#interviewcaps
Wait until you are mediocre applicant applying to competitive specialty but somehow manage some top-solid programs for your top 1-10, then are forced to cap at 15...realistically you only have real at chance at 5 programs...also the programs i thot I would get interview at whether in term of competitiveness or location, I did not, so app cap also has its limitation. Again there is no perfect solution but putting limitations on applicants is not one. We all work at least 8 years toward this day...the system is ****. As applicants, why don’t we try to focus on fixing the system that is broken instead of trying to limit each other lol. One thing I learn so far is this process is stressful as hell...I can’t imagine having to limit app and/or interviews...end up not matching...n wondering what if...
Token is like cap according to my understanding...🤷♀️ Will see ENT people and whether it will work.
Even with interviews...I also mentioned it above. My top 10 is top-solid programs where I looked at residents who matched there previously, I have low to no chance...if interview cap at 15...that means I only have real chance at 5...do you or anyone want to be in the position to give up your top programs to ensure match or take the risk of matching by only having real chance at 5? Also for this to work, programs will have to release interview invites at the same times.
A man who knows how to stay married. *High five*
So you’re arguing that you expect you’ll fall below your #10 spot? I’ll wish you better than that since it seems like an anomalous bet against yourself.
Yeah unfortunately looking at residents who matched there especially where most if not all came from JH, Harvard etc big names. Applicants from lower schools like me may get interviews but the chance to actually match there is low to none when I look at current residents, their med schools, achievement, and pubs...In surg subspec, normally, subI is how students from “lower” schools match at top programs. This year without subI programs probably rely more on apps, school name, connections, scores, pubs, etc...this is just my speculations and what I have been told at conferences/mentors...etc
This argument is always interesting to me because it places the interests of the most privileged 5-10% above the interests of the other 90-95% The majority of people won’t hit the interview cap and will be benefited by having the opportunity to go on more interviews. And those that do end up hitting the cap will not even be disadvantaged meaningfully in my view because they will already have an abundance of choice before hitting the cap.
I really don't think interview caps solve the problem, which is stemming from the fact that PDs need to read too many applications. Sheriff of sodium does a good job explaining why application caps are a necessity here.
what about app tokens
I think app tokens are a good stop-gap measure, but the real solution is application caps. I've seen everybody arguing that they got interviews from reaches and random programs they never would have applied to with application caps, but I actually think this is an argument FOR capping. The system right now is extremely random and doesn't give applicants a good way to demonstrate genuine interest. App tokens would help with that, but the overapplying still happens, which limits the programs' ability to critically review applications.
I think application caps could work, but only if programs are willing to provide enough data that applicants can make informed choices of whether or not they are a good fit for that program. And even with that, it would be a heavy lift in smaller specialities where intangibles like LOR connections, presumed cultural connection, and undergrad prestige can and do have real effects.
Yay for being done! I had the opposite experience where a program I had planned to rank low, because I assumed everyone would be super full of themselves/gunners and I didn't think they could possibly be seriously interested in me compared to other candidates, wowed me. My interviewers were super nice, they literally said "we don't take gunners" as part of the interview day, and their interest in me seemed genuine. Now I'm like "Dammit, this messes with a rank list I felt I had basically sorted out."
I actually had that same experience earlier this month at another program. Didn’t even want to bother with it and now it’s my number 1.
If by “privileged” you mean higher step scores, better research, outstanding ECs, AOA membership.........then you’re using “privileged” wrong.
Bro this is just crazy. If you have 10 interviews at programs that are all matching top tier applicants then guess what? You're a top tier applicant! Programs like this aren't wasting their time interviewing people they are not seriously considering to match. Also you have no way of knowing how much selection bias is going on. It likely not that lots of low tier applicants are getting interviews and not matching. its more likely that high tier applicants are much more likely to rank a program based on prestige alone. Most average applicants or even competitive applicants from lower tier schools (MD and DO) are more likely to rank programs based on other things (ie location, vibe etc) bc they typically dont care about prestige as much. If you fall below 10 on your ranks its MUCH MUCH More likely that you're just a terrible interviewer or people dont like you as much as you think rather than you just have soo many top tier programs on your rank that are out of your league lol. I can tell you right now i'm a below average EM applicant and have been fortunate to get many invites includes some from top programs and i've never once looks at the schools of the residents or their pubs, scores etc. lol Thats so bizarre. If they interview you, then you have a chance and your perception of your own competitiveness shouldn't outweight true preference in your rank. Thats how you end up falling.
44 days until that Monday and 48 days until that Friday. I started since July 🥲
Look we all have the nerves, but the person who replied to you is probably right. You’re taking it up like 4 notches too far. What’s done is done, and whatever small field you may or may not be applying to isn’t THAT much different than the majority of other ones.
as much as I usually disagree with frenchyn's takes (sorry frenchyn) small fields like CT and derm people do go unmatched even with 12 interviews and having excellent people skills. 🤷♀️ Those ultra competitive fields do make the percentage who match in their top 3 go down. I know people at my school who matched at their last choice for more competitive fields and our school says to expect it as there are so many qualified candidates competing for a small # of seats.
Idk telling people they can’t possibly understand what he/she is going through because they aren’t in the same “tier” with “top interviews in a small field” just comes off pretty condescending to me. Happy for ya French but the “top” places of any other field aren’t THAT different.as much as I usually disagree with frenchyn's takes (sorry frenchyn) small fields like CT and derm people do go unmatched even with 12 interviews and having excellent people skills. 🤷♀️ Those ultra competitive fields do make the percentage who match in their top 3 go down. I know people at my school who matched at their last choice for more competitive fields and our school says to expect it as there are so many qualified candidates competing for a small # of seats.
this is an ERAS PANIC THREAD LET US PANIC
I don't agree with frenchyn's wording ever but lol i'm not going to lie when I'm not a CT or a derm candidate
I got interviews at t10/t20 places with my measly 23x score lmfaoooo but not even ranking them high cause i'm chasing my own happiness lol.
This sounds dumb. There’s PDs on this site that have said that “rank highly” means nothing and might even come off negatively. Sounds like a typical admin thinking they’re smart despite never going through any of this.
I would take all advice from admin with a grain of salt. Look at it like you looked at the FREIDA website data - 5-10 years out of date. Not useless, but not the end all be all and you definitely need to integrate your own judgement and research into the decision making process.
I think you could get the most accurate info from your PD lol you know like people who are in charge of this for a living. I'm asking my PD for advice and so far everything she's said has been very accurate!
Sorry, I don’t feel like it is worth for me to explain and further argue. Each of us have our own unique apps. Each specialty is different. Surgical subspecialty is more hierarchy than non. I did not want to further derail the thread and argue. If you have not noticed, we went down this path at least 3 times already trying to argue about cap this and cap that. Do you see we get anywhere? I know my goal, app and my field the best...just like you know yours. Don’t feel the need to explain mine. You can disagree w me. Idrc.
If this is true then why are you constantly responding to people posting generalizable, broad discussions points with "well, actually, in my super niche situation that is not true" ??? It's exhausting. We get it at this point. Your post is kinda ironic don't you think?
I do not care what or where you are applying to. Your situation isn’t THAT different than top tier places everywhere else. You can keep pumping up your self importance all you want it doesn’t change the fact we’re all in the same boat.
omg i'm just going to say right here CUT it out I didn't support the condescension lol no need to get spicy with other applicants
I don't think this is condescension as much as the language barrier, FWIW. @frenchyn hope the match works out in your favor, regardless of your field you should have good chances with the number of interviews you have. Your probability of failing to match is probably higher than most other fields, but your overall chances are still good.
There is always the language Nazi. Sorry I don’t proofread my post on an anonymous forum.
Hahaha. He was being empathetic and saying English being a second (third? fourth?) language was what was causing you to come off so contrarian and adversarial in every. single. post.
Done mentally or actually like completed and moving on?
completed, moving on lol. it's v painful taking a shelf after step 2 don't recommend
Definitely don't listen to this lmao
