A Suggestion for Mr. Rahm Emanuel

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

periopdoc

Cardiac Anesthesiologist
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
1,047
Tax revenue from the gun companies are probably so insignificant in the big scheme of Illinois tax collection... my guess is he couldn't care less given all the gun violence in Chicago.
 
I think it is hilarious that he believes state government has the authority to tell banks what types of legal businesses they are allowed to work with. He must have confused his role with that of a mob boss.
 
Speaking of Armalite...from here.




Thanks for posting this email. I just received a concerned telephone call about it, an email from the staffer who stimulated the mail.

I think a bit of clarification is in order.

The root of the matter is a HUGE series of inquiries by both email and telephone asking ArmaLite to cut off sales to New York and other states which deny its citizens the right to own our rifles, as several other firms have done. Some of the contacts have been duplicates of others and some were so redundant that they appeared to be spam. Many of them have been rude and I'm afraid one of my staffers thought that he was responding to a spammer and was more terse than he should have been. Once he realized what happened he came to me and apologized.

My purpose here is to pass on his apology from the corporate level and to answer the initial question: What is ArmaLite going to do?

ArmaLite is continuing a policy put into place when California first banned our rifles. That policy remains:

1. We will not sell to those states which deny it's honorable citizens the right to own ArmaLite's.

2. We do not halt sales to individual officers even in problematic states. I am a former Police Officer myself, and the staffer who stimulated the recent anger is a currently serving one. We are well familiar with the fact that most rifles serving Police Officers are purchased by the officers themselves, and that they shouldn't be punished for the actions of their political elite.

We consider sales to those sate subdivisions which are not engaged or potentially engaged with disarming its citizens. DNR and Forestry Departments, for instance, sometimes serve in remote areas that conceal drug farms and their officers deserve good hardware.

3. We will not sell to those lower political subdivisions that deny their honorable citizens the right to own ArmaLite's. Chicago, for instance, prohibits its citizens from owning ArmaLite's within the city limits so we make no effort to sell into that city. We have many friends on the Chicago Police Department and have continued to sell to them individually.

Our observation is that most County Sheriffs disagree with banning sales of our rifles and many publicly refuse to enforce such laws. We sell to those departments and to their Deputies, but will not sell to those County departments headed by Sheriffs who would deny their citizens the same rights.

In short, Americans need not worry that ArmaLite is selling to those who betray them.

As you can see by reading posts on the topic, some readers have been harsh with their criticism of ArmaLite. It was in response to this atmosphere that my staffer reacted harshly. He's come to me and apologized and I personally am passing my own apology along with his.

But don't be mistaken, ArmaLite is strongly involved with both personal, corporate, and political efforts at the State, National, and International level to protect our civil rights. And we'll continue to support your shooting needs as the situation moves forward.

Respectfully,

Mark Westrom
President,
ArmaLite Inc.
 
Very interesting stuff, but what does any of this have to do with Anesthesiology?
 
I'm sort of surprised those companies don't simply move to other states.

Magpul says they will pull out of Colorado if the magazine ban passes.

In addition to Armalite, there are a few others who are refusing to sell to ban states. Barrett started it. Recently LaRue and Olympic have stated they won't deal with states that ban. CheaperThanDirt (with their $100 Magpuls) have said the same. Hopefully others will follow. I'd love to see The Freedom Group take a stand.
 
Very interesting stuff, but what does any of this have to do with Anesthesiology?

Nothing at all. Apparently, after Sandyhook, while our medical school was sending out press releases urging gun control and highlighting loss of life and livelihood due to gun violence, SDN anesthesia was hosting a spirited discussion on which guns to buy before the man decides to ban all the guns and whether Sandy hook was a all a govt conspiracy to take away our guns. Also, something about the second amendment.
 
Nothing at all. Apparently, after Sandyhook, while our medical school was sending out press releases urging gun control and highlighting loss of life and livelihood due to gun violence, SDN anesthesia was hosting a spirited discussion on which guns to buy before the man decides to ban all the guns and whether Sandy hook was a all a govt conspiracy to take away our guns. Also, something about the second amendment.

Fair point. He probably would've turned his gun in had he realized he was breaking the law.
 
Nothing at all. Apparently, after Sandyhook, while our medical school was sending out press releases urging gun control and highlighting loss of life and livelihood due to gun violence, SDN anesthesia was hosting a spirited discussion on which guns to buy before the man decides to ban all the guns and whether Sandy hook was a all a govt conspiracy to take away our guns. Also, something about the second amendment.

Your medical school (assuming you're in detroit) must be pretty good at stopping gun violence because detroit is pretty safe right??
 
Magpul says they will pull out of Colorado if the magazine ban passes.

Saw that, good for them.

In addition to Armalite, there are a few others who are refusing to sell to ban states. Barrett started it. Recently LaRue and Olympic have stated they won't deal with states that ban. CheaperThanDirt (with their $100 Magpuls) have said the same. Hopefully others will follow. I'd love to see The Freedom Group take a stand.

Also nice to see.

(Never understood how CheaperThanDirt could possibly stay in business; their prices are comical even during normal times. Sucker born every minute I guess.)



These are the last gasps of the gun control movement.

Heller/McDonald forever took handgun bans off the table, nationwide.

Kachalsky is very likely to be granted cert at the Supreme Court, which means they could hear arguments later this year, with a decision possible by mid-2014. That will take may-issue and no-issue off the table forever, nationwide.

New York's recent 7-rnd magazine limit is a clear violation of Heller (which was fought over a 9-round handgun - how could NY lawmakers possibly screw that up?!?), and while it's unpleasant for NY residents, it's an absolute gift to those of us who want to see a magazine capacity case go before SCOTUS. I think in time that law will result in another win, and forever take magazine restrictions off the table, nationwide.

I'm less certain but still place extremely good odds of AWBs being taken off the table by SCOTUS within the next ~5 years. There's no way that a ban of the most common centerfire rifle in the US stands up to any level of scrutiny, given the "common use" wording in the Miller decision and Heller/McDonald affirmation of an individual right.

Provided the Heller 5 stay healthy a few more years, that is.


Of all the gun control talk lately, the huge glaring gap in it all is the absence of any attempts to ban handguns. Imagine a few years from now, when we have Heller-like protection of normal capacity magazines and semi-auto rifles.

In 10 or 15 years, maybe we can start to chip away at the abomination that is the NFA. Well, maybe that's a bit too optimistic. 🙂


Delicious, delicious irony. If the gun-grabbers weren't trying so hard to push such restrictive laws through so soon, they wouldn't be handing such great cases to us to take before a pro-2A court. These are good times for us to be going to court. We are winning.
 
The rush to pass these laws will be their death knell.

The over-reach is even beginning to strike at the civil liberties sensibilities of our most liberal friends.

From Danny Westneat, Seattle Times.

Misstep in gun bill could defeat the effort - One of the major gun-control efforts in Olympia this session calls for the sheriff to (annually and without a warrant) inspect the homes of assault-weapon owners. The bill’s backers say that was a mistake.

They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder... I’m a liberal Democrat — I’ve voted for only one Republican in my life, but now I understand why my right-wing opponents worry about having to fight a government takeover... It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the arms of the NRA.

I have been blasting the NRA for its paranoia in the gun-control debate. But Palmer is right — you can’t fully blame them, when cops going door-to-door shows up in legislation

I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.

The prime sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search provision in his own bill

I am in support of these jokers authoring the most egregious laws possible, and I hope that Feinstein gets her AWB solidly attached to any bill that comes out of the Senate this year.

- pod
 
Top