- Joined
- Aug 8, 2007
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi Docs !
Need your advise.I have 4th Ed BRS Path and new RR Path.
After reading the section abt "Heart" in both the books, just feel that BRS leaves out a lot of info.Although it is condensed, i just feel there is a lot of material that is not covered which are covered in RR.For example, in complications of MI, BRS does not talk abt early and late pericarditis at all ! ( which is very clearly discussed in RR)
Do I assume that the minimal condensed info in BRS is enough for step 1 and RR is a bit too much ?
The fact that BRS is 300 pages less than RR -does it mean it could possibly omit certain areas in any given topic ?!! Shd I just get hold of RR and keep aside BRS ?
I like the way RR explains concepts.But still BRS is a quick read.
Appreciate your time and valuable input.Thank you
Need your advise.I have 4th Ed BRS Path and new RR Path.
After reading the section abt "Heart" in both the books, just feel that BRS leaves out a lot of info.Although it is condensed, i just feel there is a lot of material that is not covered which are covered in RR.For example, in complications of MI, BRS does not talk abt early and late pericarditis at all ! ( which is very clearly discussed in RR)
Do I assume that the minimal condensed info in BRS is enough for step 1 and RR is a bit too much ?
The fact that BRS is 300 pages less than RR -does it mean it could possibly omit certain areas in any given topic ?!! Shd I just get hold of RR and keep aside BRS ?
I like the way RR explains concepts.But still BRS is a quick read.
Appreciate your time and valuable input.Thank you