certificate program vs. do-it-yourself

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

emeraldsky

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hello everyone--

does anyone know how much more advantageous it is to do your post-bacc courses through an official certificate program? there are non-certificate programs out there that i am considering. and i am also considering just a do-it-yourself, enrolling as a regular part-time student.

how important is it to have a certificate when applying to med school?

thanks in advance for the insight.
 
For the most part, a certificate is usually intended to make the student feel better, and that they are getting something out of it even if they don't get into med school. Med schools will look at the classes you take, and how well you did rather than seeing what degrees and certificates you hold.

A certificate is not a bachelors, masters or doctorate degree. So I don't think they care.😉
 
Also realize that not all structured programs are certificate programs. As I see it, the advantage of a structured program is the support system, the advisement etc. But beyond this I don't feel like there is any advantage to receiving a certificate or not.
 
Also realize that not all structured programs are certificate programs. As I see it, the advantage of a structured program is the support system, the advisement etc. But beyond this I don't feel like there is any advantage to receiving a certificate or not.
The point of a structured program, IMO, is reputation. If you take classes at a local school and do well, an ADCOM thinks "good job". But if you take classes @ HES and do well, an ADCOM thinks "wow, that's a tough program - great job".

Search on this - plus/minus are easy to find.
 
The point of a structured program, IMO, is reputation. If you take classes at a local school and do well, an ADCOM thinks "good job". But if you take classes @ HES and do well, an ADCOM thinks "wow, that's a tough program - great job".

Search on this - plus/minus are easy to find.

Talking about school reputation is just beating a dead horse. If plays such a role during post-bacc, then it would probably play a bigger role as an undergrad since you took more classes. But as many have pointed out, reputation only plays a small role, especially when grades are similar, but this effect is diluted due to the various other variables involved with med school admissions. Since as post-baccs, we do not have majors, and courses will vary among students, programs, and schools, then the level of comparison between post-bacc programs, and applicants becomes less and less comparable. From my perspective, I could have applied to UC Davis' post-bacc program, or even UCSF's post-bacc program. Given their UC status, I would consider them to be a "big name", especially UCSF. Despite being overshadowed by UCSF's name, UCD's post-bacc program is still up to par in terms of successful applicants (>80%).

Really in all honesty, if "difficulty of a program" and the school's name was such a big deal. One might as well do a graduate program (non-SMP) at a reputable school. Surely a biomedical-related MS, or PhD looks better than a year or two at HES? But as we have found out, that is also highly variable in nature.

But I must digress, the topic of this thread is regards to certificate vs. non-certificate earning programs. Not all structured programs result in a certificate. As famous as UCSF is, their post-bacc program does not report granting any certificates, nor do the other UC's, however UC post-bacc programs often report the same >80% success rate (in getting into med school). Therefore, as I stated, it doesn't matter if you get a certificate, however taking a rigorous courseload at any school and doing well is most important. Where you go depends on you the applicant. One must weigh many factors including cost, time, etc.
 
Top