anti 0 antibody

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I am trying to say that
0 Ag +Galactose= B Ag or
0 Ag+N-Acetylgalactosamine=A Ag
we have a kind of 0 antigen molecule on our erytrocytes surface, if AB blood group patients don't have 0 Ag they should be producing anti 0 antibody, so why they do not form it
 
I am trying to say that
0 Ag +Galactose= B Ag or
0 Ag+N-Acetylgalactosamine=A Ag
we have a kind of 0 antigen molecule on our erytrocytes surface, if AB blood group patients don't have 0 Ag they should be producing anti 0 antibody, so why they do not form it
Are you talking about the precursor form from which A and B develop?
 
It doesn't seem like you're understanding the major blood groups. O is not an antigen, it corresponds to null or no antigen. Of course, it doesn't mean that the erythrocyte doesn't have Rh or other minor antigens, it just lacks the A or B. Therefore, in the serum there are antibodies to both A and B. With AB blood, there are no (major) antibodies produced. Again, O is not an antigen so no antibody would be produced.

I am trying to say that
0 Ag +Galactose= B Ag or
0 Ag+N-Acetylgalactosamine=A Ag
we have a kind of 0 antigen molecule on our erytrocytes surface, if AB blood group patients don't have 0 Ag they should be producing anti 0 antibody, so why they do not form it
 
It doesn't seem like you're understanding the major blood groups. O is not an antigen, it corresponds to null or no antigen. Of course, it doesn't mean that the erythrocyte doesn't have Rh or other minor antigens, it just lacks the A or B. Therefore, in the serum there are antibodies to both A and B. With AB blood, there are no (major) antibodies produced. Again, O is not an antigen so no antibody would be produced.
My point exactly.
 
Top