- Joined
- Sep 21, 2016
- Messages
- 201
- Reaction score
- 385
Like...who has that extra $60,000 lying around for a completely wasted year of schooling?
But it does show that it might be possible. If I were and ADCOM I wold see right through the need for the imagined "status" of MD over the "lowly" DO, but obviously some do not.
Pretty sure you'd just be blackballed for being a med school dropout.
This will never get old -- I love it! I feel like everytime someone uses it they owe @ThoracicGuy a dime.
but if I really didn't like the philosophy as it is applied,
I get accepted to my top choice (hate it for whatever reason) could I respectfully bow out and attend somewhere else and i
Those darned millennials, the only generation ever that older generations have thought was entitled and irresponsibleThere is no philosophy.
No. This is such a millenial view, "oh I made this rash decision and now I'm not so sure about it and I want to switch to something else that I'm not so sure about completely disregarding the money and time of other people"
Or Kanye. He needs the royalty feesThis will never get old -- I love it! I feel like everytime someone uses it they owe @ThoracicGuy a dime.
Also OP: Why would you shoot yourself in the foot? Because that's what this sounds like
I just think that all ADCOMS would rake you over the coals about the "philosophy" differences. What exactly are the differences and why can you not practice medicine with the DO philosophy but now think you can within the MD "philosophy". Medicine is a service & scientific oriented field - not a philosophical venue.
:troll:I didn't ask if I should do it, I asked if it was possible.
Not like it's my go to plan, I was just curious.
What about Caribbean ?
What I would personally argue would be that I can't stand practicing something that the scientific evidence doesn't support (OMM).
Those darned millennials, the only generation ever that older generations have thought was entitled and irresponsible
Edit: I really don't see what's so bad about telling first graders they did a good job when they try hard even if they don't win. They're kids. The time for intense competition is much laterNah the difference is that I am a millennial too and I am appalled at the level of entitlement some of my peers have. It's a product of everyone getting a trophy for everything they do from the age of 6 on.
Edit: I really don't see what's so bad about telling first graders they did a good job when they try hard even if they don't win. They're kids. The time for intense competition is much later
Any data to support the idea that this actually has any significant long-term negative impacts on kids? I just don't buy it, but I'd be happy to read some studies about it if I'm wrong. I've been studying developmental psychology for a few years now and the only thing I've heard is that this has led to a mild spike in narcissism among college students, so the benefits (e.g. increased self-esteem and subjective reports of well-being) of excessive positive reinforcement and insufficient criticism in childhood certainly seem to outweigh the negative consequences, in my opinion.It's not the fact that they are told good job, it's not ever telling them that they are doing something wrong that is the issue.
Thanks. I might watch it on 3x later. Force of habits.Dubs play the Clippers tonight at 10:30 pm (or 7:30 pm for those of you fortunate enough to be on the best coast
Should be a lot more fun than this thread!
Like 2nd grade?Edit: I really don't see what's so bad about telling first graders they did a good job when they try hard even if they don't win. They're kids. The time for intense competition is much later
Haha maybe middle schoolLike 2nd grade?
Haha maybe middle school
Any person who does this clearly doesn't really want to be a physician.
What?Not strictly speaking. A person who does this might just value becoming a physician LESS than appearances. People can have multiple motivations for entering this career pathway.
I'm sure money has nothing to do with your motivation to be in this field? Well then you must be in it for the money and could never be a good physician!!1!!1!1!
What?
Someone who has these kinds of thoughts especially before applying -- dropping out of a program just to attend another clearly wouldn't want it bad enough.
I'm thinking if being a physician AT ALL is the end goal then it wouldn't matter how one gets to that goal.
Talking about motivations to become a physician is an entirely different topic and is irrelevant to this post. Everyone has their own motivations
You are making a disjointed and incoherent argument by moving goals posts.
I'm not defending the motivation.
It's asinine.
but your assertion is irritating suggesting this individual is out of line for asking the question. There are many like him... I'm sure many are DOs right now. Doesn't mean I'm one of them... just means it's dumb but not out of left field entirely.
You are making a disjointed and incoherent argument by moving goals posts.
I'm not defending the motivation.
It's asinine.
but your assertion is irritating suggesting this individual is out of line for asking the question. There are many like him... I'm sure many are DOs right now. Doesn't mean I'm one of them... just means it's dumb but not out of left field entirely.
It's very out of line...whether it's just curiosity or something that others have actually considered or done.
Edit: Also, it's very contradictory to say something is asinine and then follow it up by saying others may have considered this and that it is "dumb but not out of left field."
You either discourage an idea or question or you encourage it, no in between.
I, personally, feel that this questions how bad someone really wants to be a physician not WHY someone wants to be a physician; I'm not being specific here.
At the end of the day, I'm entitled to my opinions and my statements and will respond how I feel fit regardless of whether my arguments come off as incoherent to you. I'm my own person and couldn't care less about your irrelevant examples about motivations to becoming a physician.
You are the one who first judged his(or her) intentions in entering the field. I have been reacting since that time... these are not my "irrelevant examples"... if you look through these threads as long as I have you will see an annual showing of threads regarding DO to MD pathways or conversion of the DO degree, etc. they are typically by premeds who deep-down have fears that they will invest their education into a field that will somehow be less respected, negating their hard work. In some instances, sure, it may be due to vanity... but I don't know that it is fair to judge all who bring this up as being ridiculous. Perhaps guidance would be of greater benefit than judgement.
Who are you to judge what constitutes a "good" physician or to judge who "really wants it"?
That's what humans do, we judge. Just like you made a judgment and called it asinine. What do you think an adcom would do in this situation? Make a judgment.
If this is how you feel, then you owe an argument to everyone here who disagreed or offered their two cents.
You're examples are irrelevant to what my response was about, so yeah it's irrelevant.
I never said anything about being a good or bad physician, you created that idea. Or maybe you JUDGED my posts and arrived at that conclusion.
We can agree to disagree, or whatever applies here. Just keep it at you believing it to be asinine and me questioning how bad someone wants to be a physician.
Why pick my post out of everyone else's to attack my thoughts? Oh you thought I would change my mind or feel ashamed of what I said?
I won't allow you to make me feel as if I should be restricted from responding on here, even if it is SDN.
You can try that oppression on someone else and go take a nap.
I could transfer fine between DOs in my 3rd year
It's a product of everyone getting a trophy for everything they do from the age of 6 on.
See, there's that Millennial sense of entitlement, demanding explanations. Why can't you be more like @AnatomyGrey12 , one of the rare and special Millennials who managed to escape the feeling that they were inherently rare and special?Even if these hypothetical trophies are being handed out, who are the ones doing it? Millennials as well? Did millennial 6 year olds somehow corrupt adults into doing that?
Seriously though let's blame the children. Adults complaining about this had nothing to do with this. While we are at it lets tell people suffering from PTSD that it is their fault.See, there's that Millennial sense of entitlement, demanding explanations. Why can't you be more like @AnatomyGrey12 , one of the rare and special Millennials who managed to escape the feeling that they were inherently rare and special?
In all seriousness, though, I don't think that OP is actually asking if they should go to DO school for a year and then switch to MD school. I'm no expert, so I don't really have an answer to how plausible that scenario is. However, I do wonder if it might have been more or less possible many years ago, when DO and MD were more distinct than they are currently.
Seriously though let's blame the children. Adults complaining about this had nothing to do with this. While we are at it lets tell people suffering from PTSD that it is their fault.