Sometimes you need to come down from your ivory tower and see the damage you do.
Have a nice day. I'm out.
Or you need to open your eyes and take off the defensive blinders. I mean, I get this is an emotional issue for you because it's your wife/family, but ...... like WTF pointed out, the vast majority of candidates pass. So if someone hasn't passed 4 times, maybe there's a good reason. Ideally, it's a deficiency that can be corrected if it's knowledge-based, or a test-taking issue (anxiety, reading problems, whatever) that can be managed with an exception such as allowing more time.
Your argument of "I keep talking to people who say they couldn't pass it 5 years down the road" isn't meaningful because the point isn't to pass it 5 years down the road. The point is to assess whether a candidate, at the end of their degree training, has the broad-based knowledge they were supposed to have learned. 5 years from now I won't be able to pass it because I'm doing only small animal work - I'll be helpless on poultry, swine, equine, bovine, caprine, etc. questions because I'm not DOING any of that, so it won't stick.
The test does suck - no doubt. It's hard and a lot of the content feels badly written and it's frustrating to be tested on material you don't care about. But you go into school knowing you have to take it and you have 3.5 years in which to prepare for it however you feel necessary for you to pass. In other words, you have all sorts of control over the outcome. If your wife isn't passing, the right approach is to
objectively ask why, and then deal with the reason. Not to gripe about the test, and not to get upset at the rest of us just because we passed.
I agree with you that the time has come for limited licensure where we are boarded into a specific area (SA, lab, equine, whatever). I've argued that for a long time. There are some smart and well-intentioned people who disagree with me, and there are definitely good reasons to disagree with me. I just think that ultimately the reasons to do it outweigh the reasons not to.
But that doesn't change things for your wife - she went into school knowing she had to pass a broad-based test. And she had 3.5 years to prepare. Not sure why that suddenly morphs into it being the fault of everyone else that she couldn't pass a test that she knew was coming for 3.5 years.......
And do you seriously believe she should be hired to teach vet med? (You complained that she can't do alternative tasks like teach without passing NAVLE.) Really? Maybe I'm crazy, but I'd like to learn from someone that passed boards. I mean, I wouldn't take driver's ed from someone who couldn't pass their driver's license exam......
It is a "paper test" that requires rote memorization. It does not test your clinical skills, it does not test your people skills, it does not test your ability to work under the real pressure of the working world. It tests your ability to take a test. Some test takers can pass, some can not. Some idiots are really good at taking tests. This test proves jack about you as a veterinarian.
Sure. But memorization is part of being a vet. Clinical skills are assessed in fourth year - that's just one part of being a vet. People skills are developed throughout vet school - also just one part of being a vet. Having a broad-based memorized body of knowledge is part of being a vet - and it's assessed during NAVLE. You don't - and shouldn't - get to be a vet just because you can excel in one area, but not manage all the requirements of the job.
You promised that in a previous post, too. Maybe this time you'll make good on your offer.
You also keep using phrases like "your policies". Not a single one of us here has any say, or has had any say, in the licensing requirements. They aren't "my policies" and there are significant changes I'd like to see to them - some of which are exactly in line with what you're talking about. But it doesn't change the fact that from Day 1 of vet school I knew exactly what I'd have to do to get through, and so I did what it took to do that.
Your wife's future would be more positive if, instead of just bitching about the system, you helped her find a way to take it on and beat it.
As to advice: 1) Figure out why she's failing. Are her scores changing? Is there a particular area or areas she is weak in? Is she having test anxiety? Does she have a reading disability? 2) Adapt as appropriate based on the answer to #1.