Hi Everyone,
Many of my friends have failed this exam this year and I thought I would write a few words on what helped me to pass. I thought this years exam was indeed difficult. I graduated from residency in 2010 however I did not take the boards during my first year of fellowship due to my wedding/honeymoon. So I was definitely nervous about being 1 year removed from internal medicine. However, being a nephrology fellow does not allow you to forget internal medicine.
Knowing that I was 1 year out of training required more of an effort on my part. I see that a lot of people mention review classes in their blogs. I was never the type to get much from a lecturer and my attention would have indeed waxed and waned throughout the day. I knew that a review course was out. From what I hear about these course, they are known to be high yield for focused studying. However, I have friends who have taken these classes and have not passed.
In order to pass this test you have to have a mastery of some primary reading source. I would pick either MKSAP or medstudy. I used medstudy and I found that all my board questions were covered in medstudy. I am not sure about MKSAP. Nonetheless, no matter which one you use just make sure you master the content. Medstudy has some questions after every few pages that I thought were extremely helpful to bring everything together.
There is also mention of multiple question banks. I felt that MKSAP had questions that were similar to the real exam. I thought the difficulty level was also similar. I scored 75% on the first attempt and 90% when I did the questions over. I also did the medstudy question bank as well as Kaplan's Qbook. However, I only did these books once. MKSAP definitely has more complex questions which I chose to spend more time on. The point here is that questions are needed not just for their content but also for training yourself to battle through the 4 long sections of the boards.
Medstudy + MKSAP questions were more than sufficient to prepare me for this exam.
In terms of correlating your in-service exam to boards, I always found that to be useless. Most people don't study for these inservice tests. I definitely did not study and my percentile was low.
In terms of the exam itself, I felt there was a fair amount of every subspecialty covered. While cardiology and GI seemed to have more questions in general, I certainly did not feel that other specialties were not present. In fact, many questions integrated multiple fields.
What made this test difficult was the fact that it was not straight forward and the questions required multi tier reasoning. If you are looking for "buzzwords" in this test, good luck. There are questions that use these "buzzwords" but they are few in number. When studying for this test you have to consider all differentials and what factors differentiate the diagnoses from each other. For instance abdominal pain has many causes but when you study the causes try to generate a chart that differentiates the causes in terms of duration, associated symptoms, age, co-morbidities etc. This is how you get to the answer on the boards. Memorizing random disease will only get you confused during the exam.
For those that failed, I know that it must be a devastating feeling. I feel that the best approach to repeating this exam is to pinpoint you areas of major weakness and restart your studying with these areas being the initial focus for mastery.
Goodluck