- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 2,778
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 4,626
- Location
- Waco, TX
- Resident [Any Field]
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I was just perusing around looking up something unrelated and I found this on the Princeton Review website:
"Osteopathic doctors have a much harder time obtaining residency spots than allopaths, so consider this when deciding whether or not to apply to osteopathic schools. The NRMP also points out that the lower rate for osteopaths is partly due to the fact that they can be appointed outside of the Match. If you want a high-profile residency or career, you should think carefully before applying to an osteopathic medical school, because there is still some prejudice about the prestige of the D.O. degree. On the other hand, if you want to practice primary care (as most D.O.s do), a D.O. degree could be a good choice."
That's a riot. It is so full of misinformation I hardly know where to begin.
My favorite part is "if you want a high-profile residency or career..." Um, what the heck is a "high-profile" career in medicine? Are we talking about rockstars here, or doctors?
I just wanted to assure you pre-med folks that if you feel DO is the right way to go for you, you are not going to have a "much harder time obtaining residency spots." This is completely false and actually the opposite is true because you have all the AOA spots as well as most of the ACGME spots open to you.
Hopefully someone with more time on their hands than me can lobby the PTR to stop spreading lies about the DO degree.
But then again, it makes sense. Of course they discourage applying to DO schools. They want the money from all the desperate pre-meds who think that TPR is their ticket to a 45, and without a 45, their careers in medicine will be dismal, they will be poor, "low profile" and utter failures.
Well, we know better. 🙂
"Osteopathic doctors have a much harder time obtaining residency spots than allopaths, so consider this when deciding whether or not to apply to osteopathic schools. The NRMP also points out that the lower rate for osteopaths is partly due to the fact that they can be appointed outside of the Match. If you want a high-profile residency or career, you should think carefully before applying to an osteopathic medical school, because there is still some prejudice about the prestige of the D.O. degree. On the other hand, if you want to practice primary care (as most D.O.s do), a D.O. degree could be a good choice."
That's a riot. It is so full of misinformation I hardly know where to begin.
My favorite part is "if you want a high-profile residency or career..." Um, what the heck is a "high-profile" career in medicine? Are we talking about rockstars here, or doctors?
I just wanted to assure you pre-med folks that if you feel DO is the right way to go for you, you are not going to have a "much harder time obtaining residency spots." This is completely false and actually the opposite is true because you have all the AOA spots as well as most of the ACGME spots open to you.
Hopefully someone with more time on their hands than me can lobby the PTR to stop spreading lies about the DO degree.
But then again, it makes sense. Of course they discourage applying to DO schools. They want the money from all the desperate pre-meds who think that TPR is their ticket to a 45, and without a 45, their careers in medicine will be dismal, they will be poor, "low profile" and utter failures.
Well, we know better. 🙂
You're funny. Lots of people would agree with me that it is a bit harder to specialize and get into a tough residency as a DO vs an MD. My FP who is a DO told me this and if I wanted to even do general surgery I should go to Temple instead of a DO school.
