Are New Anesthesia Attendings HENRYs or are we Just HENR

Started by gaspusher
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
My assumption is that anyone brilliant enough to be highly competitive at Stanford would be found by someone seeking immense talent, regardless of undergraduate or lab affiliation. I’ve seen it dozens of times personally.


Could be but the path is laid bare and in full view at a places like that.
 
Connections. The benefit of these institutions is not what you know, but WHO you know. The courses at Harvard aren’t any better than the courses at Community U, but the people you meet at Harvard have the connections to get you that second lottery ticket.


Yes. The courses are likely very similar but the roommates, study groups, labs, internships, and mentoring are not.
 
I can only attest to my experience. But in my opinion, the "value" is not so much in the classroom as it is in the education you get from your peer group. I attended Stanford undergrad and what was memorable was the diversity of experience/excellence in my fellow students. There were otherworldly physics/ math geniuses, amazing philosophy/ polisci geniuses as well as olympic athletes. It taught you a certain humbleness about how no matter gifted you were, there was probably someone easily two standard deviations further out than you. I value what I learned from my classmates more than any class I took although I do have to say that taking econ classes from John Taylor and psych classes from Phil Zimbardo and behavioral biology from Sapolsky was a plus. It was the staying up til the wee hours of the morning discussing our dreams and aspirations and seeing how my fellow dormmates really had different POV's which I found so valuable and life altering.

I don't discount the "network" effect as it has given me much value later on in life. Connections matter in this world. It's something that I wish wasn't true, but it is a sad truth of the world we live in. This diversity of POV's has also been a valuable counter to the myopia that I tend to see in medicine i.e."I am an expert in medicine so I conflate that with being an expert in fields outside of medicine". Sadly, we aren't the only vocation that has this weakness as we see with the tech bro & finance bro overreach.

Now I also recognize that the elite institution have changed a bunch since I was there. I see how Stanford has become somewhat half jokingly but somewhat not...a tradeschool for quants/PE/VC...or tradeschool for AI/data science bros...There isn't the diversity of vocational pursuit that I remember from when I attended. YMMV. I do see value in some of these institutions...now is it worth the financial cost? That I would say is really only a matter of opinion. No different than whether you think that a rolex is worth 10's of thousands of dollars, whether california is worth the sunshine tax, etc. etc.

Finally, I do believe Scott Galloway's assertion is kind of right...elite higher ed institutions are becoming hedge funds that provide classes for the children of their investors.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I can only attest to my experience. But in my opinion, the "value" is not so much in the classroom as it is in the education you get from your peer group. I attended Stanford undergrad and what was memorable was the diversity of experience/excellence in my fellow students. There were otherworldly physics/ math geniuses, amazing philosophy/ polisci geniuses as well as olympic athletes. It taught you a certain humbleness about how no matter gifted you were, there was probably someone easily two standard deviations further out than you. I value what I learned from my classmates more than any class I took although I do have to say that taking econ classes from John Taylor and psych classes from Phil Zimbardo and behavioral biology from Sapolsky was a plus. It was the staying up til the wee hours of the morning discussing our dreams and aspirations and seeing how my fellow dormmates really had different POV's which I found so valuable and life altering.

I don't discount the "network" effect as it has given me much value later on in life. Connections matter in this world. It's something that I wish wasn't true, but it is a sad truth of the world we live in. This diversity of POV's has also been a valuable counter to the myopia that I tend to see in medicine i.e."I am an expert in medicine so I conflate that with being an expert in fields outside of medicine". Sadly, we aren't the only vocation that has this weakness as we see with the tech bro & finance bro overreach.

Now I also recognize that the elite institution have changed a bunch since I was there. I see how Stanford has become somewhat half jokingly but somewhat not...a tradeschool for quants/PE/VC...or tradeschool for AI/data science bros...There isn't the diversity of vocational pursuit that I remember from when I attended. YMMV. I do see value in some of these institutions...now is it worth the financial cost? That I would say is really only a matter of opinion. No different than whether you think that a rolex is worth 10's of thousands of dollars, whether california is worth the sunshine tax, etc. etc.

Finally, I do believe Scott Galloway's assertion is kind of right...elite higher ed institutions are becoming hedge funds that provide classes for the children of their investors.
Yes

It can add value if you are very talented AND seeking a high paying career AND go to thr best schools.

But its a pyramid...the number of kids who go to expensive private elementary, private high school and private undergrad/grad school and then fully utilize the opportunities provided and turn it into a high paying career that they wouldn't have had otherwise...is very small..as is shown in the average salary data for the best schools.

So the safest bet is to go public school and invest the savings...thats virtually guaranteed

But hey, if you have tons of resources, go for it
 
I can only attest to my experience. But in my opinion, the "value" is not so much in the classroom as it is in the education you get from your peer group. I attended Stanford undergrad and what was memorable was the diversity of experience/excellence in my fellow students. There were otherworldly physics/ math geniuses, amazing philosophy/ polisci geniuses as well as olympic athletes. It taught you a certain humbleness about how no matter gifted you were, there was probably someone easily two standard deviations further out than you. I value what I learned from my classmates more than any class I took although I do have to say that taking econ classes from John Taylor and psych classes from Phil Zimbardo and behavioral biology from Sapolsky was a plus. It was the staying up til the wee hours of the morning discussing our dreams and aspirations and seeing how my fellow dormmates really had different POV's which I found so valuable and life altering.

I don't discount the "network" effect as it has given me much value later on in life. Connections matter in this world. It's something that I wish wasn't true, but it is a sad truth of the world we live in. This diversity of POV's has also been a valuable counter to the myopia that I tend to see in medicine i.e."I am an expert in medicine so I conflate that with being an expert in fields outside of medicine". Sadly, we aren't the only vocation that has this weakness as we see with the tech bro & finance bro overreach.

Now I also recognize that the elite institution have changed a bunch since I was there. I see how Stanford has become somewhat half jokingly but somewhat not...a tradeschool for quants/PE/VC...or tradeschool for AI/data science bros...There isn't the diversity of vocational pursuit that I remember from when I attended. YMMV. I do see value in some of these institutions...now is it worth the financial cost? That I would say is really only a matter of opinion. No different than whether you think that a rolex is worth 10's of thousands of dollars, whether california is worth the sunshine tax, etc. etc.

Finally, I do believe Scott Galloway's assertion is kind of right...elite higher ed institutions are becoming hedge funds that provide classes for the children of their investors.

Ok, sure. But you’re still an anesthesiologist possibly doing pain based on the username. Idk how far out you are from residency but connections from undergrad mean jack squat once you’re an attending practice ing
 
I can only attest to my experience. But in my opinion, the "value" is not so much in the classroom as it is in the education you get from your peer group. I attended Stanford undergrad and what was memorable was the diversity of experience/excellence in my fellow students. There were otherworldly physics/ math geniuses, amazing philosophy/ polisci geniuses as well as olympic athletes. It taught you a certain humbleness about how no matter gifted you were, there was probably someone easily two standard deviations further out than you. I value what I learned from my classmates more than any class I took although I do have to say that taking econ classes from John Taylor and psych classes from Phil Zimbardo and behavioral biology from Sapolsky was a plus. It was the staying up til the wee hours of the morning discussing our dreams and aspirations and seeing how my fellow dormmates really had different POV's which I found so valuable and life altering.

I don't discount the "network" effect as it has given me much value later on in life. Connections matter in this world. It's something that I wish wasn't true, but it is a sad truth of the world we live in. This diversity of POV's has also been a valuable counter to the myopia that I tend to see in medicine i.e."I am an expert in medicine so I conflate that with being an expert in fields outside of medicine". Sadly, we aren't the only vocation that has this weakness as we see with the tech bro & finance bro overreach.

Now I also recognize that the elite institution have changed a bunch since I was there. I see how Stanford has become somewhat half jokingly but somewhat not...a tradeschool for quants/PE/VC...or tradeschool for AI/data science bros...There isn't the diversity of vocational pursuit that I remember from when I attended. YMMV. I do see value in some of these institutions...now is it worth the financial cost? That I would say is really only a matter of opinion. No different than whether you think that a rolex is worth 10's of thousands of dollars, whether california is worth the sunshine tax, etc. etc.

Finally, I do believe Scott Galloway's assertion is kind of right...elite higher ed institutions are becoming hedge funds that provide classes for the children of their investors.
55-60% of Stanford students are from public schools, so expensive private pre-college appears unnecessary

The majority of ceos are from public (88%)
 
No one is saying private is better than public. Choose what you like. I have the $$$ to pay for private schools and that is my choice to pick private schools.

Why do some here feel the need to tell someone how to spend their money?
 
No one is saying private is better than public. Choose what you like. I have the $$$ to pay for private schools and that is my choice to pick private schools.

Why do some here feel the need to tell someone how to spend their money?

It’s a thread about HENRY vs permanent HENR

I’d say this is the best thread to tell others how to spend their money.
 
No one is saying private is better than public. Choose what you like. I have the $$$ to pay for private schools and that is my choice to pick private schools.

Why do some here feel the need to tell someone how to spend their money?
its the psychology behind the choice that is being analyzed

can argue its because of one reason or another, but behind it all is usually some type of status seeking, which is why it kind of goes hand in hand with the fancy cars. "im better than the average person in this town" is the vibe those kind of choices give off particularly when you are already in a nice zip code with good schools
 
No one is saying private is better than public. Choose what you like. I have the $$$ to pay for private schools and that is my choice to pick private schools.

Why do some here feel the need to tell someone how to spend their money?
No one is judging you and telling you what you want to do with your money and your children’s education.

These are all personal choices. Do what’s best for your kids.

If you can afford it. Do whatever you want. I blow 50k a year on vacation the last 8-9 years? Is it blowing money away? I’m up in New York this weekend for the us open tennis. And I’m flying out to Italy in a few weeks for 4 days for a quick wedding I got invited to. It’s just money.

This thread is Henry and high earners.

Suzy orman used to have a show call can you afford this. She will tell callers if they should be spending money on certain things.

So to the Op of this thread. She will say NO to the 3.5 million dollar house. She normally would say yes to “good debt” but she will agree with most of use 2.7 million dollars of mortgage debt at 7% is bad debt.

Suzie orman will also say “yes” to you sending your kids to private school because you can afford it.

Suzie orman will also say yes to my vacation habits because I can afford it.
 
Some of us had negative experiences in public schools growing up. So we decided to try and eliminate that for our kids. Thus private schools.

Vastly better college resources than I had were available for my kids

But in any event it’s my money and I care to spend it this way.
 
Some of us had negative experiences in public schools growing up. So we decided to try and eliminate that for our kids. Thus private schools.

Vastly better college resources than I had were available for my kids

But in any event it’s my money and I care to spend it this way.
Correct. Spend it anyway you want to. Just don’t complain like the op complained not being able to afford his house to do other things like take a nice vacation

I’d probably be retired and /financially independent by age 45 if I didn’t choose to get married and have 2 kids. Raising a family can suck the financial life out of most of us.

These are all decisions we make.

If you value private school go for it. Don’t complain about the costs. No one is holding a gun to your head to send your kids to private school or to buy a 3.5 million dollar home.

Anyone making 700k income even with 10% California state income taxes and doesn’t have horrible work hours shouldn’t complain about money.
 
Correct. Spend it anyway you want to. Just don’t complain like the op complained not being able to afford his house to do other things like take a nice vacation

I’d probably be retired and /financially independent by age 45 if I didn’t choose to get married and have 2 kids. Raising a family can suck the financial life out of most of us.

These are all decisions we make.

If you value private school go for it. Don’t complain about the costs. No one is holding a gun to your head to send your kids to private school or to buy a 3.5 million dollar home.

Anyone making 700k income even with 10% California state income taxes and doesn’t have horrible work hours shouldn’t complain about money.
I don't think I or anyone on this thread who has kids in private schools has complained. I actually agree that private schools add very little educational value vs a good public and if looked from this lens its a big waste of money. Our family have other personal reasons for choosing private but statements like, "you must have ****ty public schools" by a poster, is quite inflammatory and myopic. Some saying its a status symbol is ignorant too.

Just like you choosing to have kids. Would be dumb for someone to say, "You must have a ****ty life to need to have kids"
 
Some of us had negative experiences in public schools growing up. So we decided to try and eliminate that for our kids. Thus private schools.

Vastly better college resources than I had were available for my kids

But in any event it’s my money and I care to spend it this way.
People just look at test scores and think that private schools are a waste of money.

More involved parents matters
more responsive administration to issues matters
smaller schools and smaller classes matters
more resources matters
more involved and qualified teachers matters

Our school have very little kiddie behavioral because parents are involved. Parents know each other. Issues get resolved at the child and parent levels.

the $500K+ I will spend to put my kids in private schools is one of my best ROI investment.
 
I don't think I or anyone on this thread who has kids in private schools has complained. I actually agree that private schools add very little educational value vs a good public and if looked from this lens its a big waste of money. Our family have other personal reasons for choosing private but statements like, "you must have ****ty public schools" by a poster, is quite inflammatory and myopic. Some saying its a status symbol is ignorant too.

Just like you choosing to have kids. Would be dumb for someone to say, "You must have a ****ty life to need to have kids"
People just look at test scores and think that private schools are a waste of money.

More involved parents matters
more responsive administration to issues matters
smaller schools and smaller classes matters
more resources matters
more involved and qualified teachers matters

Our school have very little kiddie behavioral because parents are involved. Parents know each other. Issues get resolved at the child and parent levels.

the $500K+ I will spend to put my kids in private schools is one of my best ROI investment.
This is an financial/investment thread. ROI is a financial/investment term.

So, in terms of ROI, its not a good investment in the majority of cases.

If you personally want to do it fine. If you personally want to drive a lambo and get immense joy..great! But that doesn't make a lambo a good ROI. Thats investment terminology

Its a different discussion
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
You guys are such idiots. Successful well adapted kids are the ultimate ROI of all the things we do to raise them including educational choices. This thread is like the echo chamber on WCI about never buying a new car or you won’t be FI.

It is literally impossible to have a real discussion about public vs private schools between anonymous posters when every school district is unique. Not all public schools provide a good education and not all private schools cost $50K per year. Quality and cost exist on a continuum and every location is unique.
 
This is an financial/investment thread. ROI is a financial/investment term.

So, in terms of ROI, its not a good investment in the majority of cases.

If you personally want to do it fine. If you personally want to drive a lambo and get immense joy..great! But that doesn't make a lambo a good ROI. Thats investment terminology

Its a different discussion
This literally can be applied to everything everyone choses in life.

Went to a fine steak house? idiotic ROI, just go to outback
Buy a car over 20K? Idiot ROI, just get a nice used toyota
spend $300 at nice hotel? idiot ROI, just stay at red roof in
Spent 5k going to destin? idiot ROI, just drive to your local beach
have a maid? idiot ROI, get on your knees
have a lawn guy? idiot ROI, go out and sub for exercise

Joy, peace of mind, experience is the best financial ROI. Much better than watching my bank account increase by another 5% yearly.
 
There is very little direct correlation between pre college schooling and ultimate employment. Even expensive college and grad school is a poor ROI.

High performers will do well in public schools. Same AP classes, same curriculum, etc.

According to the Department of Education Scorecard, former Ivy League attendees who received federal aid earn a median of about $90,500 a decade after starting school.


Entirely unimpressive
They never control for IQ in these studies haha
 
All the orthos I know are making 1 mil+ but they have surgicenter ownership or are spine
If you want to stay in medicine and want to make 7 figures in the long term, you better own something.

There is a finite amount of time in a day to crank out RVUs. There is a finite amount of years someone can physically crank out the RVUs.

Better to own, then let others crank out the RVUs.
 
This literally can be applied to everything everyone choses in life.

Went to a fine steak house? idiotic ROI, just go to outback
Buy a car over 20K? Idiot ROI, just get a nice used toyota
spend $300 at nice hotel? idiot ROI, just stay at red roof in
Spent 5k going to destin? idiot ROI, just drive to your local beach
have a maid? idiot ROI, get on your knees
have a lawn guy? idiot ROI, go out and sub for exercise

Joy, peace of mind, experience is the best financial ROI. Much better than watching my bank account increase by another 5% yearly.
Let me know that nice hotel where I can only spend $300/night.

I celebrate when I find something nice that is $500-600/night for a family of 4.
 
Last edited:
Teach your kids a work ethic and control entitlement. My brother and I went to public school… single parent home and our mom had problems. Both went to state universities. Both of us were raised by wolves… but found a way to be successful in our own.
My half brother had a two parent home and a famous private school advantage. String$ were pulled to get him into Rice off the wait list and he’s gotten every job he’s ever had bc his parents put up the money for his start up or my dad and his friends pulled strings to get him jobs. Often he’s been let go because he’s asked for a raise after a year and he hasnt done well after connections got him in the door. I love him - he’s my half brother - but objectively most of you would think he’s a jerk.
My point is public or private school doesn’t matter…. A good education requires a good student. Most kids need the lesson these days that life doesn’t owe them anything… if you want something - make it happen.
 
Let me know that nice hotel where I can only spend $300/night.

I celebrate when I find something nice that is $500-600/night for a family of 4.
Just a hyperbole but I am currently staying at a 1200/nt room w the family overlooking the pool and golf course. Great ROI.
 
My point is public or private school doesn’t matter
Exactly. But I choose Private over public no different than someone spending $200 on a steak vs going to outback. They are the same protein once it hits your stomach.

I like the private better for many personal reasons just like I like a $200 steak much better
 
Can one even do that?
Of course most people do it. I got tax receipts for everything.

Just can’t deduct the us open tickets as trump eliminated “entertainment” expenses for business in 2017. But u can still write off the meals you consume at the sporting event.
 
I saw those little ****s running amok at school events, and listened to my kids tell me about their days, and we didn't want our kids around them.

I'm a product of public middle and high schools. Private tuition for their high school years was money well spent.
1 you really think your own kids are angels? They're not

2 its just not true. Lots of evidence.

Either your kids are gonna do well or they're not. Sorry
 
Of course most people do it. I got tax receipts for everything.

Just can’t deduct the us open tickets as trump eliminated “entertainment” expenses for business in 2017. But u can still write off the meals you consume at the sporting event.


When I was a med student, our student activities office would pass out a stash of US Open tickets every year. They also had free broadway shows, opera, Yankees, rock concerts. I went to a Lynyrd Skynyrd concert because it was free. Don and Carol were the most popular people at school.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Our daughter went to an expensive (23-28k/year) private school for K-8. Most of her schoolmates were doctor/lawyer/tech/biotech worker kids. But there were also real estate developer and finance kids. A couple were grandkids of billionaires and kids of pro athletes. They got the whole week off for Presidents’ Day which they called “ski week”. Some families flew in private jets. She then went to our local public high school. While she did learn to write very well at that private school, it wasn’t a great fit for her or for our family. She was actually a lot happier in high school when she attended our local public high school which didn’t have any billionaire grandkids but offers AP everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course most people do it. I got tax receipts for everything.

Just can’t deduct the us open tickets as trump eliminated “entertainment” expenses for business in 2017. But u can still write off the meals you consume at the sporting event.
Inteersting! Never did that.

Did you buy these things? Lol

 
Are u writing it off??

I’m writing off my $1000/night nyc hotel this weekend
My wife and family are employees of my business. We only take trips with our kids if we do business. We only go out to eat when on business. We only shop for clothes used for business. 😉

Again, if you make alot of $$$, you need to try your best to act like Bezos.
 
1 you really think your own kids are angels? They're not

2 its just not true. Lots of evidence.

Either your kids are gonna do well or they're not. Sorry

Nah. I disagree. Your own kids don't have to be "angels" but you can't deny some kids are terrible. There are degrees to awfulness.

Some kids act like straight up delinquents and their parents don't care.

The main downside of the public school system is that these types of kids can really ruin the experience especially since schools don't expel/punish like they did 20 years ago.
 
My wife and family are employees of my business. We only take trips with our kids if we do business. We only go out to eat when on business. We only shop for clothes used for business. 😉

Again, if you make alot of $$$, you need to try your best to act like Bezos.
oh wow..i guess bezos created amazon for low level tax evasion
 
Nah. I disagree. Your own kids don't have to be "angels" but you can't deny some kids are terrible. There are degrees to awfulness.

Some kids act like straight up delinquents and their parents don't care.

The main downside of the public school system is that these types of kids can really ruin the experience especially since schools don't expel/punish like they did 20 years ago.

This really isn’t an issue for any kids with a chance of real success in college, or children of smart people like doctors. In most public schools, kids who have potential will be cordoned off or given more resources and special classes.

It’s not like the bad or dumb kids are ruining the algebra classes in 7th grade for the smart kids.

The issues arise when disruptive kids disrupt kids who would max out at a high school diploma or ged and need to have basic math or writing skills. If they can’t learn due to disruption their life outcomes may be worse due to not graduating high school.

The bad kids should be identified early and be put in practical skills programs or low level job training instead of high school. Some people weren’t meant to learn algebra or geometry and that’s never changing.
 
oh wow..i guess bezos created amazon for low level tax evasion
Amazon didn’t make “profit” for almost 10 years. Even after its IPO. Yet bezos homes got bigger.

Yet the irs goes after a low level Asian nail salon owner in Washington DC area for under reporting in in their businesses

And that’s why I roll my eyes at the liberals on these boards saying irs enforcement collects more tax revenue.

Yet these huge public companies like Amazon even after their ipo are still able to report no income (cough cough reinvestments just like emergents reinvests in clothing for his employees) and negative profits and still pay their executives especially through stock options.
 
Yet these huge public companies like Amazon even after their ipo are still able to report no income (cough cough reinvestments just like emergents reinvests in clothing for his employees) and negative profits and still pay their executives especially through stock options.
Threshold to write off a meal is to discuss business. When I have meals with my employees, we discuss business. I am allowed to write it off like every business. Just following the tax laws.
 
Amazon didn’t make “profit” for almost 10 years. Even after its IPO. Yet bezos homes got bigger.

Yet the irs goes after a low level Asian nail salon owner in Washington DC area for under reporting in in their businesses

And that’s why I roll my eyes at the liberals on these boards saying irs enforcement collects more tax revenue.

Yet these huge public companies like Amazon even after their ipo are still able to report no income (cough cough reinvestments just like emergents reinvests in clothing for his employees) and negative profits and still pay their executives especially through stock options.
I agree it's unfair. Not the point I was making. Anyway, give us more juicy stuff. How did you guys make your millions..can't be by writing off scrubs and jimmy johns. Teach us.
 
People just look at test scores and think that private schools are a waste of money.

More involved parents matters
more responsive administration to issues matters
smaller schools and smaller classes matters
more resources matters
more involved and qualified teachers matters

Our school have very little kiddie behavioral because parents are involved. Parents know each other. Issues get resolved at the child and parent levels.

the $500K+ I will spend to put my kids in private schools is one of my best ROI investment.
Something else that seems relevant is that, it seems anyway, it’s easier to cluster with people who don’t give their kids tons of screen time or motorcyc… I mean, “e-bikes” at smaller private schools.
 
These levels seem quite broad at first but the author's reasoning is that between 1M-10M NW, at a 4% withdrawal rate it doesn't really lend you a lifestyle that is very very different. Some other tidbits below:

"Level 1. Paycheck-to-paycheck (<$10k): You are conscious of every dollar you spend. This includes people with crippling debt.

Level 2. Grocery freedom ($10k–$100k): You can buy what you want at the grocery store without worrying about your finances.

Level 3. Restaurant freedom ($100k–$1M): You can eat what you want at restaurants.

Level 4. Travel freedom ($1M–$10M): You travel when and where you want.

Level 5. House freedom ($10M–$100M): You can afford your dream home with little impact on your overall finances.

Level 6. Impact freedom ($100M+): You can use money to have a profound impact on the lives of others (e.g., buy businesses, engage in large-scale philanthropy, etc.)."

he also talks about strategies to most reliably progress out of each level.

"Unfortunately, while sensible investments will help you grow your wealth in Level 4, they are unlikely to get you to Level 5 ($10M–$100M) and beyond. The data supports this conclusion. As we will explore in more detail later, 64 percent of households in Level 4 will still be in Level 4 two decades from now. Only 8 percent of households that start in Level 4 make it to Level 5 after twenty years. Level 4 is the hardest level to break out of for good reason—the strategy needed to get out is drastically different from the strategy needed to get in.


Imagine you just hit Level 4 and you have $1 million in investments. If you don’t save another dollar and your investments return 5 percent per year (after inflation), it would take forty-seven years for you to get to $10 million. Of course, you probably aren’t going to stop saving once you hit $1 million. So let’s assume you save $100,000 after tax per year, a significant sum of money. How long would it take you to get to $10 million with a 5 percent annual return? Twenty-eight years. What about if you saved $200,000 per year? Then it would take about twenty-one years. What about if you saved $300,000 annually? It still takes seventeen years! As you can see, even with a very high-paying job (e.g., $500,000 per year or more), it will take multiple decades to get to Level 5. And note that this would be after you’ve already made it to Level 4. If you manage to get to Level 4 in your thirties or forties, this is doable, but will still require a lot of effort. Unfortunately, as I will cover later, only 5 percent of people in their thirties and 15 percent of people in their forties are in Level 4.

This is why every wealth level has a singular thing for you to focus on if you want to keep climbing. In Level 1 it’s safety. In Level 2 it’s education. In Level 3 it’s investing. In Level 4 it’s starting a business. In Level 5 it’s scaling a business. And in Level 6, it’s protecting your wealth."
Is there anyone here at level 5?

Almost all docs never pass level 4.
 
I’m sure many are from the discussion here. I am at level 4. But hope to be at level 5 in 10-12 years
It would < 10% of us in my opinion. Almost all of us in this discussion are < 55 yrs old. One needs a VERY high income and time to accumulate that kind of wealth unless you own a big business.
 
Let me know that nice hotel where I can only spend $300/night.
I'm pained whenever I spend that much, though I have simple taste and don't have a family. Admittedly, hotels these days are out of control, especially on the weekend. I keep thinking it'd be fun to do a weekend in San Diego and then whenever I look the hotels are absolute madness and I call it off.
 
I'm pained whenever I spend that much, though I have simple taste and don't have a family. Admittedly, hotels these days are out of control, especially on the weekend. I keep thinking it'd be fun to do a weekend in San Diego and then whenever I look the hotels are absolute madness and I call it off.

Live a little. Splurging a bit on hotel costs to have an enjoyable trip is worth it.

I look back on some of my expenses with travel. Earlier in my career, I would focus excessively on the cost of certain parts of a vacation. Now looking back, it was never a big deal and didn't change the trajectory of my savings etc.

I'm not saying spend an extra $30k on a vacation, but a few thousand , especially if you are pretty good about being reasonable financially otherwise, isn't a big deal.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It would < 10% of us in my opinion. Almost all of us in this discussion are < 55 yrs old. One needs a VERY high income and time to accumulate that kind of wealth unless you own a big business.
Only docs I know off who are worth more than 100 million are business owners , 2 made it in in real estate, other sold out to PE multiple urgent care centers in NW Florida panhandle. And he was a plastic surgeon. So his plastic surgeon business didn’t generate the money. It was the urgent care business that generate money.
 
Live a little. Splurging a bit on hotel costs to have an enjoyable trip is worth it.

I look back on some of my expenses with travel. Earlier in my career, I would focus excessively on the cost of certain parts of a vacation. Now looking back, it was never a big deal and didn't change the trajectory of my savings etc.

I'm not saying spend an extra $30k on a vacation, but a few thousand , especially if you are pretty good about being reasonable financially otherwise, isn't a big deal.
Yeah, you don’t have to go crazy, but upgrading a little makes things a whole lot easier/nicer, especially with kids.

Our last vacation, the family wanted the beach. We wound up booking a room in a nice historic hotel with direct beach/ocean access, an outdoor area with a fire pit where we could be adults while kids slept, and easy access to food options. A little north of $500 a night, but we got a night free and a bunch of other credits. If we didn’t have closer options, I suspect it would become a yearly thing.

My wife is even cheaper than me and needed a lot of reassurance that spending like $5k for our biggest trip of the year was fine. That’s the other way to build wealth - have a partner who is high income and/or low cost.
 
7 Yrs.


I think level 5 doesn't start til 20m these days If the definition is house freedom. Maybe 30 in some.
5m is needed in certain real estate vhcols for a quality home...
Even if you primary residence is 5M, I think 10M is the right number given that the remaining 5M give a lot wiggle room.
 
Only docs I know off who are worth more than 100 million are business owners , 2 made it in in real estate, other sold out to PE multiple urgent care centers in NW Florida panhandle. And he was a plastic surgeon. So his plastic surgeon business didn’t generate the money. It was the urgent care business that generate money.
100m is private jet territory. I think that is what differentiate level 6 from level 5 (and higher end of level 4).