- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 186
[deleted]
Last edited:
Maybe I am too far removed from residency application as a PGY3. I don't remember there were too many things (except research and LORs) about residency application that could be changed.Yeah I think the key to being a successful reapplicant is having someone with knowledge of your application who is willing to be brutally honest with you.
Seems like these stories happen more and more often
They actually don't. The match rate is pretty steady for US MD and DO grads from year to year. Its just the social media amplifies the tough to hear about cases.
I think there is no shortage of threads where this perspective can be discussed. Let’s try to keep this thread focused on helping the OP.Hmm, seems that the match rate has dropped to 92.8% for US seniors. In the not so distant future premeds will need to accept the fact that there is an 8%+ chance they will be saddled with debt.
Yeah I think the key to being a successful reapplicant is having someone with knowledge of your application who is willing to be brutally honest with you.
Man, that's really brutal about the SLOE.Unfortunately, my home program doesn’t have an EM residency. I have an EM mentor at a program in the same city (also one I applied to) who has indicated to me that the SLOE was really the only potential flag. That being said, after getting ~22 interview invites this year I thought the letter might not be such a big deal after all.
I’m definitely planning to meet with my EM mentor and hopefully the PD at that institution for a brutally honest conversation. I guess I was searching for how programs view reapplicants and if it ever works out for them, assuming they correct/improve what’s necessary and come back strong?
I interview for a different field and I think for us, the letters (don’t use SLOEs obviously) matter a bit more for getting an invite. We all review apps for everyone we interview around the time we interview them (day or two before and during). But a lot has to do with the actual interview itself...friendliness, ‘would this be a person I want to work with?’, does their app jive with what they say, etc.Unfortunately, my home program doesn’t have an EM residency. I have an EM mentor at a program in the same city (also one I applied to) who has indicated to me that the SLOE was really the only potential flag. That being said, after getting ~22 interview invites this year I thought the letter might not be such a big deal after all.
I’m definitely planning to meet with my EM mentor and hopefully the PD at that institution for a brutally honest conversation. I guess I was searching for how programs view reapplicants and if it ever works out for them, assuming they correct/improve what’s necessary and come back strong?
Unfortunately, my home program doesn’t have an EM residency. I have an EM mentor at a program in the same city (also one I applied to) who has indicated to me that the SLOE was really the only potential flag. That being said, after getting ~22 interview invites this year I thought the letter might not be such a big deal after all.
I’m definitely planning to meet with my EM mentor and hopefully the PD at that institution for a brutally honest conversation. I guess I was searching for how programs view reapplicants and if it ever works out for them, assuming they correct/improve what’s necessary and come back strong?
I posted it in another recent thread on this forum, but I didn’t match Derm (ranked 15 programs) but scrambled into a Derm spot right before intern year started (So I get what it feels like...the worst). One of my co interns didn’t match and interviewed during intern year and matched that year into Derm (at a place other than our intern institution’s Derm program). Granted our intern year institution had a top Derm program, and she did an elective with them, but one can surely match 2nd time around.I’m definitely planning to meet with my EM mentor and hopefully the PD at that institution for a brutally honest conversation. I guess I was searching for how programs view reapplicants and if it ever works out for them, assuming they correct/improve what’s necessary and come back strong?