- Joined
- Apr 22, 2005
- Messages
- 495
- Reaction score
- 0
girlsporty said:Not much... well, scrubs from Gross Anatomy if you must know. How 'bout you, prana_md?
saffron robes, of course!
er, my sweats from yoga. it's sunday ... don't expect much.
girlsporty said:Not much... well, scrubs from Gross Anatomy if you must know. How 'bout you, prana_md?
OSUdoc08 said:New rule. Girls must post photos on this thread prior to flirting with other girls.
one in scrubs and one in sweats... yummm. You two up for a third? I'm bi, see, so that means ANYTHING goes...prana_md said:saffron robes, of course!
er, my sweats from yoga. it's sunday ... don't expect much.
Besides, queer girls don't need pics - we have imaginations. (And yes, boys, that's why we can make your woman come harder than you can.)prana_md said:God broke my digital camera for being a sinful homosexual.
trustwomen said:Besides, queer girls don't need pics - we have imaginations. (And yes, boys, that's why we can make your woman come harder than you can.)
OSUdoc08 said:Since we don't have imaginations, how about livening up the thread a bit?
noonday said:this thread does not exist to facilitate your masturbation fantasies. contrary to the self-centered and misogynistic ideology held by most straight men, girl on girl action does not exist to turn you on.
plus, i thought gay sex was "wrong" and "gross" and "unnatural"
Excuse me, I was talking to girlsporty and prana...OSUdoc08 said:Since we don't have imaginations, how about livening up the thread a bit?
Perfect response. The voyeurs get verbal icewater down their pants, but the queer girls will want to get to know you all the more...noonday said:this thread does not exist to facilitate your masturbation fantasies. contrary to the self-centered and misogynistic ideology held by most straight men, girl on girl action does not exist to turn you on.
trustwomen said:Perfect response. The voyeurs get verbal icewater down their pants, but the queer girls will want to get to know you all the more...
I adore the kind of woman that sexist men consider to be an "angry bitch from hell". Rawr.
Goooooooooo Gay!prana_md said:God broke my digital camera for being a sinful homosexual.
why do you even care what a lesbian looks like? wouldn't you rather a hot heterosexual girl?OSUdoc08 said:Since we don't have imaginations, how about livening up the thread a bit?
Psycho Doctor said:why do you even care what a lesbian looks like? wouldn't you rather a hot heterosexual girl?
Nope. I never want to fight against that kind of woman - I want to fight by her side. The "flighting" would come later...girlsporty said:[/b]
You mean, the kind you don't know if you want to fight or f#(* ?
Oh wait, isn't that fight or flight?
experiementing with what???OSUdoc08 said:Only if the hot heterosexual girl doesn't mind experimenting from time to time.
And a w00t for the "prude"!Psycho Doctor said:why do you even care what a lesbian looks like? wouldn't you rather a hot heterosexual girl?
Excuse me... I meant the kind who you don't know if you want to argue with or f#($. "fight" was slightly alliterative.trustwomen said:Nope. I never want to fight against that kind of woman - I want to fight by her side. The "flighting" would come later...
haha of course i have my faults don't we all? ok maybe i have more than my fair share.trustwomen said:And a w00t for the "prude"!
(You're OK, PsychoDoc. You have your faults, but you're not creepy.)
He means other girls...Psycho Doctor said:experiementing with what???
In other words, PsychoDoc, OSUdoc08 is a hypocrite. You are not.Psycho Doctor said:experiementing with what???
of course i'm innocent ; i'm a Christian...don't they go hand in hand? and i'm not married but in a serious relationship.trustwomen said:In other words, PsychoDoc, OSUdoc08 is a hypocrite. You are not.
I'm amazed by your innocence. It's sweet. If you are married, your wife is probably a very happy woman.
(noonday, I swear I'm not an oathbreaker, really - but c'mon, I gotta get a pass for this one...)
Except why would I ever argue with a woman that is furious about sexism? I love a good debate, but there is usually not much to disagree with. Angry women energize me, they don't piss me off.girlsporty said:Excuse me... I meant the kind who you don't know if you want to argue with or f#($. "fight" was slightly alliterative.
My point exactly!!!trustwomen said:Except why would I ever argue with a woman that is furious about sexism? I love a good debate, but there is usually not much to disagree with. Angry women energize me, they don't piss me off.
Welcome! Maybe you can win some hearts and minds where you live, help wake the sleeping giant of compassionate non-voting liberals.NonTradMed said:Wow, just read skimmed the threads. I'm not gay, or atheist, but I'm liberal and pre-med, so just sticking my head in here to show support for those that are all these things. I'm living in a red state and not liking it too much but it's where I'll get cheap, instate med school education while living at home....for that, I'm willing to endure the liberal potshots here and again.
We'll take you anytime, Q. You can play third base.QofQuimica said:Woah, this thread has become way racy! Maybe I really SHOULD switch teams. I want to inform you all that I have so far received one marriage proposal as a direct result of this thread. I do not yet know whether my having a girlfriend on the side would nullify said proposal, but sweetheart, if you're reading this, let me know how you feel, m'kay?
Ok, so getting serious now....Flop, I am saying this with the utmost of respect that I can muster, because I really do like you, but you seem way too upset about some of the posts in this thread. Getting all upset every time someone posts an off-topic post isn't going to do anything except give you high blood pressure. Considering that this thread has broached the three most volatile topics on the planet (sexuality, religion, and politics), and all of us are still in possession of every finger and toe, I think we're doing ok. And like trustwomen, I think that it's nice to hear from other like-minded people. If that means wading through some other posts that are silly or off-topic, so be it. Life is messy, and SDN is no exception, but I don't think that this thread is all that horrendously off-topic. If there's some other issue that you want to discuss, by all means feel free to bring it up.
trustwomen said:Welcome! Maybe you can win some hearts and minds where you live, help wake the sleeping giant of compassionate non-voting liberals.
What kind of liberal are you? There seems to be some distinction (libertarian, keynesian, clintonian, canadian).
QofQuimica said:Ok, so getting serious now....Flop, I am saying this with the utmost of respect that I can muster, because I really do like you, but you seem way too upset about some of the posts in this thread. Getting all upset every time someone posts an off-topic post isn't going to do anything except give you high blood pressure.
prana_md said:I just wanted to remind you all that per Flopotomist's post #246, YOU ARE ALL GAY. I'd type more, but I'm exhausted from the depraved bisexual sex I had all last night
QofQuimica said:Woah, this thread has become way racy! Maybe I really SHOULD switch teams. I want to inform you all that I have so far received one marriage proposal as a direct result of this thread. I do not yet know whether my having a girlfriend on the side would nullify said proposal, but sweetheart, if you're reading this, let me know how you feel, m'kay?
Ok, so getting serious now....Flop, I am saying this with the utmost of respect that I can muster, because I really do like you, but you seem way too upset about some of the posts in this thread. Getting all upset every time someone posts an off-topic post isn't going to do anything except give you high blood pressure. Considering that this thread has broached the three most volatile topics on the planet (sexuality, religion, and politics), and all of us are still in possession of every finger and toe, I think we're doing ok. And like trustwomen, I think that it's nice to hear from other like-minded people. If that means wading through some other posts that are silly or off-topic, so be it. Life is messy, and SDN is no exception, but I don't think that this thread is all that horrendously off-topic. If there's some other issue that you want to discuss, by all means feel free to bring it up.
prazmatic said:Sigh, I guess I must now hook up with floptomist
I will continue to post once a topic has been established and when I am done making sweet homosexual love to him
kirexhana said:the funny thing is, i know what both of you look like.... and now i can't stop thinking about it
tease
prazmatic said:(What kirexhana doesnt know, is that I know what HE looks like too!! )
Would you like to join us??
trustwomen said:Perfect response. The voyeurs get verbal icewater down their pants, but the queer girls will want to get to know you all the more...
I adore the kind of woman that sexist men consider to be an "angry bitch from hell".
Yay for social justice! And yay for its Catholic supporters! (I swear, it feels like the Franciscans vs. the Dominicans all over again, sometimes.)NonTradMed said:Er...the social kind...? I guess I'm more libertarian in some ways, but I'm weird in that my catholic friends have converted me to the idea of social justice, which is considered 'big gov't' by liberatarians. Hm, perhaps Canadian works best for me. I agree with much of their policies, even though I think it still has problems.
noonday said:but damnit, like the button says, "i'll be post-feminist in the post-patriarchy." after working in a physical science field that's 85-90% male for almost 10 years, i've seen my fair share of sexism, so i KNOW it exists.
Ditto to all this. Except for the Catholic upbringing part (I was Anglican, aka Episcopalian).exlawgrrl said:I love that line. I tried to buy that bumper sticker once, but the company goofed on my order and never sent it to my. On a serious note, it's amazing how much cr@p you get just for saying you're a feminist. My other rant is to hear so many women say things like "I'm not a feminist, but ..." fill in some idea about sex equality.
Non-trad Med, I can thank my catholic upbringing for lots of my social justice ideas. I have a lot of anger at the catholic church for lots of reasons, but that's one area where they really get it right.
exlawgirl said:I love that line. I tried to buy that bumper sticker once, but the company goofed on my order and never sent it to my. On a serious note, it's amazing how much cr@p you get just for saying you're a feminist. My other rant is to hear so many women say things like "I'm not a feminist, but ..." fill in some idea about sex equality.
Non-trad Med, I can thank my catholic upbringing for lots of my social justice ideas. I have a lot of anger at the catholic church for lots of reasons, but that's one area where they really get it right.
trustwomen said:Girls are scared of being called feminists. They think boys won't like them. Kind of how so many girls morphed from "top of the class" to "complete airheads" in the summer before high school, does anyone else remember that?
I reassure them that your major problem in life will be shutting boys down, not getting them interested. (If you've got a vagina, and you're willing to share it with them, they'll be interested.) Besides, being an angry feminist has the wonderful side effect of rapidly separating the wheat from the chaff -so you can wind up with a secure, caring guy who adores everything about you.
Agreed.noonday said:i mean, i don't believe in god, or that jesus is the son of a god, but whatever he was -- a real individual, a fictional person made up to teach moral lessons, etc., it's a great character and the ideals are fantastic. and clearly the root of my socialism.
Yup, heterosexual couples with the most equality between the sexes (in domestic tasks, and SES, etc.) have the highest measured psychological well-being for BOTH partners (and better, more frequent sex).noonday said:guys who can handle feminists are not all whimps, and guys who can't handle us are just insecure and, at base, sexist and part of the problem. not to mention not anywhere near as good in bed.
I agree with this, though I've never liked the term "homophobia". (I much prefer "heterosexism".)noonday said:i love the whole well-grounded theory that homophobia and gay-hate is just misogyny, and that there's a really good reason why queer rights and women's rights need to be fought for together, with joint effort.
Sorry, no... But I do know a whole lot of radical educated activist women in the NYC area, does that count?noonday said:speaking of all this...anyone know any good 1-year gender studies certificate programs in the NYC area?
I LOVED the segment. I adore Colbert too.. remember his White House Correspondents' dinner speech!squareDR said:Did any of you catch "The Colbert Report" last night? His threat down segment was about "Threats to my Sexuality".
Very relevent to this thread. It is not on the Comedy Central website yet so I couldn't post a link to it but catch the rerun of the show tonight if you can (8:30 Eastern).
trustwomen said:I LOVED the segment. I adore Colbert too.. remember his White House Correspondents' dinner speech!
squareDR said:You know, I never caught that although I heard that he annihilated Bush and his cronies. What I do not understand is why he was invited to that dinner in the first place? Don't people get the tongue-in-cheek nature of the show?
It was meant to be a "roast" of the President, so some sarcasm and joking was to be expected - but not the clear and ringing criticism Colbert delivered (covered with humour of course, but still really really biting).squareDR said:You know, I never caught that although I heard that he annihilated Bush and his cronies. What I do not understand is why he was invited to that dinner in the first place? Don't people get the tongue-in-cheek nature of the show?
trustwomen said:It was meant to be a "roast" of the President, so some sarcasm and joking was to be expected - but not the clear and ringing criticism Colbert delivered (covered with humour of course, but still really really biting).
I think they thought he would show "respect" and not go as far as he did, that it would be humourous and light... but there's not a whole lot to respect about Bush, they seemed to have forgotten that. Somebody got fired over this, for sure. But it will go down in history! As Jon Stewart said, it was... balls-a-licious! squareDR, you should look it up online. It's 20 minutes of unbridled joy (for us).
Sigh. Liberal politicians DO support healthcare. Conservative politicians support physicians.newyorkcougar said:Why can't liberal politicians just support healthcare and quit giving that issue to the republicans!?