anyone else using/used the GS practice CBTs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 411309
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I've taken a few of them.. I find that the PS is very calculation heavy compared to the few AAMCs I've taken. I also think that the BS has a lot of trivia compared to the AAMCs. Finally I think the VR has passages that are too long and questions that are very different from EK101/AAMC. I've been consistently scoring ~10 on EK101 VR.

GS1- 6-6-10
GS2- 9-8-9
GS3- 8-7-9
GS4-8-7-10

AAMC3- 8-8-9
AAMC4-10-7-10

I think I'm going to continue to take them for practice. I'm finding that the practice is helping me with my test taking strategies/focus.

I'll be taking the rest of the AAMCs/GS and the real thing in the next couple weeks so I'll keep ya updated.
 
I've taken a few of them.. I find that the PS is very calculation heavy compared to the few AAMCs I've taken. I also think that the BS has a lot of trivia compared to the AAMCs. Finally I think the VR has passages that are too long and questions that are very different from EK101/AAMC. I've been consistently scoring ~10 on EK101 VR.

GS1- 6-6-10
GS2- 9-8-9
GS3- 8-7-9
GS4-8-7-10

AAMC3- 8-8-9
AAMC4-10-7-10

I think I'm going to continue to take them for practice. I'm finding that the practice is helping me with my test taking strategies/focus.

I'll be taking the rest of the AAMCs/GS and the real thing in the next couple weeks so I'll keep ya updated.


I took GS 1 and 2 before i really started studying so I cant count those and i dont use verbal but for me so far.

(PS, bio)

GS 3:8 10
Gs 4: 9 10


I also find the ps very calculation heavy which i think is what keeps me from getting 10s in that section. Bio can be tough as well.

Edit- Thanks for the info btw, ill update my scores as I go along too.
 
Top