Could AI replace all administrators?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I dont see why it couldnt. You still need humans but not ones that you have pay moderate 6 figures
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Clearly you don’t understand hospital administration. I’ll bet you there are already vice presidents of AI integration out there.
Ok, I threw this out as tongue in cheek but it’s very much a real thing:

 
Current hospitals and systems I agree. But new systems that are significantly more efficient cheaper will come eventually and inevitably outcompete these top heavy ***** filled disasters that we currently call hospitals.
Edit who knew that any negative term is now profanity.
 
Current hospitals and systems I agree. But new systems that are significantly more efficient cheaper will come eventually and inevitably outcompete these top heavy ***** filled disasters that we currently call hospitals.
Edit who knew that any negative term is now profanity.
I saw that Jeff Bezos is funding a company that will acquire manufacturing companies and streamline them with AI. I'm sure there are healthcare PEs that are already selling this concept to investors to apply to hospitals.

I think the patient facing and public facing roles will need to remain but the layers and layers and admin who only face each other is an absolute joke. They can ALL be replaced with one simple chip.
 
So much of administrative bs is computer based.. that can all be eliminated essentially now.. workflows need to be optimized for agentic systems not human but this is coming and coming quickly…can’t wait.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Considering private practices are cutting employees after integrating AI, admin is likely on the chopping block. Can't be 100% determined though with hospital organizations. However, I believe AI will actually help independent private practices to reduce overhead costs, and compete or perform better than larger organizations.
 
Considering private practices are cutting employees after integrating AI, admin is likely on the chopping block. Can't be 100% determined though with hospital organizations. However, I believe AI will actually help independent private practices to reduce overhead costs, and compete or perform better than larger organizations.
It can but those that are trying to use it wholesale to replace all humans will be disappointed.
 
i guarantee you that the focus of AI (outside of a private physician owned practice) will focus almost exclusively initially on replacing MAs, techs, then providers, and finally after all is said and done, then administrators.
 
Clearly you don’t understand hospital administration. I’ll bet you there are already vice presidents of AI integration out there.
came here to say the same

They are going to spend a bunch of money on AI consultants and probably have a chief AI officer

Hospital administration is a little bit like the federal government. It never gets smaller, just gets more expensive and less effective
 
Chief AI Officer role is already a think at major health systems


1774404564816.png
 
Don’t they also need an assistant chief ai officer, director of ai integration and chief ai ethics theorist rn, Bsn, aspcn, gfurn, masters of bs. There’s way more opportunity to hire mentally challenged bottom of their class business graduates and waste even more money.
 
Slightly off topic, but for those of you they do procedures at a hosp and esp if hospital employed I would recommend trying to get on the Board of the hospital. That is where the action is. If you have a good board at your hospital, they will hold administration accountable and they usually want to hear from the medical staff. Naturally you have to choose your battles carefully but you can make a difference
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Slightly off topic, but for those of you they do procedures at a hosp and esp if hospital employed I would recommend trying to get on the Board of the hospital. That is where the action is. If you have a good board at your hospital, they will hold administration accountable and they usually want to hear from the medical staff. Naturally you have to choose your battles carefully but you can make a difference
It depends on the hospital ownership. I was chief of staff for 5.5 years at a for profit corporate owned hospital. Serving on the board allowed me to see the books and know when the ship was sinking but the board had no say in the running of the hospital. I did have great sway based on being COS to get things done.
 
I'm a proponent of AI, but I don't think it's actually replacing many humans yet.

The big layoffs we see are mostly companies doing their typical trick of jumping on any excuse to do layoffs. From an organizational standpoint, it's good to shed people and divisions periodically.

Human suffering aside, I hope we see the same in healthcare: organizations taking the excuse to rid themselves of bloated admin.
 
I'm a proponent of AI, but I don't think it's actually replacing many humans yet.

The big layoffs we see are mostly companies doing their typical trick of jumping on any excuse to do layoffs. From an organizational standpoint, it's good to shed people and divisions periodically.

Human suffering aside, I hope we see the same in healthcare: organizations taking the excuse to rid themselves of bloated admin.
the the admin is going to make a decision to eliminate their own jobs? no chance.

this means less help for the docs. less help for us. fewer billers to collect on claims, less office staff to obtain auths, schedulers turn into bots who will get everything wrong.
 
the the admin is going to make a decision to eliminate their own jobs? no chance.

this means less help for the docs. less help for us. fewer billers to collect on claims, less office staff to obtain auths, schedulers turn into bots who will get everything wrong.
The executives will gladly get rid of anyone they can as soon as AI is good enough to make financial sense. It's already happening to some extent in billing, for example.
 
1778029366536.png

1778029790095.png


The issue is the physicians likely are not driving the decisions to pick where the AI gets used. The C-suite will likely use it to improve physician/midlevel productivity or as an excuse to reduce staffing.
 
View attachment 418656
View attachment 418657

The issue is the physicians likely are not driving the decisions to pick where the AI gets used. The C-suite will likely use it to improve physician/midlevel productivity or as an excuse to reduce staffing.
HMO era is the big bump in the middle, and post-COVID collapse of small private practices and rise of private equity at the tail end?
 
Transitioning away from the bureaucratic humans to AI will be a grass roots movement that takes place in private practice, and filters its way to hospitals at the rate that mirrors the demonstrated operating margin improvements. The success of AI in PP depends on how well it plays with the AI at insurance companies. The AI at insurance companies will likely be influenced by hospital administrators, and the hospital lobby - and may thus be poisoned to specifically NOT play well with PP AI.

The #1 purpose of every hospital administrator is NOT improved patient outcomes. It is improved personal profit and job security outcomes. Everything else is secondary to this.
 
The #1 purpose of every hospital administrator is NOT improved patient outcomes. It is improved personal profit and job security outcomes. Everything else is secondary to this.
Fact check: TRUE

They do serve one other purpose: to relieve the accountability of their superiors and transfer it to their subordinates...