[earlier post, edited:] While I think it's nice for this guy that he got his MD, i also think he can't practically treat many patients, and am wondering if his school assumes that he'll ever be an independent practitioner. He obviously needs a ton of arrangements and supervision. ...his space could have been used by somone with sight who could become an independent practitioner.
[later post:] We'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think I've been harsh, but I have been interested in understanding how it would be possible for him to become an independent practitioner without the safety net of the medical school helping him to make accommodations, provide supervision, and so on. That doesn't mean that I don't have tremendous respect for what he has done -- it does mean that I am asking valid and important questions about how he could achieve what a sighted person could in medicine while not compromising patient safety, the #1 concern. From a patient's perspective, I wouldn't want to be intubated by a blind physician, or have my rash examined by a blind person. I respect his fund of knowledge, but would be extremely uncomfortable with a physician who couldn't visually examine me. I don't think this implies discrimination -- it simply means that I wouldn't feel safe under those circumstances.
Like I said before, I think psychiatry is an excellent field for this young man, and I am sure he will do well.