The only claim to neutrality is if you are unaware of the act. Once you are privy to the act, you're immediately given the choice to either act against it or act in a manner that facilitates it. There is no bystander option because if you're the only one that notices, you are the only one that can make that call. The "not my problem" attitude is what gets even more people in
more trouble because then management thinks, "Well, if they knew this was going on and didn't speak up, then what else could they be hiding?" even if there is actually nothing else being covered up. Goro's quote about evil triumphing when good men do nothing is spot on.
>is the bigger man
>troll
So if there was an empty spot and you took it, how would you feel if
you were the one called out for taking an attending's spot? Your post makes it sound as if there are actually assigned spaces and not just permited first come first served. So assuming that's the case, would you rat out the guy who is there without a permit? Your other posts on similar matters would say no, yet here you are ratting them out. Why? Because it's
not a victimless crime.
It's not that cheating in college is a victimless crime or whatever keep your head down 'cuh and do you; it's that if the person never gets reprimanded for it (and
most cheaters don't ever get their dues), then they will develop a habit of cheating to the point where they might think it's okay to fudge a patient's vitals because they don't want to deal with the attending asking them to run another time-consuming test. And what if that test would have found something malignant?
Calling out cheaters in UG is not even about the curve or the grade or even someone else getting something that they don't deserve. It's about making sure that person realizes that they can't keep going through life doing things like that, no matter what field they end up in.