Hi @Asa17 , I have posted this before but maybe my post got submerged in the thread. It is very crucial to note that CCSCASES is promoting very wrong scoring protocols. Unfortunately,
CCSCASES.COM has been able to sell themselves showing this wrong scoring method claiming this is how they differentiate themselves from
UWORLD and
**********.
A couple of friends of mine have committed blunders on their CCS because they were misguided by their dubious scoring system and then, ended up failing. I can give you several examples apart from the one you mentioned
1. CCSCASES software wants you to put screening orders on ED patients as well on 2 min screen. This is dangerous in unstable patients and in case of stable patients, this type of approach makes you focus on things you do not need rather than what you actually need on a 2-min screen. CCSCASES sequencing with regard to many cases on their system is also incorrect. I can not post many of their wrong cases here due to copyright issues but you should be aware of their errors. For understanding what you need to place on a 2-min screen for a variety of cases and how to best use simulated time in 10-min cases and also, how to sequence the orders appropriately, watch **********.
2. As you mentioned, CCSCASES allots a score to certain wrong interventions and unnecessary screening orders and to some other non-essential orders. When you are being scored for this nonsense, you get the impression that these must be placed on the exam. When you end up doing that, you lose valuable time on a 10-minute case during which other orders could have been placed. If the order that CCSCASES gave you a score for, is
unnecessary and also
invasive, you will end up getting a failing score on that case because unnecessary INVASIVE measures get a negative scoring on the exam. For example; you have an MI patient and you added a screening colonoscopy on a 2-min screen without regard to simulated time, you will get a negative score for placing a stressful intervention in the immediate post-MI period. There are several cases like that on that CCSCASES software which is totally misleading an unsuspecting step3 aspirant.
3. Placing emergency orders in a distressed patient before a physical exam is a correct approach. So, what you did was absolutely correct. If you are being penalized by this wrong and misleading ccscases software for a correct approach, you are going to commit this wrong sequential strategy on the exam which can be dangerous to patients and lead to losing valuable simulated time.
Maybe it is time to stop using that erroneous software to prevent yourself from being misguided. PLEASE DOWNLOAD ACTUAL EXAM SOFTWARE FROM USMLE.ORG and practice using the methods taught by **********.
Please follow the criterion standard
********** strategies to get this correct approach of Diagnosis, Location, Timing, Monitoring, and Sequencing where Archer uses exact USMLE software to demonstrate the cases. Archer shows protocols for many important cases and explains every step using the official exam software in their workshop videos I think that is the best for learning CCS and for practice, you can use always use additional UWorld software because at least, UWorld will not penalize you for the correct approach by giving you incorrect scoring since UWorld will not score you.
I wish you all the best. Please feel free to ask me any questions.