- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 3,555
- Reaction score
- 6,116
The difference between a "minor" and "major" offense as it pertains to practicing medicine is not as clear cut as misdemeanor vs. felony. There are plenty of misdemeanors that may require a minor penalty when it comes to the courts yet cast serious doubts about a person's professionalism, which is of paramount importance to practicing medicine and thus may appropriately give a medical board pause to grant a license. The semantics of narcotics vs. tranquilizers, while perhaps relevant to the courts, doesn't change the fact that by forging a prescription he was practicing medicine outside of his scope of practice (which at the time should have been NONE)--and that's a problem because you don't want someone who doesn't recognize their limits practicing medicine. Maybe he's changed in the past decade, but once you've done that once it becomes really hard to justify taking a chance on such a person when there are plenty of qualified people who DON'T have that stain on their record.
Furthermore, as I think you said yourself, this entire discussion is likely moot. While the article was delightful clickbait which painted him in a very sympathetic light, there's no way that an IMG from a non-big 4 Carib school 2 years from graduation is going to match on his second (third?) application attempt in a more competitive specialty than the one he already failed to match.
Exactly, fails to match FM. No chance he’s matching psych the next year