Centripetal Force Q

brandonh4

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Jun 14, 2011
236
2
  1. Pre-Medical
    Two identical objects are rotating in a uniform circle about the earth. One object is twice the distance from the center of the earth as the other. What is the ratio of the centripetal forces acting on the objects?

    a) 1/2
    b) 1/4
    c) 1/8
    d) 1/16

    Help please.
     

    brandonh4

    Full Member
    5+ Year Member
    Jun 14, 2011
    236
    2
    1. Pre-Medical
      F=ma. For uniform circular motion, a=v^2/r and F=mv^2/r. Twice the radius means half the force -> A.

      That's what I thought too. This is a Q from a TBR FL, and they say the answer is 1/4. Because the centripetal force is supplied by gravity, they equate the centripetal force with the gravitational force. Therefore the force is proportional to 1/r^2, not 1/r.
       

      milski

      1K member
      5+ Year Member
      Dec 30, 2009
      2,641
      527
      Where the rain grows
      1. Pre-Medical
        That's what I thought too. This is a Q from a TBR FL, and they say the answer is 1/4. Because the centripetal force is supplied by gravity, they equate the centripetal force with the gravitational force. Therefore the force is proportional to 1/r^2, not 1/r.

        They have a very good point. What I wrote would be true if the objects were rotating around Earth at the same angular velocity which is certainly not the case here. In other words - ops, I was wrong.
         
        About the Ads

        brandonh4

        Full Member
        5+ Year Member
        Jun 14, 2011
        236
        2
        1. Pre-Medical
          They have a very good point. What I wrote would be true if the objects were rotating around Earth at the same angular velocity which is certainly not the case here. In other words - ops, I was wrong.

          Hmm... so if it were to state that the velocities were the same, the centripetal force would now be proportional to r^-1 rather than r^-2?

          I'm just confused because they don't offer different velocities as one of their reasons to use the gravitational force equation rather than centripetal force equation.
           

          pfaction

          Full Member
          10+ Year Member
          Mar 14, 2010
          2,225
          79
          WV
          1. Resident [Any Field]
            Oh my ****ing god. Did they do this?

            FGrav = Fac
            GMm/rsq = Fac
            mass is the same since they're identical
            GMm/rsq = Fac

            What douchebags. Now it makes sense.

            GMm/rsq = Fac of object 1
            GMm/rsq = Fac of object 2

            They're saying the gravitational causes the centrip acceleration, which is true, and not asking you to solve any further.
            I would have also done Fac = mv^2/r to get 1/2. ****.
             

            chiddler

            Full Member
            10+ Year Member
            Apr 6, 2010
            2,439
            4
            1. Medical Student
              Hmm... so if it were to state that the velocities were the same, the centripetal force would now be proportional to r^-1 rather than r^-2?

              I'm just confused because they don't offer different velocities as one of their reasons to use the gravitational force equation rather than centripetal force equation.

              if you state that angular velocity is the same, then it is r^-1. since linear velocities are the same in this case, angular velocity drops.

              alpha = v/r

              as r increases while v stays constant, alpha decreases.
               

              pfaction

              Full Member
              10+ Year Member
              Mar 14, 2010
              2,225
              79
              WV
              1. Resident [Any Field]
                what i don't understand is how to come to the conclusion that angular velocities differ in each. my thinking was hold everything else constant - distance changes. therefore, it is half.

                what prompts one to look at the gravitational force equation?

                TPR says you should be asking "what causes centripedal acceleration", so in this case, it's FGrav... I would have never thought of this on my exam. :thumbdown:thumbdown
                 

                brandonh4

                Full Member
                5+ Year Member
                Jun 14, 2011
                236
                2
                1. Pre-Medical
                  Oh my ****ing god. Did they do this?

                  Yes, but now you have 2 conflict equations, one that says it's proportional to 1/r and one that says it's proportional to 1/r^2. The best reasoning for using the gravitational equation was brought up by saying that, since the velocities were not stated to be equal, you can't use the centripetal force equation, whereas everything is constant except r in the gravitational force equation.

                  If I'm understanding things right...
                   
                  About the Ads

                  Tots

                  Full Member
                  Moderator Emeritus
                  10+ Year Member
                  Verified Expert
                  Nov 24, 2008
                  4,147
                  296
                  California
                  1. Medical Student
                    F=ma. For uniform circular motion, a=v^2/r and F=mv^2/r. Twice the radius means half the force -> A.

                    Using that equation assumes that their tangential velocities are equal, which is not the case. The tangential velocity is also dependent on the radius from earth. The easiest way to solve this is set centripetal force and then using the gravitational force equation, exactly how TBR explains.
                     

                    brandonh4

                    Full Member
                    5+ Year Member
                    Jun 14, 2011
                    236
                    2
                    1. Pre-Medical
                      Using that equation assumes that their tangential velocities are equal, which is not the case. The tangential velocity is also dependent on the radius from earth. The easiest way to solve this is set centripetal force and then using the gravitational force equation, exactly how TBR explains.

                      Couldn't you achieve the same tangential velocity just by launching the farther satellite it into orbit... I don't know, with more velocity?
                       

                      chiddler

                      Full Member
                      10+ Year Member
                      Apr 6, 2010
                      2,439
                      4
                      1. Medical Student
                        Using that equation assumes that their tangential velocities are equal, which is not the case. The tangential velocity is also dependent on the radius from earth. The easiest way to solve this is set centripetal force and then using the gravitational force equation, exactly how TBR explains.

                        he corrects himself two posts down.
                         

                        milski

                        1K member
                        5+ Year Member
                        Dec 30, 2009
                        2,641
                        527
                        Where the rain grows
                        1. Pre-Medical
                          There's nothing conflicting about the two equations. F=mv^2/r is correct but both v and r change, so you cannot say anything directly from here unless you calculate what the magnitude of the velocity will be. It's much easier to consider that the only force acting is gravity and use that it is proportional to 1/r^2, like Tatertots said.
                           

                          milski

                          1K member
                          5+ Year Member
                          Dec 30, 2009
                          2,641
                          527
                          Where the rain grows
                          1. Pre-Medical
                            Couldn't you achieve the same tangential velocity just by launching the farther satellite it into orbit... I don't know, with more velocity?

                            For a given tangential velocity there will be one acceleration (and one force) which keeps the body in uniform circular motion. If you vary the force, you can vary the velocity at which the body rotates around earth at a fixed distance. But since there are no additional forces described in the problem, the only force is due to gravity. That means that for a certain distance there will only one velocity at which UCM continues. That velocity will be different for different r.


                            ---
                            I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?ph0bqo
                             

                            Tots

                            Full Member
                            Moderator Emeritus
                            10+ Year Member
                            Verified Expert
                            Nov 24, 2008
                            4,147
                            296
                            California
                            1. Medical Student
                              Couldn't you achieve the same tangential velocity just by launching the farther satellite it into orbit... I don't know, with more velocity?
                              Nope. The tangential velocity is a result of the gravitational force and that's it in tho question. See milaki below for a good explanation.
                              he corrects himself two posts down.
                              Yeah I saw- I was slow. Took me 10 minutes to answer because my PI interrupted me.
                              For a given tangential velocity there will be one acceleration (and one force) which keeps the body in uniform circular motion. If you vary the force, you can vary the velocity at which the body rotates around earth at a fixed distance. But since there are no additional forces described in the problem, the only force is due to gravity. That means that for a certain distance there will only one velocity at which UCM continues. That velocity will be different for different r.


                              ---
                              I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?ph0bqo

                              This times 100. Remember Keplers laws - velocity is dependent on the radius of orbit.
                               

                              pfaction

                              Full Member
                              10+ Year Member
                              Mar 14, 2010
                              2,225
                              79
                              WV
                              1. Resident [Any Field]
                                There's nothing conflicting about the two equations. F=mv^2/r is correct but both v and r change, so you cannot say anything directly from here unless you calculate what the magnitude of the velocity will be. It's much easier to consider that the only force acting is gravity and use that it is proportional to 1/r^2, like Tatertots said.

                                a) Is this likely to appear on the test?
                                b) How would you be able to differentiate it?!
                                 

                                chiddler

                                Full Member
                                10+ Year Member
                                Apr 6, 2010
                                2,439
                                4
                                1. Medical Student
                                  a) Is this likely to appear on the test?
                                  b) How would you be able to differentiate it?!

                                  a. possible.

                                  b. we have to ask ourselves some questions. first of all, what is changing in this question? we see that as radius increases, velocity changes too due to a changing force.

                                  looking at F=mv^2/r, does it make sense to use this equation when there are three variables changing? no. what is an alternative so we can compare only two?

                                  gravitational force works, since masses of the objects are constant and we can compare radius and force directly.

                                  the important thing to learn, having read this thread, is that just because the question does not explicitly say velocity is changing doesn't mean you count out the possibility.
                                   
                                  About the Ads

                                  pfaction

                                  Full Member
                                  10+ Year Member
                                  Mar 14, 2010
                                  2,225
                                  79
                                  WV
                                  1. Resident [Any Field]
                                    the important thing to learn, having read this thread, is that just because the question does not explicitly say velocity is changing doesn't mean you count out the possibility.

                                    That's exactly what I didn't know/remember, that as radius increases the velocity decreases, so two variables no good - have to focus on one that works for both.
                                     

                                    Tots

                                    Full Member
                                    Moderator Emeritus
                                    10+ Year Member
                                    Verified Expert
                                    Nov 24, 2008
                                    4,147
                                    296
                                    California
                                    1. Medical Student
                                      That's exactly what I didn't know/remember, that as radius increases the velocity decreases, so two variables no good - have to focus on one that works for both.

                                      As the radius increases velocity decreases when something is in orbit(because angular velocity is not the same) with gravity but don't let this confuse your general circular motion questions. If two objects traveling in circular motion have the same w then the one with the largest radius is going to have the highest tangential velocity because v=rw.
                                       

                                      milski

                                      1K member
                                      5+ Year Member
                                      Dec 30, 2009
                                      2,641
                                      527
                                      Where the rain grows
                                      1. Pre-Medical
                                        a) Is this likely to appear on the test?
                                        b) How would you be able to differentiate it?!

                                        On the phone, so tl;dr only:

                                        A) It's a good question, I would use it if I was writing the test.
                                        B) There is no distinction to be made - UCM is UCM and the formulas hold. What went wrong for me and OP is that we assumed the velocities are the same. There is nothing in the problem indicating that. You can start with that equation, derive what the velocities will be, plug them in and get the same result.
                                         

                                        pfaction

                                        Full Member
                                        10+ Year Member
                                        Mar 14, 2010
                                        2,225
                                        79
                                        WV
                                        1. Resident [Any Field]
                                          As the radius increases velocity decreases when something is in orbit(because angular velocity is not the same) with gravity but don't let this confuse your general circular motion questions. If two objects traveling in circular motion have the same w then the one with the largest radius is going to have the highest tangential velocity because v=rw.

                                          So in our problem, if they both had the same w, would the one traveling 2r away have a higher velocity? And thus higher centrip accel?
                                           

                                          milski

                                          1K member
                                          5+ Year Member
                                          Dec 30, 2009
                                          2,641
                                          527
                                          Where the rain grows
                                          1. Pre-Medical

                                            Tatiana3325

                                            Membership Revoked
                                            Removed
                                            Apr 4, 2012
                                            5,646
                                            0
                                            Winter of our discontent
                                            1. Pre-Medical
                                              d^2χ/dt^2=-k^2(1+m) χ/r^3+Σi k^2mj [(χj-χ/ρj^3) – (χj/rj^3)]

                                              This is the general equation of motion of a planet or comet (m) with the sun as origin of coordinates. m subscript j is the action of disturbing planets. This same equation can be used for the motion of a satellite around its primary.

                                              Newton only describes the forces acting between two point masses that are inertial, not rotating or subject to acceleration. If the distance between m subscript a and m subscript b is r, then thf force acting between them is

                                              F=k^2mamb/r^2

                                              K depends on units of mass, time and length. If the sun, for example is taken as unity and mean solar day and astronomical unit as length then k= Gaussian constant (0.01720209895) this is exact.
                                               
                                              Last edited:

                                              chiddler

                                              Full Member
                                              10+ Year Member
                                              Apr 6, 2010
                                              2,439
                                              4
                                              1. Medical Student
                                                d^2χ/dt^2=-k^2(1+m) χ/r^3+Σi k^2mj [(χj-χ/ρj^3) – (χj/rj^3)]

                                                This is the general equation of motion of a planet or comet (m) with the sun as origin of coordinates. m subscript j is the action of disturbing planets. This same equation can be used for the motion of a satellite around its primary.

                                                well duh. so obvious! how could we forget this crucial equation!
                                                 

                                                Tatiana3325

                                                Membership Revoked
                                                Removed
                                                Apr 4, 2012
                                                5,646
                                                0
                                                Winter of our discontent
                                                1. Pre-Medical
                                                  well duh. so obvious! how could we forget this crucial equation!

                                                  Well if I had said that solar system dynamics were not really Newtonian you would have dismissed my comment.

                                                  That mcat question in the initial post is vague by the way. But I'm sure you guys can figure it out. You're over thinking it.
                                                   
                                                  Last edited:

                                                  chiddler

                                                  Full Member
                                                  10+ Year Member
                                                  Apr 6, 2010
                                                  2,439
                                                  4
                                                  1. Medical Student
                                                    Well if I had said that solar system dynamics were not really Newtonian you would have dismissed my comment.

                                                    That mcat question in the initial post is dumb by the way. Its really vague but I'm sure you guys can figure it out. You're over thinking it.

                                                    all i meant was that the equation you posted wouldn't really help here because the vast majority of premeds are not well versed with such physics equations.

                                                    but that was rude of me anyway, sorry.
                                                     
                                                    This thread is more than 9 years old.

                                                    Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

                                                    1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
                                                    2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                                                    3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                                                    4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
                                                    5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
                                                    6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                                                    7. This thread is locked.