- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 170
+1 for this one. Most useful book ever.The most important book I've ever read is How to Win Friends and Influence People. It's helped me be a lot more effective dealing with people.
+1 for this one. Most useful book ever.The most important book I've ever read is How to Win Friends and Influence People. It's helped me be a lot more effective dealing with people.
Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides
Yeah, it's very possible that he didn't fully delve into each of those topics, but I don't think he tried to. It's a pretty short book with a pretty specific focus, and he was extremely rushed while writing it because he wanted to finish it before passing away, so perhaps he didn't examine every aspect of mortality as thoroughly as some would like but he simply may not have had the time or energy to do so. If you think that significantly detracts from the book's overall quality, I totally respect that, but my opinion is that it actually gives even more power to the parts that he did intensely focus on.It has been a while since I read this but I am just stating the impression I got reading through and that it left with me. Here are some of the things that seemed not hashed out or fairly rudimentary in his thought process that were touched upon in the book.
Religion,
Nature of Consciousness
Children
Grief
I dont know if it was the amateur philosophizing that left a bitter taste in my mind. His discussion about those topics and how he dealt with his own mortality didn't scream deep thought to me. The writing style/cadence was also not pleasing to read.
I would argue that the chapter written by his wife at the end was much more touching and thoughtful, even written better IMHO.
Once again this is just my opinion.
I think our disagreement here highlights a pretty interesting and common chasm I've seen around SDN and in medicine in general, shown super well in this thread: Are there still lifestyle specialties besides derm?Well, lets look at an example.. There's a scene where he's describing anatomy lab and the professor (or lab proctor?) is reading basic info about the cadaver, and comes to the age which is 71 and this stops him in his place, he says "that's my age" puts down the probe and walks out of the room.. As if lab instructors are having existential crises every time a cadaver comes in who is their age or younger. I showed that and some other passages to my parent who in fact teaches an anatomy block and often is an instructor for lab as well at a med school and she thought it was ridiculous. I'm not saying the writer himself is naive, I'm saying it's written for the naive reader IMO.
There's another one where he's like 2 weeks into his internship year and the patient he's assigned to codes while he's sleeping, and he gets a phone call in bed and he immediately shouts a string of commands and of course ends it with shouting "stat!" *barf* There are many other examples of things written that came off as cringy to me.
I don't think "offensive" is the right term, it certainly didn't offend me, I just didn't enjoy the book. That doesn't mean other people can't enjoy it, that's why I said it was my personal opinion.
Just finished this series yesterday actually, and immediately began googling when the next book would be out.Absolutely recommend A Song of Ice and Fire by George R.R. Martin. Bonus points if you finish before July 16th when the new season comes out.
Don't forget Kafka , or camus. But I second Dostoevsky. I dreamt about the characters in the idiot for weeks after I finished reading it.Surprised no one mentioned Tolstoy or Dostoevsky, arguably the best novelists of all time.
Don't forget Kafka , or camus. But I second Dostoevsky. I dreamt about the characters in the idiot for weeks after I finished reading it.
The author of fight club, Chuck palahnuick is an excellent author. His Books are engaging and can be read relatively quickly. Fight club the book is not as good as the movie as Chuck himself has come out and said.1984
A Fine Balance
Unbroken
Mountains Beyond Mountains
I'm about to start Fight Club, liked the movie and heard the book is good
Don't forget Kafka , or camus. But I second Dostoevsky. I dreamt about the characters in the idiot for weeks after I finished reading it.
I really enjoyed the plague. The stranger is also an excellent read if you haven't already read it.I'm reading The Plague (by Camus) right now. One of the main characters is a physician and it sounds like a medically related novel but it is an allegory for the German occupation of France.
I wouldn't attempt a Russian novel without a good listing of Russian names and nicknames; they can be very daunting.
I think you're right that my off-the-cuff armchair criticism of the book was a bit harsh. I completely agree with your point of view, I was going to say something similar. It's the same reason some people loved House Of God while others really couldn't even get through it, we simply have different outlooks. Although It may have come off like I was, I wasn't trying to in any way insult the people who do love When Breath Becomes Air, just trying to give the impression it left on me personally.Yeah, it's very possible that he didn't fully delve into each of those topics, but I don't think he tried to. It's a pretty short book with a pretty specific focus, and he was extremely rushed while writing it because he wanted to finish it before passing away, so perhaps he didn't examine every aspect of mortality as thoroughly as some would like but he simply may not have had the time or energy to do so. If you think that significantly detracts from the book's overall quality, I totally respect that, but my opinion is that it actually gives even more power to the parts that he did intensely focus on.
I think our disagreement here highlights a pretty interesting and common chasm I've seen around SDN and in medicine in general, shown super well in this thread: Are there still lifestyle specialties besides derm?
One group (which seems to be disproportionately made up of primary care docs who work with underserved populations and surgeons) sees medicine as a true calling, and looks down on the other group for not feeling the same way. The second group sees the first as naive/dramatic/"cringy." In the thread I linked above, @neusu made a comment about medicine being a calling, and other people - not only other attendings but even first year med students - attacked him for seeming naive. When people like Paul Kalanithi and neusu still feel that medicine is a calling during neurosurgical residency whereas others find that to be nonsense, and when Kalanithi (supported by Gawande) finds profound meaning in small things like his lab proctor making a comment about being the same age as the donor whereas you and your mom find that to be nonsense, I don't think it's fair to say that naivety is at play - on the part of the author or reader - when the more likely factor at play is just our differences in the kinds of things that emotionally impact us.
For the record, I don't mean to make any claim about whether or not you view medicine as a calling or whether you're emotionally moved by subtle things, but just that saying the book is "riddled with ridiculous naive BS" was a bit unfair when people with so much more experience than you completely support his ideas.
+1+1 for this one. Most useful book ever.
I second this, "the Death of Ivan Illych" by Tolstoy is extremely relevant for anyone going into medicine and its a quick read!Surprised no one mentioned Tolstoy or Dostoevsky, arguably the best novelists of all time.
[I said:The Sex Lives of Cannibals[/I]
The Sex Lives of Cannibals
Would you talk about this in your interview though?