- Joined
- Sep 2, 2003
- Messages
- 9,012
- Reaction score
- 4,743
RADRULES said:Dude, the hate in your reply simply supports his point. Neurologists are a bunch of haters who wish they were smart enought to get into something else. They want to do imaging and neurointervention.... gimme a break.
Bunch of haters.
How many radiologists do you see trying to get into treating neurology patients? Speaks volumes.
Please. Spending my days in the dark going from in box to out box is not my idea of fun. You can consider yourself a test and only a test. From your little window, it looks like your test is the end all and be all of medicine and neurology. Just like it looks to the guy who enters the sodium levels into the computer.
Dentists do face lifts?
Anyway, the point is not that all of neurology hates radiologists. That is the sort of generalization that only a really stupid person could possibly make. In the vast experience of a medical student who rotates on neurology and contradicts himself in going from single to plural there is obviously little to argue with. The point is that radiologists tend to be clinically isolated. Their readings tend to reflect this. There are several points made above where I think this is telling, like where a radiologist thought that blood within a stroke was a contraindication to anti-coag. This sort of ignorance makes radiology a lot less helpful than it should be. It also opens up a window where a neurologist should read films to shore up these types of errors.
BTW, the reason I failed to match into radiology was because I failed to apply to radiology. I also failed to match into OB. And just because I think you're a ***** doesn't mean that I hate you.