The disdain that I and many others have about DO schools is that many of us were blatantly lied to. When I applied, the motto of our school was to create good doctors to help the people of strongly underserved regions. It did not have any emphasis on that being specifically via primary care - in fact, both in my personal statement and my interview I had mentioned that I was interested in a surgical subspecialty. As the AOA got closer and closer to completion of the merger, so too did the attitude of my school change. Unfortunately at that point, I was already a 1st year and it was too late to go to an MD school.
And for the 1st year wondering why we bitch about OMM and not just do research about it - it is because there is no interest to sponsor research in the first place. If you look at the type of papers that are submitted and accepted to the JAOA, they’re completely atrociously done studies that would have never been approved for publication in any other reputable medical journal. Secondly, because of the nature of OMM, it makes actually studying it difficult due to how subjective the effectiveness of it is. Just because a patient says it makes them feel a little better after you do it does not mean it is objectively good for patient care. Patients will tell you that getting antibiotics for their viral infections makes them feel better, which we know is bogus. To put it simply, OMM relies on an outdated, pre-evidence based approach and is by today’s standards, BAD MEDICINE.