Astro Career Center and "A Roadmap for Recruiting Medical Students into Radiation Oncology during a Period of Waning Interest"

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Update of the current Astro Career Center Job posting on 01/10/2022 (done via Astro Member search):


1) Rad Onc private practice with Lexington Clinic (Lexington, KY). $150k signing bonus. This job has been post off and on for years.
2) Rad Onc private practice with Methodist Health System (Omaha, NE).
3) Rad Onc private practice with Genesis Care (Oklahoma City, OK).
4) Rad Onc employed with West Tennessee Healthcare (Jackson, TN).
5) Rad Onc employed with Guthrie Clinic (Sayre, PA).
6) Rad Onc private practice with Sand Lake Cancer Center (Orlando, FL).
7) Rad Onc urorads with Solaris Health Partners (Chicago Ridge and Joliet, IL).
8) Rad Onc academics with City of Hope “diversity focus” (Duarte, CA). Job upgraded to attract more diverse candidates (whatever that means).
9) Rad Onc academics with University of Maryland (Baltimore, MD).
10) Rad Onc private practice with West Michigan Cancer Center (Kalamazoo, MI).
11) Rad Onc private practice with Radiation Oncology Associates (Milwaukee, WI).
12) Rad Onc community academics with Cleveland Clinic (Stuart, FL).
13) Rad Onc academics with the University of New Mexico (Albuquerque, NM).
14) Rad Onc private practice with Radiation Oncology Associates (Arlington Heights, IL).
15) Rad Onc community academics with Baptist MDACC (Jacksonville, FL).
16) Rad Onc academics with Cedars Sinai (Los Angeles, CA).
17) Rad Onc private practice per diem with MultiCare Rockwood Clinic (Spokane, WA).
18) Rad Onc employed with Geisinger (Wilkes-Barre, PA).
19) Rad Onc employed with Providence St. Mary Medical Center at 4 days/week (Walla Walla, WA).
20) Rad Onc employed with Marin Cancer Care “the position will be part-time for several years, with the option to transition to full-time in 5-7 years” (Marin, CA).
21) Rad Onc employed at VA (Brooklyn, NY).
22) Rad Onc academics with University of South Florida (Tampa, FL).
23) Rad Onc employed with US Oncology Network (Maplewood, MN).
24) Rad Onc private practice with Coastal Radiation Oncology Medical Group (Coastal, CA).
25) Rad Onc employed with Aultman Hospital (Northeastern, OH).
26) Rad Onc employed with US Oncology (Phoenix, AZ).
27) Rad Onc employed with US Oncology (Tucson, AZ).
28) Rad Onc academics with University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA).
29) Rad Onc community academics with Duke (Orangeburg, SC).
30) Rad Onc academics with UCSF (San Francisco, CA).
31) Rad Onc employed with Cape Cod Healthcare (Hyannis, MA).
32) Rad Onc employed with Marshfield Medical Center (Marshfield, WI).
33) Rad Onc private practice with Washington Permanente Medical Group (Seattle, WA).
34) Rad Onc employed with WellSpan Health (Chambersburg, PA).
35) Rad Onc employed with WellSpan Health (York, PA).
36) Rad Onc academics with UPenn (Philadelphia, PA).
37) Rad Onc community academics with Dartmouth (Keene, NH).
38) Rad Onc confidential (Bullhead City, AZ).
39) Rad Onc community academics “The practice will include two clinical days/week at the Duke University Hospital in Durham and 1-2 clinical days/week at a community cancer center within 45 minutes of the triangle area with 1-2 days/week for scholarly time.” (Triangle Area, NC).
40) Rad Onc employed with Kadlec Clinic (Kennewick, WA).
41) Rad Onc employed with Ascension's Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital (Binghamton, NY).
42) Rad Onc academics with Indiana University (Indiana, nos).
43) Rad Onc academics with Allegheny Health Network (Pittsburgh, PA).
 
Last edited:
The West Michigan practice is a good one, with good people. Kalamazoo is not for everyone, but not terribly far for the occasional weekend trip to Chicago or Detroit.

Tucson AZ Onc is a good position, with good people. They are truly hiring.

I interviewed with Coastal CA at ASTRO years ago. Nice people. Did not invite me for onsite 🙁

Allegheny is a sleeper. I really like the city of Pittsburgh and with Dr. Beriwal joining there, program will continue to improve. Staff docs appear to be quite happy there.

Milwaukee group is legit and good people.

Baptist MDACC is a good gig if you like Jax, FL (I know, I know, people hate the affiliates).
 
The West Michigan practice is a good one, with good people. Kalamazoo is not for everyone, but not terribly far for the occasional weekend trip to Chicago or Detroit.

Tucson AZ Onc is a good position, with good people. They are truly hiring.

I interviewed with Coastal CA at ASTRO years ago. Nice people. Did not invite me for onsite 🙁

Allegheny is a sleeper. I really like the city of Pittsburgh and with Dr. Beriwal joining there, program will continue to improve. Staff docs appear to be quite happy there.

Milwaukee group is legit and good people.

Baptist MDACC is a good gig if you like Jax, FL (I know, I know, people hate the affiliates).
Thanks for the commentary/color there. That costal California one is surprising, to me at least, given the super desirable location. I think a lot of these repeat jobs could get more interest if they would clearly state what compensation would look like instead of just vague terms.
 
The West Michigan practice is a good one, with good people. Kalamazoo is not for everyone, but not terribly far for the occasional weekend trip to Chicago or Detroit.

Tucson AZ Onc is a good position, with good people. They are truly hiring.

I interviewed with Coastal CA at ASTRO years ago. Nice people. Did not invite me for onsite 🙁

Allegheny is a sleeper. I really like the city of Pittsburgh and with Dr. Beriwal joining there, program will continu pricee to improve. Staff docs appear to be quite happy there.

Milwaukee group is legit and good people.

Baptist MDACC is a good gig if you like Jax, FL (I know, I know, people hate the affiliates).
Orlando job has been a revolving door every few years. Med onc owns the Linac and the practice, further digging around would be prudent for anyone considering that job.

Jax group fairly stable, partially made up of a well known private practice that dissolved many years ago. Interestingly, no affiliation with any of the 3 particle centers (uf, mayo, Ackerman)
 
Thanks for the commentary/color there. That costal California one is surprising, to me at least, given the super desirable location. I think a lot of these repeat jobs could get more interest if they would clearly state what compensation would look like instead of just vague terms.
In the past coastal California had terrible compensation.
 
I just can’t see this passing. Supermajorities required in both houses to pass plus multiple propositions. Specific Medicare/Medicaid waivers needed, likely by congress. A lot of people support single payer in theory but don’t want to give up their current plan . Kaiser and Sutter are 2 of the biggest employers in the state before we even consider the insurance side. It may be a sad state of affairs, but our current system may be “too big to fail”
 
Doctors live in the Bay Area?

Absolutely. There are the dual doc couples or doc/tech couples that stretched and bought a 2-3 million dollar 1800 square foot house. Or, more infuriatingly there are the docs who started practice 20 years ago and bought a 1-2 million dollar house that is now with 10 million.
 
Between natural calamities, water scarcity, and public policy that seems to be chasing people with jobs away, it seems like the California housing bubble is going to end really poorly for a lot of people.

Meanwhile, I'm buying up every moderately tall hill in south Florida because it'll be a private island in a decade.
 
Stanford is looking better and better. Taking 5 residents a year and then all those fellowships and instructorships to go with a warm and fuzzy faculty.
 
I think this article was mentioned somewhere on here but couldn't find it. Just read it today. I'd like to highlight:

Canadian Perspective on Radiation Oncology Workforce Planning and the Job Market

"In response, the CARO Human Resources and RO Program Director Committees agreed to voluntarily decrease resident intake to 21 per year in 2011 and limit resident transfers into the specialty. The CARO Human Resources Committee also provides annual monitoring of workforce trends, reports RO graduates’ employment outcomes, and performs iterative needs-based workforce projections to advise residency programs of the appropriate trainee cohort size. CARO supports this work to increase awareness and understanding among stakeholder groups and provide transparency to the Canadian RO community. As a result, annual trainee numbers decreased 36% from 163 RO residents in 2008 to 105 in 2020.

Although the current RO workforce situation in Canada favors a modest oversupply, modeling predicts an imminent transition to a balanced employment market due to fewer trainees and rising retirement numbers. A 2020 update of Canadian RO graduates’ employment outcomes found 89% secured staff employment within 1 year after residency (unpublished data), compared with 54% to 68% reported in prior studies. Fellowship training remains common after residency, especially for graduates interested in academic practice. Crucially, trainee regulation has also led to reduced graduate emigration outside Canada."

Just a reminder to all those considering rad onc in the US, there is zero evidence that I have seen that the current academic programs/"leadership" have any interest in studying the issue in a serious manor or reducing the trainee numbers in a substantive fashion do to the inherent conflict of interest in shrinking one's program.

 
I think this article was mentioned somewhere on here but couldn't find it. Just read it today. I'd like to highlight:

Canadian Perspective on Radiation Oncology Workforce Planning and the Job Market

"In response, the CARO Human Resources and RO Program Director Committees agreed to voluntarily decrease resident intake to 21 per year in 2011 and limit resident transfers into the specialty. The CARO Human Resources Committee also provides annual monitoring of workforce trends, reports RO graduates’ employment outcomes, and performs iterative needs-based workforce projections to advise residency programs of the appropriate trainee cohort size. CARO supports this work to increase awareness and understanding among stakeholder groups and provide transparency to the Canadian RO community. As a result, annual trainee numbers decreased 36% from 163 RO residents in 2008 to 105 in 2020.

Although the current RO workforce situation in Canada favors a modest oversupply, modeling predicts an imminent transition to a balanced employment market due to fewer trainees and rising retirement numbers. A 2020 update of Canadian RO graduates’ employment outcomes found 89% secured staff employment within 1 year after residency (unpublished data), compared with 54% to 68% reported in prior studies. Fellowship training remains common after residency, especially for graduates interested in academic practice. Crucially, trainee regulation has also led to reduced graduate emigration outside Canada."

Just a reminder to all those considering rad onc in the US, there is zero evidence that I have seen that the current academic programs/"leadership" have any interest in studying the issue in a serious manor or reducing the trainee numbers in a substantive fashion do to the inherent conflict of interest in shrinking one's program.


the Canadians don’t seem to be relinquishing fellowships despite the improvement. Unless those fellowships are in giving chemo, it sounds like they are still wasting time.

Also 89% placement. So 11% are graduating and doing what exactly? Fellowship? A research year?
 
the Canadians don’t seem to be relinquishing fellowships despite the improvement. Unless those fellowships are in giving chemo, it sounds like they are still wasting time.

Also 89% placement. So 11% are graduating and doing what exactly? Fellowship? A research year?
Well I guess that's a substantial improvement compared to 10 or 15 years ago. Just shows how long it takes to turn around the ship even after the vested parties actually decided to take corrective action.
 
Well I guess that's a substantial improvement compared to 10 or 15 years ago. Just shows how long it takes to turn around the ship even after the vested parties actually decided to take corrective action.

I think it’s been agreed the ship will not turn around. That’s why I’m hawking protons or anything that keeps the people coming in. Academics will never be your friends.
 
the Canadians don’t seem to be relinquishing fellowships despite the improvement. Unless those fellowships are in giving chemo, it sounds like they are still wasting time.

Also 89% placement. So 11% are graduating and doing what exactly? Fellowship? A research year?
I would say it’s only been in the past 1-3 years that we’ve been seeing a small but increasing amount of Canadian RO grads going straight into practice. The more desirable/larger academic centres have still been placing a value of fellowship training but my estimate is between 5-15% of Canadian ROs have been going direct to clinical practice, which in the 5-10 years prior to this has been very rare. Most proceed to a fellowship.

Edit: I just looked at the latest numbers. Has ranged but 2021 35% of graduates are going direct to practice which is the highest it has been (15% year prior)
Us has also been an outlet for Canadians.
Absolutely, but the amount of ROs going to the US has also been dropping over the last few years as well. The few ones that continue to do so in the past few years to the best of my knowledge I think are those that are pursuing higher remuneration, also have citizenship, or have been getting positions more in line with their research aspirations, and not for lack of career opportunities up North. Most Canadian RO trainees do want to stay in Canada, for which the opportunity now is better than ever. I was looking myself for a period of 6-12 months for a position in the US but happy and lucky to have found a spot in my hometown at the end of the day.
Well I guess that's a substantial improvement compared to 10 or 15 years ago. Just shows how long it takes to turn around the ship even after the vested parties actually decided to take corrective action.
It is a substantial improvement, and only one that really has started to seen results in the past few years. We are at the point where they are looking at very slowly increasing enrolment again in Canada to match forecasted need with anticipated demographic shifts in patients and retirees.
 
Last edited:
Us has also been an outlet for Canadians.

Absolutely, but the amount of ROs going to the US has also been dropping over the last few years as well. The few ones that continue to do so in the past few years to the best of my knowledge I think are those that are pursuing higher remuneration
The number 3 top Medicare-reimbursed new grad of 2014 in the whole U.S... was a Canadian grad. (Number 1, a lady in Cali. Number 2, a nice guy at MDACC. Both U.S. grads.)
 
Have to give credit here where its do. Most every other program (except Colorado 1 per 4 years and MDACC 1 per year?) are not stepping up like this.

This is true. But I don’t think I’ll be putting my faith in them to do me or any applicant any favors. I can picture the red journal article now about how to academics can deal with less resident coverage by further reducing RTs footprint
 
Of course people won't be satisfied until there are literally zero spots left., but I am happy to see this.

He walks the walk. Has for many years. What it took to get to this point - it's extremely hard in a department if you are not the chair to make these types of decisions. It literally goes against everyone's self interest, yet he made his argument and won it. That's leadership, even if it isn't down to 6 spots.
 
Of course people won't be satisfied until there are literally zero spots left., but I am happy to see this.

He walks the walk. Has for many years. What it took to get to this point - it's extremely hard in a department if you are not the chair to make these types of decisions. It literally goes against everyone's self interest, yet he made his argument and won it. That's leadership, even if it isn't down to 6 spots.

How many of those spots are funded by CMS?

I’m trying to get an idea of how much these people actually “sacrificed”.
 
Does it matter? If every program dropped 1 spot tomorrow, we would be in better shape than we are today. Every little bit helps. I'm not at nihilist point (yet).

I agree with you it’s a step in the right direction. Maybe it’s just my attitude, I am a nihilist when it comes to RO and oncology in general.
 
Not that bold. The need for RT is dropping wayy faster than these mega academic places will address it. Bold would have been going from 12 to 6 and taking applicants every other year and then introducing a fellowship pathway so the grads can give systemics. 12 to 10? Ha!

This is why SDN gets called misanthropes. Guy does a good thing and still gets blasted for it.

Can only hope others follow suit, although not holding my breath. CCF continues to show why it's #1 RO in Cleveland. Dare-say in all of Ohio.
 
I agree with you it’s a step in the right direction. Maybe it’s just my attitude, I am a nihilist when it comes to RO and oncology in general.


You should look into changing jobs. You sound deeply unhappy
 
I agree with you it’s a step in the right direction. Maybe it’s just my attitude, I am a nihilist when it comes to RO and oncology in general.
I am also a nihilist in that I don’t believe reducing spots will have an impact for 15-20 years min, but at least they are starting to take action. Ultimately, a soulution will likely require more than eliminating positions, and entail broadening the field ie systemic, ddiagntostic etc.
 
Personally, i am so excited for the hellpit SOAP coming up. Almost half of resident applicants dual applied. Some of these overconfident PDs/lord of hellpit chairs are in for a bad hang over once the SOAP hits. So much overconfidence! I am sipping my rosé to this!
Girl, so am I, but I don’t know. They are a wily bunch. Let’s see what happens. Maybe they promised them jobs at SERO or Princeton or something.
 
Girl, so am I, but I don’t know. They are a wily bunch. Let’s see what happens. Maybe they promised them jobs at SERO or Princeton or something.
Gonna fight over who gets to be a proton fellow, i mean associate, at sero or inova
 
Last edited:
Top