- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
- Messages
- 3,586
- Reaction score
- 298
That's what I heard from other physicians, but you'd get some awesome rec letters if you do rotations at those places. In general, private practices like the two clinics won't give you much hands on experience as med students.

Yes, I am sure there are situations and particular departments (or even whole fields) that let medical students to less than others. This is true at any hospital. Not every rotation is going to have you doing chest compressions on patients that are coding a la 'ER'.
But to label whole institutions or a type of school as being more or less 'hands-on' is misguided at the very least.
Remember, medical school (and life in general) is more about what you make of it. Any decent medical school will afford their students lots of opportunities to have hands on experience.
In fact, I dare say at ANY US M.D. or D.O. medical school you will have more opportunities than you can entertain. The school doesn't make your experience hands-on: You do.
Also, someone may correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think residency directors are under any obligation to write good letters. Letters are not rubber-stamped and must be earned anywhere you go.
Furthermore, just like LORs for your medical school applications, I think what makes an recommendation letter awesome is the content much more than the figurehead or title of the writer.
That LOR content will be based completely on how you perform. In short, I think you could get a crappy or glowing letter just as easily at Mayo as you could at Mass Gen. Why? Not because of the letter writer - but because of you.
And I only pointed all this out because I think it does a disservice to people applying this upcoming cycle who read this thread to imply how an hospital is funded/organized necessarily determines your experiences on rotations.