A
AnatomyGrey12
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lolROL submission opens tomorrow [emoji50]
One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lolROL submission opens tomorrow [emoji50]
One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lol
I do not care what or where you are applying to. Your situation isn’t THAT different than top tier places everywhere else. You can keep pumping up your self importance all you want it doesn’t change the fact we’re all in the same boat.
but best of luck to you in your Uber unique and special pursuits. Worrying about it just makes you feel worse. Roll with whatever happens I promise you’ll feel better
I don't agree with frenchyn's wording ever but lol i'm not going to lie when I'm not a CT or a derm candidateI got interviews at t10/t20 places with my measly 23x score lmfaoooo but not even ranking them high cause i'm chasing my own happiness lol.
THIS IS AN ERAS PANIC THREAD I rather let people panic on here than you know simmer in the abyss
Which Halo? (Hint: there is a right answer and I am judging you on this response 😉 )One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lol
One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lol
Halo 3 is the OG Halo; sooooooo many memoriesWhich Halo? (Hint: there is a right answer and I am judging you on this response 😉 )
Ding ding ding * this was the correct answer (halo 1&2 would have been acceptable for the nostalgia, and halo wars would gotten partial points for unexpected yet respectable answer)Halo 3 is the OG Halo; sooooooo many memories
shotty snipes
Halo master chief? I’m down.One more day until I submit that list and get to go back to twiddling my thumbs and playing Halo lol
I think I would agree that Halo 3 is probably the best, but I have the best memories/spent the most time playing Halo 2. So much fun high school nostalgia with that game.Ding ding ding * this was the correct answer (halo 1&2 would have been acceptable for the nostalgia, and halo wars would gotten partial points for unexpected yet respectable answer)
some great memories playing shotty snipes/custom games/forge/campaign (last mission on legendary + all skulls on) w the boys all night
OG Halo 3 on my old 360 lol.Which Halo? (Hint: there is a right answer and I am judging you on this response 😉 )
OG Halo 3 on my old 360 lol.
I am worried too! Think positiveAm I the only one here worried about matching period? seems to me like everyone has plenty of interviews. May just be the SDN reporting bias
I mean, it's so monumental of course I'm worried about it. But intellectually I have a 99-100% chance of matching by interactive charting outcomes.Am I the only one here worried about matching period? seems to me like everyone has plenty of interviews. May just be the SDN reporting bias
Nothing other than you just won’t match into that program/track because they won’t be ranking you since they didn’t interview you.Also, just out of curiosity, what happens if I rank a program/track I did not interview at/for?
I've encountered some weird hybrid TY/advanced programs where I interviewed for the rads residency and then they sent me a match code for their PGY1 program and told me I should rank it and they'd count my rads interview as my interview for the TY too.Nothing other than you just won’t match into that program/track because they won’t be ranking you since they didn’t interview you.
Well yeah but that is kind of a niche scenario. I don't think that is similar to the scenario described by the poster above.I've encountered some weird hybrid TY/advanced programs where I interviewed for the rads residency and then they sent me a match code for their PGY1 program and told me I should rank it and they'd count my rads interview as my interview for the TY too.
So it's possible to match a PGY1 you never interviewed for, in theory even one you never actually applied to
Yeah definitely only applies for people with a prelim year. Funny to think I could match with a PD I've never spoken to and who I didn't even send my ERAS to lolWell yeah but that is kind of a niche scenario. I don't think that is similar to the scenario described by the poster above.
Edit: they also told you they were ranking you.
Some data came out for Urology match today.
Avg apps per person: Similar to last year (77 vs 74)
Avg interviews done per person: Similar to last year (12 vs 13)
Avg interview invitations per person: Down from last year (9 vs 13)
Match rate: Similar to last year (80% vs 83%)
Very interesting to see - it looks like maldistribution of interviews may have been a thing, but it didn't much impact the outcomes.
How is the average for interviews actually done higher than the average interview invites? Seems like you need an invite to do the interview...
Someone just matched Urology from my brand new DO school's inaugural class at a program that rarely/never accepts DOs.Some fun news, my DO school had a top 20 Ophtho match today.
I agree, it shouldn't be possible to have more total interviews attended than total invitations. I think it might be showing interviews attended for matched applicants, versus interview invitations for all applicants (matched or not). Here's the page if anyone else wants to try and figure it outHow is the average for interviews actually done higher than the average interview invites? Seems like you need an invite to do the interview...
If it’s the mean, then some people at the top end of the spectrum hoarding interviews will skew it up.
My brain doesn’t want to do math right now, so maybe you’re right, but seems like interview hoarding would lower both numbers, since others wouldn’t get invited OR attend interviews they didn’t get invited to. I’m thinking more like the invites number is including people with 0-low interview invites, who then didn’t attend any interviews and/or for some reason aren’t included in the interviews attended number (shifting the average up)
i meant with regards to people with <6 interviews...I mean, it's so monumental of course I'm worried about it. But intellectually I have a 99-100% chance of matching by interactive charting outcomes.
x = total invitations, y = total attended, n = total participantsI didn’t look at the data, just his summary. But if a small number of applicants got a disproportionately large number of invites AND kept them, it could still result in fewer average interviews and a larger number of average interviews attended. But I haven’t done the math to see what it would have to be to do that. Might be impossible.
x = total invitations, y = total attended, n = total participants
x must be greater than y
x/n must be greater than y/n
I think you’ll find IM residents/attendings to be your people once you start rotations.I didn’t say I don’t know how to do math. I am a mathematician. I said I didn’t do the math.
But the way mean works, it allows for small outliers to skew results. I’m sure you’re aware of that.
I think you’ll find IM residents/attendings to be your people once you start rotations.
I didn’t say I don’t know how to do math. I am a mathematician. I said I didn’t do the math.
But the way mean works, it allows for small outliers to skew results. I’m sure you’re aware of that.
Nah hes rads gang and doesnt know it yetI think you’ll find IM residents/attendings to be your people once you start rotations.
Nah hes rads gang and doesnt know it yet
I knew you were a math major I thought youd get a kick out of my terrible proof
Nah hes rads gang and doesnt know it yet
I knew you were a math major I thought youd get a kick out of my terrible proof
I feel you. I had a multi level quadruple check process for looking up, making a list of, typing up, and verifying my codes.Does anyone else find it ridiculous that we more or less have to manually create our rank lists in a separate system than that we first applied to? Like, I understand the difference between AAMC/ERAS and the NRMP Match, but c'mon. It's not only creating more work for the applicants, but more pragmatically, it introduces an unnecessary element of human error to the process. What if I get the code wrong, what if I accidentally apply to the wrong track, etc. etc.?
you could also just go to your eras page and the "programs applied to" tab and it will only show codes for the programs and tracks within those programs you applied to. Just copy and paste over from there.I feel you. I had a multi level quadruple check process for looking up, making a list of, typing up, and verifying my codes.
yes that was one of the steps.you could also just go to your eras page and the "programs applied to" tab and it will only show codes for the programs and tracks within those programs you applied to. Just copy and paste over from there.
you have to manually resend them.Does anyone know if new board exam scores are sent to ERAS automatically? Like, let's say you apply and send in Step/Level 1 + 2. Then later on (post/mid-interviews or whatever) you take the PE....will they automatically see your score or would you have to manually re-send it in?
Manually send it in. August is the best time if you're worried about a fail affecting your # of invitesDoes anyone know if new board exam scores are sent to ERAS automatically? Like, let's say you apply and send in Step/Level 1 + 2. Then later on (post/mid-interviews or whatever) you take the PE....will they automatically see your score or would you have to manually re-send it in?
Pro is if you have a bad score or fail after sending its not automatically re-sent.you have to manually resend them.
Student Doctor Network helps students navigate admissions, training, and career decisions. Student Doctor Network Review is the academic and editorial publication of SDN.