- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 6,292
- Reaction score
- 7
Watermelon, here is one for you 


Is it to the same quality that a Stradivarius is for violins?
I dunno about that, but it's one of the premier piano makers, that's for sure.
What's wrong with Simon & Garfunkel? I don't think that's embarrassing or anything.
I'll give you a list of artists with one of their better songs IMO.
- Amos Lee - Seen It All Before
- Ben Harper - Walk Away
- Bon Iver - Skinny Love
- Ray LaMontagne - Shelter
- Teitur - I Was Just Thinking
I have more but I'll just start off with five.
Stradivarius is much older than Steinway. Stradivarius, as you may or may not know, is the well-recognized family (from Italy?) that made string instruments several centuries ago.
Steinway just makes very well-designed pianos and they're recognized as the best in the business (currently).
Stradivarius string instruments have a special resonance that creates a particularly aesthetically pleasing tone (because they're made from wood that's specially prepared). They're also very durable and have lasted for centuries -- in general there are very few Strads whereas Steinways are everywhere.
Steinway is still doing business. Lots of business. Still making pianos. I'm not sure exactly what's so special about them except that they tend to get the best tone (from experience). They're just widely recognized.
I think Teitur was the best, and then a very distant second was Ray LaMontagne... Bon Iver was not bad, but I did not like Amos Lee or Ben Harper...
Interesting...
Pianola, do you have a steinway?
To each their own I guess. Let me know if you want some other recommendations.
Haha, not a Steinway grand. Yamaha's are the best for uprights -- and I have a Yamaha upright.
A Steinway grand would likely cost more than my entire medical education [😱].
I love Steinway grands, though. They're delicious. Like a very fine French dessert.
I am listening to Sleep with the lights on by Teitur...and Duffy is pretty good also...
See, I told you I was picky...
ok, i need to go run some errands.
later dudes!![]()
pianos, lolcats, think I'm caught up. good afternoon 🙂
Yeah I think she's very good. There's a lot of up-and-coming soul singers out there now, what with Joss Stone, Amy Winehouse, Adele and also Duffy (if you've heard of her).
Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings are excellent as well.
Wow, chasing pavements was really good... 👍
Any other songs or artists you guys would recommend?
whoa, she's got a great voice! 👍
great video too, so creative.
anyone ever seen 'ace of cakes' on food network? that seems like a fun place to work.
i wish that place was in my area.
That is one of the things drawing me to UMD... since it is in Baltimore also😳
I can't stand Duffy. Ever hear her live? Yech... I only judge singers by their live performances.
Yeah I saw her on SNL and she was pretty bad, I'll admit. Maybe it was just an off-day though.
Yeah I saw her on SNL and she was pretty bad, I'll admit. Maybe it was just an off-day though.
Kanye-West-Auto-Tune-Disaster bad?
C'mon people. I've got an hour to kill while I wait for this autoclave. Amuse me!
...Please??
It goes well! How bout you?Hey berken! How goes it?
So has anyone ever made an Atlantic ocean voyage before? I want to look into doing one for this summer.
SameVia...plane?
Yes...
Via ship? No.
It goes well! How bout you?
Ugh.... I am so bored in undergrad....
Haha, would you be happier if you had to read a bunch of journal articles of varying quality? (= grad school).
I think so...
So I did a quick google search to find some funny job titles (I'm a little tired w/ having the same "MS 0" title that everyone seems to have, and it doesn't seem so clever when EVERYONE does it 😛), and though I don't think I'll use any of these, I was amused
"Skull Grinder," "Chick Sexer," "Mother Repairer," "Bat Cave Scavenger," "PHP Ninja," "Debubblizer..." they go on forever 😀
OK, I am now accepting votes for 'the most annoying journal'.
My vote for today: PNAS. The journal is structured all backwards with the materials and methods near the end (as if materials and methods were 'no big deal'). A pretty large number of the submissions (maybe 80% or so) are crap or near-crap -- poorly thought up or executed or explained -- because they are only 'sort-of peer reviewed'. And by 'sort-of peer-reviewed', I mean you can probably get your buddy from grad school to read over your submission and say 'yup, looks good to me.'
/rant.
Does PNAS stand for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences?
Yeah, the best journals usually say "Journal of..." or one word like "Nature."
Does PNAS stand for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences?
Yeah, the best journals usually say "Journal of..." or one word like "Nature."
PNAS is one of the best journals. It's organized so you can quickly extract info when you are already pretty proficient in the methods