- Joined
- Oct 17, 2006
- Messages
- 1,444
- Reaction score
- 5
I would be damn near shocked if you knew the difference between rib raising and picking your nose. (I was going to say "scratching your ass" but I thought it might come across as malignant)
Congrats, you have found me out. I'm a MD-wanna be who merely tolerated OMM to become an physician. Go ahead and fathom your own greatness in your own mind and go ahead and tell yourself that really have these great prognostic abilities when it comes to knowing anything about a semi-anonymous person on an internet chat room. While you are at it, why don't you throw in a few Goodwin's Law violations? I was very active in the UAAO and an officer, and I have bee to several AAO conventions, I may not have taken a whole extra year extra for OMT, but don't for a moment think that this alone gives you the supreme moral authority to determine who does and doesn't know how to utilize OMM
So youre a watchdog group looking out for the best interests of practicing osteopathic physicians?
Again, thank you for putting words in my mouth.
By complaining about COMLEX and for-profit schools?
Yes, those were the only two issues which I've mentioned.
My big question is this: Will the group have a secret hand shake? If so I might be in...actually I would like some super cool "organizational clothing" too, like a fez with a bone on it and some harry potter like robes.
Despite JP's assertions to the others, the only reason why there are not names and complete disclosure of everything at this point is because this is simply planning phase. There is no organization, there are no members, there are no officer. There literally is nothing to disclose.
This is silly, why not start a secret organization to make DOs what they should be, "better than", instead of trying to push us all back and make us the "same as".
I'm not sure where you're getting this idea. I've stated several times that we should simply hold ourselves to a higher standard. And I've never promoted conformity, simply improvement.
In all seriousness, JP - perhaps you are correct and the listening audience is misinformed and inexperienced. Perhaps you have more insight into the plight of osteopathic medicine. Instead of pointing out the flawed ideas being discussed, why not help cultivate them so that they represent the entire osteopathic community, not just the misinformed students. You say that you have prior commitments (your residency) but if you have time to criticize, couldn't you find time to help out?
Unfortunately, not every Osteopathic medical student or physician is lucky enough to have their own personal JP to inform about the issues. Perhaps this is another reason why such an organization is needed? Instead of obtaining Daily Reports which don't contain much in the way of real updates?
I have already pointed out several more important issues and have tried to correct the misinformation.
And yes you fail to realize that 2/3 of your issues would require direct lobbying to legislation which would be extremely cumbersome and require much legal hoop jumping to set that organization up. Organizations which participate in lobbying and political campaigning are required by law to register and are highly scrutinized and regulated by the IRS. That is not the initial goal of the proposed organization, and should be rightfully left to the AOA. Any input from the proposed organization's end would be simply to encourage the AOA's input and action in the legislation.
Actually, I was probably just disagreeing with you because I dont like you. But you can perceive it any way you like.
Shocking.