Pgg, I respect the hell out of you based on everything Iāve ever seen you post in this forum. Both your academic/medicine related postings and your political ones are always so well thought out and without undue emotional volatility.
I know youāre a staunch Supreme Court and democracy guy, but I donāt know how the current Supreme Court can be respected these days. To me, admittedly way less educated in all that has been happening for the last 20yrs within this court, they appear to be blatant political puppets actively working on regressive crumbling of case law for the current Right wing goals. And yes, im aware that each āsideā goes out of their way to try to stack the deck but im so sick of the āwell you guys do it too or you guys did something similar x years agoā arguments that have us squabbling over whose crimes are worse. This current generation feels very very different. Iām hoping you can talk some hope into me.
In the past I've mostly agreed with the conservative Justices' reasoning, even if I disliked the outcome (eg Citizens United, Dobbs).
If SCOTUS guts the Voting Rights Act I'll read their opinion, but I don't think I'll be able to defend it. From what I've read of the arguments, I don't know how they'd reason themselves into it beyond some lame statesrights argument.
The Justices sure have become more partisan.
I also think the people bringing cases before the court have gotten a LOT more savvy and strategic about picking their test cases and finding the right wedge to drive into arguments. Pre Gore/Bush it seems people saw something they perceived to be an injustice, filed a case, and went to court. National lobbies to pick test cases in the "right" district court is new. (Or maybe I'm just misremembering some imagined good ol' days.)
Beyond that, the Justices are increasingly choosing to accept or ignore cases unlikely to yield the desired result. This is especially apparent with 2A cases - Heller was 2008, and McDonald (essentially the same case & a logical extension of Heller) followed in 2010, then it was TWELVE more years until Bruen in 2022. That's not because there weren't cases brought between 2010 and 2022, but rather because of the Justices' deliberate (in)action (1) kept weaker cases out and (2) delayed the issue until a conservative majority could materialize.
I was glad for a late win in Bruen as opposed to an early loss in a dozen similar cases, but it bothers me that the courts are being gamed this way, especially with the judges being open participants in the game.
I would favor reform that placed term limits, maybe ideally with a rotation that had a new appointment every 2 years, in non-election years, so presidents would appoint two during their term.
While this hyperpartisanship is here to stay - largely fueled by social media algorithms feeding 24/7 ragebait to everyone - I do think the temperature will turn down when Trump is gone. There's no one like him out there and cults don't have heirs.