- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0

Hi. I'm new to the forum, and I wonder if anyone knows of any medical/osteopathic schools that currently offer an accelerated course of study (i.e., shorter than four years) toward an M.D. or a D.O.
Thanks.
So, L.E.C.O.M. and Texas Tech offer three-year programs, but they require you to enter primary-care? Are you not allowed to enter a specialty, if you wish?
Correct. You should probably work on getting into medical school and then seeing how you can do in a four year program before thinking you can do it in less. There is a reason medical school is 4 years
Well, the 3 year track is no different than the 4 year track when it comes to the basic sciences. Both tracks take 2 years to complete the basic sciences. The difference in the 3 year track comes when the clinical years come around. The 3 year track only requires you to do the mandatory clinical rotations (3rd year) and doesn't require you to do elective rotations (4th year). So, the the 3 year doesn't require you to learn more information in a shorter amount of time. I don't think Ross does either because you have summer sessions that are just as long as the fall and spring sessions.Correct. You should probably work on getting into medical school and then seeing how you can do in a four year program before thinking you can do it in less. There is a reason medical school is 4 years
Hi. I'm new to the forum, and I wonder if anyone knows of any medical/osteopathic schools that currently offer an accelerated course of study (i.e., shorter than four years) toward an M.D. or a D.O.
Thanks.
Pet peeve ...
No such thing as 'osteopathic school versus medical school.' 'Osteopathic school' is medical school. If you want to get more specific than that, you can discuss Allopathic (MD) medical schools versus Osteopathic (DO) medical schools, but doesn't change the fact that it's all 'medical school.'
GAHH! Me too! My dad does this and it drives me crazy. And when I tell him it bothers me he says "you know what I mean"...and I just want to punch him.

Hahaha, well if your Dad is anything like mine ... details aren't his strong suit. I attend KCOM aka A.T. Still University and my Dad came back frustrated from work one day because he couldn't remember the name of my medical school and told a group of colleagues that I was attending 'J.D. Zant University,' to which he received blank stares and had to confess that he was confused about the university title. How he got J.D. Zant from A.T. Still ... I'll never know, but take some solace knowing you aren't alone![]()
+1this just made my day. Thank you!
Well, the 3 year track is no different than the 4 year track when it comes to the basic sciences. Both tracks take 2 years to complete the basic sciences. The difference in the 3 year track comes when the clinical years come around. The 3 year track only requires you to do the mandatory clinical rotations (3rd year) and doesn't require you to do elective rotations (4th year). So, the the 3 year doesn't require you to learn more information in a shorter amount of time. I don't think Ross does either because you have summer sessions that are just as long as the fall and spring sessions.
Here's the PCP accelerated program timeline:
http://www.mutualgravity.com/sf.php?fn=0_76_public_images/pscp-flyer.pdf
The OP seemed disappointed he couldn't jump into a 3 year program so he/she could shine and show everyone how amazing he/she was and secure a triple board of Derm/Opth/Neurosurgery (yes I know this doesn't exist). My post was more aimed at the fact this guy put off the vibe "I can easily do medical school in less than 4 years why do I have to go for all 4"
Interest is where it kills you, on top of that fourth year of tuition, over a four to five year period of non-payment for a residency and fellowship.
Kind of a jack-ass presumption to make based on what little I said. I simply asked whether anyone knew of accelerated M.D. programs I'm unsure, and pretty uninterested in, how you filled in all the rest.
__________________________________________________
Now, first, thank you to everyone who's replied. Second, sorry for the multiple threads...
I'll look into the programs at L.E.C.O.M. and Texas Tech that have been mentioned. My concern is about becoming locked into a program I may eventually find is not best for me. I like primary care, and believe I want to enter it, but I acknowledge, too, things may change during the course of my study though this may be a faster track to what I feel I want, it seems unfair to myself I should enter obligation to a field before even beginning my medical training. Still, the programs at least are worth my investigating.
As for why I'm interested in completing an M.D. or D.O. in three years rather than in four, well, who wouldn't be? If nothing else, it should be rather cheaper to do so (save a whole year of tuition, fees, living expenses accrued based on student loans, etc.).
For anyone who hasn't begun medical school it is simply arrogant to think you can take a 4 years program and squish it into three without sacraficing something.
im going to cut the dude some slack. the excellerated programs dont cut out any pre-clinical education and the clinical education is where the lost year is located, but the remaining clinical education is highly focused on everything a PCP would face, rather than doing extensive study of specialties or surgery. You *could* do a 3 year deal and be as well trained as any other student if your only interest is in primary care (and so i'm only comparing their skills in primary care fields).
but you'd need someone who is fully and completely dedicated to primary care before even understanding what medicine is really about. Its a specific group i doubt more than a handful of people can actually fit into.
He already mentioned he didn't have an interest in being "locked" into a PCSP type program, yet still wanted to do Medical School in three years. Again, with as rigorous as I've heard medical school is, I'm just curious why he thinks he has the ability to do something like this.
Additionally I was probably originally a little over-hostile to his OP because he originally (they lead back here now) posted the exact same thing in nearly every forum for his first post(s).

A lot of the people in my pathway this year are nontraditional students that have prior medical experience, so I'll agree with that statement. The majority of our class didn't give the program so much as an afterthought because they had no idea what they would want to specialize in and didn't want to get locked into something early on--most were coming straight out of undergrad with no medical background whatsoever.but you'd need someone who is fully and completely dedicated to primary care before even understanding what medicine is really about. Its a specific group i doubt more than a handful of people can actually fit into.
For anyone who hasn't begun medical school it is simply arrogant to think you can take a 4 years program and squish it into three without sacraficing something.
You can think my assumption is jackassish but I in-turn think your question was the same. Many studies have been put out questioning whether 4 years is enough to learn everything and while you're fairly sure you can do what it takes most 4 and many 5 or more years to do.
You obviously haven't done any research into your question (a quick google search would have found you these answers). This leads me to believe you haven't done the same into what medical school even entails and that the majority of people who were stellar in UG now feel overwhelmed or at very least insanenly busy during their FOUR years.
So maybe instead of me assuming where you are coming from, maybe you can answer this question.
What makes you feel you would be able to complete a medical school curriculum in 3 years without sacraficing something?
That's great for high school students looking early but not so helpful for the premeds on here that are likely most of the way through their undergraduate education already. I'm pretty sure Youngstown State University has a similar program that feeds into NEOUCOM for a seven-year track (it's an MD program though.)NYCOM has accelerated programs BS/DO in 7 years with SUNY New Paltz and also NYIT.
That's great for high school students looking early but not so helpful for the premeds on here that are likely most of the way through their undergraduate education already. I'm pretty sure Youngstown State University has a similar program that feeds into NEOUCOM for a seven-year track (it's an MD program though.)
Arrogance could have been spotted in my even softly insinuating I feel I don't need as long to complete a medical curriculum as do others; I did no such thing. Your jackassishness lay, and lies, in suggesting — without a clue or care to why I might be doing so — I'm stuck up simply for asking if programs exist wherein one could achieve an M.D. in a shorter-than-traditional time. What makes me think I could do so? If they're out there (and it seems, from the replies here, they are, although there are not very many of them), why should I feel I'm incapable of meeting the requirements of such an accelerated course of study?
_______________________________________
Anyway, thanks again to those who made the suggestions they did. I've begun talking with L.E.C.O.M.'s admissions office, and I shall wait to see what their recommendation and advice are on this matter.
Have you heard if this new fangled program called Google? No? Then you were completely correct to come here and make a username and post the same question in every single forum on SDN.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=3+year+do+program&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=3+year+md+program&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1g-m1&aql=f&oq=