunteering (Just lots of time in a hospital as a volunteer)
-Minimal, if any, altruistic volunteering
-Average 34 MCAT (28 retaken to 40)
~8 years removed from HS (And nothing to really show for it)

OP I'm not trying to be harsh, but there's nothing that really sets you apart from any other applicants. Your 40 MCAT caught my eye, but that was quickly diminished with the lower score. There's nothing else that jumps out and really makes you a great candidate. You have average ECs. I'm not saying you have to be this extraordinary applicant to get into medical school, but for your school list, there needs to be an improvement. I think you would have had success at mid-low tier MD and definitely DO.
 
Were you accepted to your state school? This seems like something you obviously should have mentioned by now, but you do seem to have been withholding some fairly significant information up to this point.
No. I was not accepted to my state school, and all the other places I applied to the first time around I never filled out secondaries for.
 
Last edited:
That fact that you got so many pre-II rejections says your personal statement was poor and beyond GPA/MCAT, aka numbers, there is lots lacking. You'll definitely get into medical school when you fix these things so, don't let that get you down. I would also work on talking with a smile and go into an interview being asked anything. There are no such thing as weird questions only inappropriate answers. You have to take every question as being a test and respond charismatically. If you have any ties to Texas I would recommend submitting to TMDSAS next time, your states are more then okay for OOS plus who doesn't love $16000 medical school tuition. Good luck!
 
BTW, I agree with mimelim. There is obviously something that is a major red flag if 12/15 schools auto-reject you. Call every single school and try to get some info.
OP didn't say anything about "auto-rejections." A pre-interview rejection in itself doesn't indicate a problem with an application.

Edit: If the issue is the number of pre-interview rejections itself, look at my application. I have a higher LizzyM than OP and I got rejected pre-interview at over half the schools I applied to. I have none of the applicant issues OP has (first time applicant, one MCAT attempt, broad EC's, etc...)
 
That fact that you got so many pre-II rejections says your personal statement was poor and beyond GPA/MCAT, aka numbers, there is lots lacking. You'll definitely get into medical school when you fix these things so, don't let that get you down. I would also work on talking with a smile and go into an interview being asked anything. There are no such thing as weird questions only inappropriate answers. You have to take every question as being a test and respond charismatically. If you have any ties to Texas I would recommend submitting to TMDSAS next time, your states are more then okay for OOS plus who doesn't love $16000 medical school tuition. Good luck!
Where do you draw the line for the number of pre-interview rejections that justify this assumption?
 
It pretty much comes down to this:

-Reapplicant
-Small application pool
-Minimal clinical experience
-Minimal clinical volunteering (Just lots of time in a hospital as a volunteer)
-Minimal, if any, altruistic volunteering
-Average 34 MCAT (28 retaken to 40)
~8 years removed from HS (And nothing to really show for it)
I agree that these are the factors in play. The last bullet is interesting--OP, you've been working in research, and obviously you've been in college. Have there been any gaps where you were occupied less than full-time, or maybe not doing anything?
OP I'm not trying to be harsh, but there's nothing that really sets you apart from any other applicants.
I'd just like to note the irony of this statement next to your signature.
"Comparison is the thief of joy." --Theodore Roosevelt
 
I agree that these are the factors in play. The last bullet is interesting--OP, you've been working in research, and obviously you've been in college. Have there been any gaps where you were occupied less than full-time, or maybe not doing anything?

I'd just like to note the irony of this statement next to your signature.

Yes, I graduated college and then I took a year to travel. This in retrospect might have been a big mistake. Then from 2012/2013 I was a volunteer research assistant (25 hr/week) and also volunteered at two hospitals 10/15 hours/week total... I spent a large chunk of time 3/6 months studying for the MCAT as well... But moving forward, for this upcoming year, does anyone have any suggestion on whether they think it would be best to focus on getting a masters / more research. I'm definitely going to look for more community service opportunities, but any ideas on what to focus more heavily on schooling/research

I guess I'm just looking for insight. There have been individuals who have had fantastic application cycles, and I thought they might be able to share some advice regarding what they did to be more appealing to medical schools, outside of the obvious. If I knew how best to improve I would start today, but I'm just not sure what would be best. Do you think it causes concern to have been out school for so long? That's why I thought a masters might help?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I graduated college in 2011 and then I took a year to travel. This in retrospect might have been a big mistake. Then from 2012/2013 I was a volunteer research assistant (25 hr/week) and also volunteered at two hospitals 10/15 hours/week total... I spent a large chunk of time 3/6 months studying for the MCAT as well... But moving forward, for this upcoming year, does anyone have any suggestion on whether they think it would be best to focus on getting a masters / more research. I'm definitely going to look for more community service opportunities, but any ideas on what to focus more heavily on schooling/research
Getting in more community service is definitely good, but I would advise you not to make any big decisions about what to focus on until you've spoken to admissions officers of at least one or two schools you applied to. We can try to give you advice based on what you've told us, but ultimately they are the only ones who have seen all your activities, your personal statement, your secondaries, etc. and can tell you what you could do differently to be accepted. I would hate for you to go off in one direction only to find out in May that that wasn't the problem with your application at all.
 
I'm not seeing the big mystery. The title of this thread is extremely misleading.

It pretty much comes down to this:

-Reapplicant
-Small application pool
-Minimal clinical experience
-Minimal clinical volunteering (Just lots of time in a hospital as a volunteer)
-Minimal, if any, altruistic volunteering
-Average 34 MCAT (28 retaken to 40)
~8 years removed from HS (And nothing to really show for it)

OP I'm not trying to be harsh, but there's nothing that really sets you apart from any other applicants. Your 40 MCAT caught my eye, but that was quickly diminished with the lower score. There's nothing else that jumps out and really makes you a great candidate. You have average ECs. I'm not saying you have to be this extraordinary applicant to get into medical school, but for your school list, there needs to be an improvement. I think you would have had success at mid-low tier MD and definitely DO.
How is 800hrs of volunteering with direct patient contact and some undeniably clinical duties (CNA work) 'minimal clinical volunteering' and thus 'minimal clinical experience'?
 
I'd just like to note the irony of this statement next to your signature.

Comparison in the eyes of the applicant and in the eyes of the adcom are much different. 🙂

Yes, I graduated college in 2011 and then I took a year to travel. This in retrospect might have been a big mistake. Then from 2012/2013 I was a volunteer research assistant (25 hr/week) and also volunteered at two hospitals 10/15 hours/week total... I spent a large chunk of time 3/6 months studying for the MCAT as well... But moving forward, for this upcoming year, does anyone have any suggestion on whether they think it would be best to focus on getting a masters / more research. I'm definitely going to look for more community service opportunities, but any ideas on what to focus more heavily on schooling/research

Clinical experience and community service could stand to be improved. I don't know that more research is going to be a defining factor given that is probably the strongest portion of your application. You need to figure out what prompted all of the pre-II rejections, because that is unusual. That's going to require an in-depth look at every aspect of your application.
 
Yes, I graduated college in 2011 and then I took a year to travel. This in retrospect might have been a big mistake. Then from 2012/2013 I was a volunteer research assistant (25 hr/week) and also volunteered at two hospitals 10/15 hours/week total... I spent a large chunk of time 3/6 months studying for the MCAT as well... But moving forward, for this upcoming year, does anyone have any suggestion on whether they think it would be best to focus on getting a masters / more research. I'm definitely going to look for more community service opportunities, but any ideas on what to focus more heavily on schooling/research
You have all the right pieces, maybe it's just the way you're putting them together. I think an application has to stand out more if there's some unifying theme that connects the applicant's different pursuits. Say you're really interested in reproductive rights, you can do research for an OB/GYN, volunteer at Planned Parenthood, write articles about current legislative issues, organize fundraisers, etc. etc. Find something you're passionate about and pursue the crap out of it. I guarantee you'll stand out more if it looks like you're doing things because you truly care about them, not just to tick boxes.
 
Getting in more community service is definitely good, but I would advise you not to make any big decisions about what to focus on until you've spoken to admissions officers of at least one or two schools you applied to. We can try to give you advice based on what you've told us, but ultimately they are the only ones who have seen all your activities, your personal statement, your secondaries, etc. and can tell you what you could do differently to be accepted. I would hate for you to go off in one direction only to find out in May that that wasn't the problem with your application at all.
Sounds like good advice, I will try contacting them. Most have policies stating that they cannot offer feedback to individual applicants, but maybe they'll overlook them
 
Missed the CNA part.
Let me rephrase: Adequate clinical experience (although amount is still unknown)
The CNA duties were as a part of the hospital volunteering...and the rest of their description of their volunteer work was also undeniably clinical in nature. They have 800hrs of clinical volunteering. That's not the problem here.
I'm not saying that what they've got will make up for other deficiencies in their app, but simply that clinical exposure/volunteering is not in itself what is lacking. They've got far more than me, and not a single person on here has ever even slightly suggested that I need more.

Perhaps they'd benefit from other clinical activies such as shadowing a variety of specialties, etc, get some more diversity in there?
 
The concern to me is that it kind of just looks like you haven't been doing much with your life. That sounds judgmental but I'm trying to look at this as if I were looking at an application. You've been out of college for several years, and the most ambitious thing you've done is a part time volunteer research assistant...
That was my reaction too.
OP, do you have a job? Have you done anything for money since graduating from college?
 
The concern to me is that it kind of just looks like you haven't been doing much with your life. That sounds judgmental but I'm trying to look at this as if I were looking at an application. You've been out of college for several years, and the most ambitious thing you've done is a part time volunteer research assistant...
I have to agree...I think that spending time travelling was a big mistake... there's basically a year of nothing in my application, which probably doesn't look inspiring. For being out of college 3 years, other than research, volunteering, and taking sporadic graduate classes, I really haven't accomplished much...But, I still feel like I could be a good doctor and offer something of value to medical schools... But moving forward, assuming that the last three years of my life have been rather vanilla and uninspiring, is there something you would suggest I do in this interim year?
 
I have to agree...I think that spending time travelling was a big mistake... there's basically a year of nothing in my application, which probably doesn't look inspiring. For being out of college 3 years, other than research, volunteering, and taking sporadic graduate classes, I really haven't accomplished much...But, I still feel like I could be a good doctor and offer something of value to medical schools... But moving forward, assuming that the last three years of my life have been rather vanilla and uninspiring, is there something you would suggest I do in this interim year?
Do what you want to do. I'd recommend something where you are working full-time, given what you have described. Research, clinical work, an internship of some kind, something you're interested in.
 
The concern to me is that it kind of just looks like you haven't been doing much with your life. That sounds judgmental but I'm trying to look at this as if I were looking at an application. You've been out of college for several years, and the most ambitious thing you've done is a part time volunteer research assistant...

Yeah, I would agree with that as well. OP, you graduated college in 2011. It is now 2015. What do you have to show for that time?
 
No.. the research that I did was a internship position, so I was not paid... Then I went back to school to take molecular genetics/biochemistry graduate courses while continuing to volunteer at two hospitals...

? Research internships usually are paid.

Do something non-clinical that gives back to the community. I'd get a real, paying job for your own financial benefit too.
 
? Research internships usually are paid.

Do something non-clinical that gives back to the community. I'd get a real, paying job for your own financial benefit too.
More than just personal financial benefit - admissions committees might not be looking favorably on the fact that the applicant is in his/her mid to late 20s and has never supported him/herself financially. It shows a lack of responsibility and maturity.
 
Thanks y'all, I think your feedback has nailed it on the head. I guess if I were just fresh out of college, my application might be strong. But given that I'm 3 years out, committees expect more... I shall get busy doing what I can.
 
Last edited:
Thanks y'all, I think your feedback has nailed it on the head. I guess, if I were just fresh out of college, my application might be strong. But given that I'm 3 years out, committees expect more... I shall get busy doing what I can.

Good luck. With the right moves I think you'll find the third time to be the charm.
 
When did you get your 40? You don't want that to expire....
 
Sorry you are having such a rough go of it @flowerpower123. Two years worth of bad news can really bring you down.

I may be somewhat off base here, but I've been trying to read between the lines on some of your posts. First thing that many people have responded to is how the information in your life story has somewhat trickled out. Perhaps your own story in your personal statement lacks similar cohesiveness. It's also been pointed out that you had several years of not really doing anything. Maybe there was something in that time--an activity, an event, etc--that influenced the makeup of your persona so that it doesn't sound like you spent so much time doing nothing. We all have a fascinating story to tell, maybe you're just not telling yours in a compelling way? For example, you said you "wasted" a year travelling. I have spent a lot of time abroad and gleaned much from it, maybe you just need to adjust your own personal focus.

The second thing that I sort of suspect is that you might have come off as desperate or otherwise displeasing on interview day. I someone at an interview who had stats that blew mine out of the water and this person (a complete stranger) told me about how they had received fewer interviews than they expected and either rejections or wait lists after the interview. Every time I spoke with this person throughout the day it seemed that they were not approaching this process with the poise and positivism required. I know SDN is a safe space and being desperate/upset is OK here, but if you had even a hint of how (rightfully) concerned you are on interview day it might have been a turnoff.

Finally, the way you have addressed your activities in the past year--research assistant, so many hours hospital volunteer here and there--come off just a tad box-checkish. You don't come off as passionate for medicine other than you say you think you would be a good doctor. I said the same thing when I first started toward med school and basically got yelled at for 1. Presuming to be able to evaluate myself as such ("that's the job of an admission's committee, not you!") and 2. telling not showing.

TLDR version
Develop a cohesive, interesting story. Your application is the dust jacket on the book that is you. Make them want to read it (interview you).
Work on your interview skills/attitude, you may think you're fine but accidentally broadcasting something else with body language/offhand remarks
Plus same as what everyone else said: Apply more broadly, and have smart but vicious people rip your application to shreds before you apply.
Also, you've been asked but I didn't notice an answer--what was your turnaround time on secondaries? Pre-write those and get them brutally edited too.

Good luck. Third time could be the charm!
 
This has got to be one of the most frustrating help threads I've ever, ever seen. People who question OP's maturity are spot-on. She has no idea how to ask for help and prefers to reveal information a tiny piece at a time (I'm a reapplicant...oh I retook the MCAT..I graduated college 4 years ago...oh um I didn't really keep busy during that time...). The fact that people have to be nice enough to dig into your post history in order to try and help you is ridiculous. Why not lay out all of this in the first post? Why wait constantly for people to ask probing questions out of confusion before you offer up info? What/who are you saving all the information for, OP? The adcoms on your third app cycle?

It would take maybe five minutes of questioning by any functional adult to tease out the OP's immense immaturity. (lol she took some of mimelim/caffeinemia's comments as being hypercritical and discouraging? Seriously?) If she can't fix this part of her mentality, it won't matter what she does on paper for a third (!!!!!!!) cycle. It's an auto strike out at the interview if these attributes are even smelled, and the stench is pretty strong right now.

If I were OP, I'd start considering alternative careers instead of putting all the eggs in one basket for a third cycle. Harsh, but this is the sense I am getting.
 
flowerpower, have you spoken with your pre med adviser about what is wrong with your application? He/she will be most helpful if you have one. It reflects poorly on them/their school if they can't get you in. Ask them to be frank.
 
flowerpower, have you spoken with your pre med adviser about what is wrong with your application? He/she will be most helpful if you have one. It reflects poorly on them/their school if they can't get you in. Ask them to be frank.
She's not going to get better advice from a premed advisor, out of all people, than what she got here.
 
This has got to be one of the most frustrating help threads I've ever, ever seen. People who question OP's maturity are spot-on. She has no idea how to ask for help and prefers to reveal information a tiny piece at a time (I'm a reapplicant...oh I retook the MCAT..I graduated college 4 years ago...oh um I didn't really keep busy during that time...). The fact that people have to be nice enough to dig into your post history in order to try and help you is ridiculous. Why not lay out all of this in the first post? Why wait constantly for people to ask probing questions out of confusion before you offer up info? What/who are you saving all the information for, OP? The adcoms on your third app cycle?

It would take maybe five minutes of questioning by any functional adult to tease out the OP's immense immaturity. (lol she took some of mimelim/caffeinemia's comments as being hypercritical and discouraging? Seriously?) If she can't fix this part of her mentality, it won't matter what she does on paper for a third (!!!!!!!) cycle. It's an auto strike out at the interview if these attributes are even smelled, and the stench is pretty strong right now.

If I were OP, I'd start considering alternative careers instead of putting all the eggs in one basket for a third cycle. Harsh, but this is the sense I am getting.

The fact that the big picture wasn't revealed in the initial post was certainly frustrating, but I think it's a stretch to conclude that OP must be "immensely immature" from that. (And do I need to say it? Accusations of "immense immaturity" from someone named "poopydoody"?)

We also have no significant reason to believe that adcoms thought she was immature based on her application. Make no mistake---the mystery remains unsolved.
 
She's not going to get better advice from a premed advisor, out of all people, than what she got here.
I disagree.

Only her adviser will be able to read every line of her AMCAS and letters to pick out precisely what may be holding med schools back from offering an interview. It may be one glaring thing, it may be several small things, it may be a combination. To think that people over the internet, who have neither met flowerpower nor read any part of her application, can say more definitively what is wrong with her application than someone who has done both of these is ridiculous.
 
I really doubt that's it. A GED isn't a red flag.

Don't jump on me...because I wouldn't think that it's a big deal nearly a decade later. But I did drop out of high school, but I mean that was nearly 10 years ago and I graduated summa cum laude from college and I didn't even bring it up other than clicking GED on the AMCAS... I'm just trying to figure out what's wrong, maybe that's an issue

A couple of points -- A GED IS a red flag, but it's certainly one that can be overcome. Why did you drop out of high school? And then what did you do? Sometimes, an applicant's actions answer those questions so clearly they don't have to be asked. Other times, not. This OP didn't go straight to college and --

7 years post drop-out
1 year prior to college honestly didn't do much, just worked at a store
4.5 years of college / grad courses
2-3 years post college with research and volunteering

This doesn't inspire confidence, show drive & determination, etc. With both parents being doctors, financial hard luck seems unlikely. Honestly, there's more of a whiff of "aimless, entitled, adrift, can't get act together..." I would wonder and look for more clues.

4.5 years of college / grad courses
2-3 years post college with research and volunteering

OK - So it took a little bit longer to get through college - why? Post college grad research & volunteering -- Is this a paid research position? Full-time graduate school? Neither? Do you now have or have you ever had full time paid employment? (I'm still wondering about the privileged adrift angle...) Top medical schools are looking for future leaders in the field of medicine -- individuals who are driven and passionate, who will accomplish much. Again, judging only from what you've said here, I'm not getting that vibe.

The essay I wrote in my previous application several years ago (which I never completed secondaries for) discussed a struggle with anorexia in high school, but that was soo long ago and hasn't been an issue for nearly a decade.

I wonder if, upon seeing the 40 MCAT, many of these schools pulled the OP's original AMCAS application to see why s/he wasn't admitted the first time? That question would be near the forefront in my mind, so it doesn't seem implausible. Wonder if that played in -- Anorexia is a pretty serious deal, with some far-reaching behavioral implications. Perfectionism, self-critical, anxiety -- Does anyone know if the OP's original AMCAS PS would still be available?
 
He/she will be most helpful if you have one
Yes, I spoke with him, he is the chair of the biology department as well, and he wrote me a letter... I've been out of school for a while, but perhaps he'll still meet with me.
 
aimless, entitled, adrift, can't get act together..." I would wonder and look for more clues.
I think that this was definitely the case, initially, but I felt like I got my act together pretty quickly... But moving forward, I'm not sure whether it would be best to take two years to reapply, with a year of additional work/community service, or to reapply next year.

Why did you drop out of high school?
To receive treatment for aforementioned.

Anorexia is a pretty serious deal, with some far-reaching behavioral implications. Perfectionism, self-critical, anxiety
I know that this is true, but I feel like I've recognized these unfavorable qualities and have worked to overcome them... I would hope that having this issue in my youth would not exclude me from medicine later in life.
 
I think that this was definitely the case, initially, but I felt like I got my act together pretty quickly... But moving forward, I'm not sure whether it would be best to take two years to reapply, with a year of additional work/community service, or to reapply next year.


To receive treatment for aforementioned.


I know that this is true, but I feel like I've recognized these unfavorable qualities and have worked to overcome them... I would hope that having this issue in my youth would not exclude me from medicine later in life.

I hope they don't too --

OK, so now we seem to have a more cohesive story - one that makes sense. One that even illustrates how your "not knowing the answer" (with the 'know' italicized - I wondered about that) fits into your 28 -> 40 saga. Anxious, perfectionist, self-critical anorexic-even teen steps (falls? jumps?) off of the hamster wheel, gets treatment, recovers, re-starts slowly at first, then goes on to solidly good things. Travels the world (a potentially really good thing), starts a "wellness program" (anything to do with anorexia? And if not, why not?) --

This is meat you can work with, I think. Though admittedly, a high-risk strategy, as popular wisdom holds that med school admissions committees are not traditionally forgiving of mental health issues...

But you have the story of a journey --

How hard have you pushed yourself recently? Can you tolerate the pressure-cooker that is medical school? I would want to see two very demanding years' worth of something (my preference would be not grad school, or not only grad school) to reassure myself that you are completely healed and ready for something this demanding.
 
The moral of the story (from what i've read so far) -

1. Didn't apply to enough schools

2. Applied to all reach schools with no safeties (considering your prior MCAT score and re-applicant status)

3. Had average ECs with nothing really to stand out

4. Had a questionable personal statement +/- LORs

5. Might not be a strong interviewer


OP if you fix the above problems and reapply you should be fine.
 
"wellness program" (anything to do with anorexia? And if not, why not?) --
No...

But you have the story of a journey --
I'm very worried about the risk of this; everyone I've talked to (teachers, advisors) said they wouldn't share it. When I was initially oscillating between discussing it and not, one advisor strongly advised against it. Plus, I really don't want to be defined by this... I kind of want it to be a closed chapter.

How hard have you pushed yourself recently? Can you tolerate the pressure-cooker that is medical school? I would want to see two very demanding years' worth of something (my preference would be not grad school, or not only grad school) to reassure myself that you are completely healed and ready for something this demanding.
If I don't do grad school, what would you suggest instead? I was thinking about an MS in physiology while also doing community service. But if research or working would be better, I could definitely do that as well.
 
Last edited:
Top