Agreed^
What I don't get is why people think it's no problem to tax the rich more.
Even assuming a flat tax of 20% fed and 5% state to keep things basic, here's the math:
$100k guy pays $25k, $20k guy pays $5k... so $100k guy pays five times as much.
Does the former citizen use the roads, the police, or the public schools five times as much? Does the military protect him five times as much as the latter? No, but he pays it anyways.
...Now, we decide the $100k guy should not only pay the original tax of five times as much, but he should pay maybe six or eight times as much. "He can afford it," right??? But wait... we're not done yet: in addition, Mr. $20k is in "poverty," so we'll give him tons of tax breaks and social services. Between tax deductions and govt programs, he probably gets more govt money than he ever paid in the first place. The nearly one third of America who doesn't pay any taxes obviously is also getting a whole lot of something for nothing. To a lot of yesterday's voters, that sounds pretty good.
What economic socialism basically does is take away incentive to be successful. By educating yourself and gaining higher income, you will be taxed to death. In addition, with extemsive govt control of industries and widespread "cost management" to make services accessible to so many people who pay minimal or no taxes, the educated and skilled working class will also make less income. Wow... double bonus. 🙁