Step2myLou
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2018
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 11
In terms of percent matching, Anesthesia has a lower unmatched rate than FM. Would love to hear any thoughts about why this may be?
Before someone chimes in with “ANESTHESIOLOGY IS DYING AND BLOWZ” or something ridiculous... “Unmatched rate” is a very poor measure of how competitive a specialty is. For US medical students, if they aren’t getting any interviews / have a weak application they are steered towards a backup specialty which lowers the “unmatched” numbers. The same is true of DOs and IMGs.
A better measure is looking at Step 1 and Step 2 scores - which don’t appear to have changed substantially in several years (the same is true for most specialties, except Radiology which at last glance had a significant downward trend).
I have always thought that Anesthesiology has a bi-modal trend for applicants and programs - brand name academic places (“University of X”) tend to have higher cutoffs and have significant competition to get into. There are a growing number of community-based programs who are accepting applicants with lower stats and more marginal application. We will never see the exact numbers, but it would be interesting to see true charting outcomes for individual anesthesiology programs.
Before someone chimes in with “ANESTHESIOLOGY IS DYING AND BLOWZ” or something ridiculous... “Unmatched rate” is a very poor measure of how competitive a specialty is. For US medical students, if they aren’t getting any interviews / have a weak application they are steered towards a backup specialty which lowers the “unmatched” numbers. The same is true of DOs and IMGs.
A better measure is looking at Step 1 and Step 2 scores - which don’t appear to have changed substantially in several years (the same is true for most specialties, except Radiology which at last glance had a significant downward trend).
I have always thought that Anesthesiology has a bi-modal trend for applicants and programs - brand name academic places (“University of X”) tend to have higher cutoffs and have significant competition to get into. There are a growing number of community-based programs who are accepting applicants with lower stats and more marginal application. We will never see the exact numbers, but it would be interesting to see true charting outcomes for individual anesthesiology programs.
Did they only apply to top tier places?Anesthesiology as a whole is not competitive at all (i.e. you will match somewhere)I know some strong applicants who didn’t match this round. Research, high steps, good med schools. I agree with your thoughts here.
Did they only apply to top tier places?Anesthesiology as a whole is not competitive at all (i.e. you will match somewhere)
Last I checked an average USMD student with no research and average to slightly below average step scores had around a 92 percent chance of matching. And everyone from my class who wanted anesthesia matched easily.
Considering over 4K medical students didn’t match this year, I thank God and my allopathic credentials that I matched where I wanted to be....
the answer is something like... an every single one...I wonder how many countries are like ours where they allow foreign grads to apply for residency spots...
Though I do occasionally hear some people say they'd rather not match, and reapply, than to match to somewhere they dont want to go to so that could be 1 reason
There will always be those students who are unrealistic, almost arrogant, about their match list. Instead of a realistic list, they only want a top 20 program. Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs 2-3 "safe" programs where a warm body will suffice. In the end, a Board Certified Anesthesiologist from a bottom tier program is a better place to end up vs manager of the local Burger King.
Please correct me if I am wrong but I recall reading that the US was the only country that allows IMGs and FMGsthe answer is something like... an every single one...
Please correct me if I am wrong but I recall reading that the US was the only country that allows IMGs and FMGs
Please correct me if I am wrong but I recall reading that the US was the only country that allows IMGs and FMGs
You are wrong. Many developed countries allow FMGs to enter residency, or even practice independently, after jumping through various hoops of various difficulties. And I am not talking about stuff like the EU, where the graduates from one EU country have their medical studies automatically recognized in all the others.Please correct me if I am wrong but I recall reading that the US was the only country that allows IMGs and FMGs
Can’t you practice in Australia too? Maybe a year of observership?
I was referring to matching for residency. I was under the impression that the US is the only country that gives residencys to FMGs and IMGsOne of my old partners moved to France and practiced there until he retired. But he completed all his training here. Another guy I know did peds anesthesia fellowship in England after completing residency here.
Oh, my mistake. Thank you for correcting me I appreciate it.You are wrong. Many developed countries allow FMGs to enter residency, or even practice independently, after jumping through various hoops of various difficulties. And I am not talking about stuff like the EU, where the graduates from one EU country have their medical studies automatically recognized in all the others.
Where you are on to something is that (outside of the EU), we probably have the highest percentage of FMGs in the system. Until Eastern Europe joined the EU, and their docs were allowed to practice in the West basically overnight, we had probably the highest in the world.Oh, my mistake. Thank you for correcting me I appreciate it.
That is most likely what I read.Where you are on to something is that (outside of the EU), we probably have the highest percentage of FMGs in the system.
UK has a very high percentage of foreign doctors including 45% of their cardiac surgeons.
“Peter Starkings, the director of Global Future, said: “The truth is immigrants do not put the NHS under strain, they are keeping it going. This research shows, that without continued immigration into the UK, the NHS will not be able to function in its current form.”
NHS faces Brexit staffing crisis unless visa caps lifted – report