- Joined
- Sep 2, 2004
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 388
I guess I'm confused. I still believe that a PT is a PT is a PT.
I'm not sure what programs you are talking about that are one year (12 months of education) longer than the MSPT?
A PT is a PT is a PT as far as the law goes, there is no change in the scope of practice for a PT with bs/ms/dpt, however, with more education, one gets more knowledge. with experience, one gets wisdom. My point being, that a DPT knows more coming out of school than does a MPT, all other things being equal. eg. would you think that in general, a BSN will know more than an RN who went to school for 2 years? I think so. Obviously, a two year RN with 20 years of experience will know more than a new grad BSN, but the capacity of the BSN to learn the why of the treatments/interventions is higher. Their ability to answer the patient's questions is better as well.
Look at the university of Iowa, DesMoines university, U of Minnesota, U of Kansas, Rockhurst U, St Catherines, St Scholastica . . . Most are approximately one year more than what they were when they were masters programs