• Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Clinical Research not as valuable as science?

DoctorLacrosse

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Jan 18, 2012
1,921
2,166
141
The Intrawebz
  1. Medical Student
So I searched and haven't found anything recent. In past threads I think I remember seeing people saying that in the eyes of Adcoms, basic science/bench research is viewed as much better than clinical research. Is this really true?

I ask because I currently do clinical research in the emergency department of a big hospital where I'm from. I have ZERO significant basic science research, and frankly am not too interested in it. I get to do research and converse with patients all day. Wouldn't this be even better? or Will this hurt me at all? I need to have my app be as good as possible due to my lower GPA. I'll have two years total by the time I apply, and no pubs most likely. Anyone have any insight on this?
 
About the Ads

MedPR

Membership Revoked
Removed
Dec 1, 2011
18,579
52
181
  1. Pre-Podiatry
Any hypothesis driven research is valuable. Do what you can get that interests you. Publications are the icing on the cake.

Doesn't matter at this level. Residency applications might be a different story.


Sounds good to me. One interviewer and I talked about my research (I've done basic science and clinical) and after telling him about my experience I asked him which he thought was more beneficial for applicants. He said it didn't make much difference because the knowledge base of most premeds isn't significant enough to accomplish a whole lot. I'm inclined to believe him. Columbia MD, WashU for ortho.


Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
 

DoctorLacrosse

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Jan 18, 2012
1,921
2,166
141
The Intrawebz
  1. Medical Student
Sounds good to me. One interviewer and I talked about my research (I've done basic science and clinical) and after telling him about my experience I asked him which he thought was more beneficial for applicants. He said it didn't make much difference because the knowledge base of most premeds isn't significant enough to accomplish a whole lot. I'm inclined to believe him. Columbia MD, WashU for ortho.


Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile

haha thank goodness. and whoa, impressive credentials. I'll have to take his word for it also lol
 

MedPR

Membership Revoked
Removed
Dec 1, 2011
18,579
52
181
  1. Pre-Podiatry
haha thank goodness. and whoa, impressive credentials. I'll have to take his word for it also lol

Yea I got more nervous when I saw the diplomas on the wall in his office.

He had his UG on the wall too. Can't remember which school but I do remember it being one that is held in very high regard.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
 

saveourpens

Full Member
10+ Year Member
May 12, 2008
850
120
266
  1. Resident [Any Field]
It's hard to be an independent clinical researcher when patients are involved with no MD or PhD. At best, you'll be analyzing data, interviewing participants, following up...it can be a worthwhile experience though because you get to work with patients and are involved in research simultaneously.

Basic science is much more suited towards leading a project.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

pooghe

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jan 8, 2009
236
1
201
Midwest
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I'm extremely glad to hear that. really didn't want to have to seek out another position right now that I don't have time for with work.

On that subject though, what do residency programs prefer?

For residency, it depends on what specialty you are interested in and what kind of program you want to match at. Some prefer basic science, others clinical, and others don't care.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 8 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.