Will a nerve conduction study or EMG show with enough precision where the nerve injury is to rule out injury from interscalene nerve block? What do you guys do when a shoulder surgeon is blaming nerve injury on your block?
I doubt they would be able to say it was the surgery vs the block but they might.
If I had to say which is the most likely cause of injury I would say the block.
~4 percent for at least transient nerve injury last I read.shoulder surgery itself has a higher incidence of permanent nerve injury than a brachial plexus block
What nerve injury specifically? Suprascapular? Does that even count?shoulder surgery itself has a higher incidence of permanent nerve injury than a brachial plexus block
And then sue the surgeon's ass for defamation.
To professional reputation. It's a classical case of defamation. One can't just go around badmouthing somebody's competence without proof.Damages?
From my understanding you can somewhat localize the lesion via EMG/NCV studies with some adjunct role from imaging, however, the etiology of the injury can't really be declared from any of these tests unless the block is fairly remote from the surgical site.
A fictitious example would be someone who had a femoral block for a knee procedure and the testing was able to move proximal enough to delineate a lesion that is distant from the surgical site. However, I am not sure of the level of granularity of these tests and if this can be routinely done with this much precision.
Why not?To professional reputation. It's a classical case of defamation. One can't just go around badmouthing somebody's competence without proof.
Physicians do exactly that to other physicians everyday, everywhere!To professional reputation. It's a classical case of defamation. One can't just go around badmouthing somebody's competence without proof.