- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 701
- Reaction score
- 0
Wait,
I thought it was pretty common knowledge it was easier to get in to chiropractor school than medical school??
barump-shhhhhh

Wait,
I thought it was pretty common knowledge it was easier to get in to chiropractor school than medical school??
hahahahahahahahaha this thread is funny because you're asking a question that has no answer. If I had a 40 and 3.9 would I apply D.O. or M.D. or Both??? or if I had a 3.3 and 24 would I apply blah blah blah.... it's all about what they (adcom) think. not you. sorry to burst all of your bubbles. 😱
i think the much more important point is the DOs have all the same rights and privileges as MDs, at least on paper.
that being said, I don't think I've ever met a DO.![]()
i think the much more important point is the DOs have all the same rights and privileges as MDs, at least on paper.
that being said, I don't think I've ever met a DO.![]()
why is it inconceivable he has never met a DO? i certainly never have, at least in a clinical setting, and i know this for sure.You probably have and didn't know because they are identical to MDs in practice. I saw a DO for my PCP for 20 years and only found out in college he was a DO.
why is it inconceivable he has never met a DO? i certainly never have, at least in a clinical setting, and i know this for sure.
why is it inconceivable he has never met a DO? i certainly never have, at least in a clinical setting, and i know this for sure.
It isnt depending on where they grew up. In support of Jagger's post however, I too saw a pediatrician my entire life until I left for college. I contacted him to see about shadowing my senior year of undergrad and it came up that he was a DO. I was shocked. Neither of my parents knew either...and my dad is an MD. I think plenty of DOs get around the "feared" (according to SDN) question "what is a DO," by posting Dr.X rather than Dr. X DO
It's not inconceivable, it's just possible that he could have met one and never known (then gave my example). So you are sure that in the ER, FP office, Peds, family doctors, etc, you never ran into a DO? Did you ever see a doctor that just had 'Dr X,' on their coat instead of 'X, M.D. ?' Because that could have been the elusive DO. I ran into numerous ones volunteering in hospitals, etc. I guess if your clinical setting was academic, it's more conceivable.
where in general are you located? i don't think DOs are particularly common in my area, at least that i've seen. i always check the person's ID, which is why i know.
good point. i guess i will never know then. i know at least podiatrists get the correct DPM behind their names at the hospital i go to, but obviously this is a slightly different situation.Ahh, here we go, this could have been a problem. A lot of hospitals categorize all physicians as 'MD.' When they print ID badges, it says MD no matter what. This phenomenon happens all over the country (from the stories I've heard). At the hospital I was at in So Cal, there were DO residents with DO on their coats, but MD on their ID tag, and I've heard multiple people on this site say their hospital does it the same way. It could have been part of the issue, who knows though.
good point. i guess i will never know then. i know at least podiatrists get the correct DPM behind their names at the hospital i go to, but obviously this is a slightly different situation.
Ahh, here we go, this could have been a problem. A lot of hospitals categorize all physicians as 'MD.' When they print ID badges, it says MD no matter what. This phenomenon happens all over the country (from the stories I've heard). At the hospital I was at in So Cal, there were DO residents with DO on their coats, but MD on their ID tag, and I've heard multiple people on this site say their hospital does it the same way. It could have been part of the issue, who knows though.
this.
its funny how virtually every other response in this thread failed to address the OPs question.
Pre meds just like to argue. Or hear themselves speak (post). Probably both.![]()
It's not the end of the world if someone hasn't seen a DO, even in a hospital. Why make excuses such as an eneducated badge printer?
oh, please. This argument makes me want to throw up as much as cam practicioners who claim to treat the "whole patient" and not just the disease. Md schools emphasize the "whole applicant" just as much as any school.
Also, i think it's funny that people will defend do schools' reasons for having lower matriculating student stats tooth and nail, yet when an applicant with a sub-par application/stats posts a "what are my chances?" thread in pre-allo, everyone advises them to "consider adding do schools" - i always took that to mean that it was because it would boost their chances of a successful admission...?
Oh, please. This argument makes me want to throw up as much as CAM practicioners who claim to treat the "whole patient" and not just the disease. MD schools emphasize the "whole applicant" just as much as any school.
Also, I think it's funny that people will defend DO schools' reasons for having lower matriculating student stats tooth and nail, yet when an applicant with a sub-par application/stats posts a "What are my chances?" thread in pre-allo, everyone advises them to "consider adding DO schools" - I always took that to mean that it was because it would boost their chances of a successful admission...?
also, god ... I am seriously sick of arguing these stupid, inane points. Seriously, i think it was hoody that said all we pre-meds do is argue with each other with zero percent chance of either side changing their mind 1%. It's something in our stupid, competitive nature or something. And here's the kicker ... Were on the same team. We are going to be learning the same crap, competing for a lot of the same residencies, and practicing side by side together in the adult world. It's nuts, and i'm just as guilty of this immature, pointless banter as anyone else. Jesus. So fine, yes, i'm sure people can go their whole lives never seeing a do, ever with no other explanation than they've just never seen one. If that is really the point that i am arguing against here ... I simply cannot. I don't give a ****.
I don't see a huge difference between a 27-28 MCAT vs. a 30-31 MCAT, or a 3.4 GPA vs 3.7GPA; I'm saying others may feel differently, this is just me.
Admittedly, I am one of those DO proponents. But everyone agrees on this thread that overall the stats for accepted DO students are lower than MD students. I personally say 'slightly' because I don't see a huge difference between a 27-28 MCAT vs. a 30-31 MCAT, or a 3.4 GPA vs 3.7GPA; I'm saying others may feel differently, this is just me.
So yes, when people ask 'what are my chances' I would respond with 'apply broadly', to me, broadly implies DO schools as well, solely based off of stats. The part I don't understand is why so many people hate on DO schools. The goal is to be a doctor right?
Additionally, most people state to add DO schools because a particular pre-med may not be aware that the option even exists.
only if you let it....good job. go hijack some other threads while your at it.
No. Never.![]()
let it go if you try to focus.
its not really about admissions standards. its more about acceptance rates. The OP brushed on standards after initially asking about acceptance rates and like clockwork, it turned into a bitch fest about MD vs. DO regarding GPA/MCAT. You lack the most basic insight.....common sense too. And?
Calm the **** down. You've been whining and complaining this entire thread.
Yeah, that chick is PISSED.
I think we all had a run-in with her on this thread. Angry person.
👍 Words of wisdom.The reason why there is so much argument on SDN is because it's really not as cut and dry as people would like it to be. The 2.8/3.6 may leave you SOL for private MD schools, but this could definitely not be the case for state MD schools. I know a guy in Ohio who has an MD interview with a 3.3/28. I also know a guy in CA who was waitlisted at his top choice UC with a 4.0/39, but had interviews and acceptances at Harvard and Yale. This tells me that there is a difference between private and public MD stats, and also that people in certain states get bigger slack due to state schools than others. If my first friend with the 3.3/28 was from CA, I can only assume he'd be SOL for state schools, but could have some luck with DOs, opposed to living in a different state and snagging the public MD interview. It's not a formulaic issue, and if you look over the entire spectrum, there is probably a lot of stat overlap. However, I don't think it's an issue either side needs to get enraged over, nor do I think people repeating SDN catch phrases adds much validity to an argument.
And because of that, maybe then the DOs should only be restricted to DO residencies. At that point, we might see how many really believe in the philosophy.Yes I agree most people apply to both and even if they paid the outrageous DO payment they will loose it and go MDif they are accepted. When you look at percentiles there is a big difference between a 27 and 30 MCAT score in everyday math 27 is rounded to a 30. Another thing when you do the DO application bad grades are replaced by better grades the MD application does not do that so your GPA is lower and if you do not meet a schools cut off you are not looked at.
So yes it is easier to get in a DO school.
But they (DO) have more opportunities for residencies because they can do MD and DO residencies, but we can only do MD residencies
It's only been about twenty years since MD residencies were opened to DO graduates. Without question before that, and to many since then, osteopathy has a quack cachet similar to chiropractics. Few people seek out osteopathic treatment in preference to mainstream medical care.
MD vs DO - the degrees are not equivalent to the general public, nor (as pointed out, and all else being equal) to those seeking med school admission, who rarely express a preference for DO schools.
Ahh, here we go, this could have been a problem. A lot of hospitals categorize all physicians as 'MD.' When they print ID badges, it says MD no matter what. This phenomenon happens all over the country (from the stories I've heard). At the hospital I was at in So Cal, there were DO residents with DO on their coats, but MD on their ID tag, and I've heard multiple people on this site say their hospital does it the same way. It could have been part of the issue, who knows though.
It's only been about twenty years since MD residencies were opened to DO graduates. Without question before that, and to many since then, osteopathy has a quack cachet similar to chiropractics. Few people seek out osteopathic treatment in preference to mainstream medical care.
MD vs DO - the degrees are not equivalent to the general public, nor (as pointed out, and all else being equal) to those seeking med school admission, who rarely express a preference for DO schools.
And because of that, maybe then the DOs should only be restricted to DO residencies. At that point, we might see how many really believe in the philosophy.
Second why is there more of a distinction between DO vs. MD than Drexel vs. Wash U. I believe the second case has a greater number disparity and yet I don't see people say gezz I will not go to this doctor he has only educated at Drexel (substitute any lower tier MD school).
I found something that said it was 1985, but maybe that's wrong?Its been over 50 years. .
OMT is an adjunct to mainstream allopathic care.
I agree that chiropractics is quackish but to compare modern DO's to chiropracters is just uneducated.
I found something that said it was 1985, but maybe that's wrong?
Really? Have the techniques and principles been scientifically proven and subjected to ongoing scientific research, as with mainstream allopathic medicine?
To pretend that osteopathic medicine is mainstream and widely viewed as such is naive.
I recognize that DO schools have provided an entry path for thousands of deserving and well-intended people to become medical care providers. Ultimately, the care most provide is allopathic medicine. I believe many in the patient world still find the DO/osteopathic label to be off-putting.