- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 1
my cousin wants to apply but is worried about his Class C Misdemeanor. i told him there should be nothing to worry about, its the same class as a traffic ticket! should he be concerned?
toofache32 said:"Your cousin"??? Hmmmm
what's an alcohol ticket? if it's something like an open container citation, who cares? if it's a DUI, i applaud any dental school that tosses his application in the trash.utahdentist2be said:he got an alcohol ticket... I think it sucks, considering it was just one stupid mistake they're making him suffer for.
Why punish him for something he has already been punished for? I don't think DUI is a felony.syn_apse said:what's an alcohol ticket? if it's something like an open container citation, who cares? if it's a DUI, i applaud any dental school that tosses his application in the trash.
I dont think a misdemeanor from years ago will really affect anything... A week after i turned 18 i got charged with "Theft under $250" because of a stupid idea to scalp tickets, well i got caught... i regret it and learned my lesson with a years probation! I really think it wont make much of a difference, but then again i just might be in denial... i dont knowTX2thDR said:my cousin wants to apply but is worried about his Class C Misdemeanor. i told him there should be nothing to worry about, its the same class as a traffic ticket! should he be concerned?
a first-time, non-injury DUI is almost always a misdemeanor. hurt somebody or do it more than once and it'll be a felony in most cases. regardless of the classification, a DUI shows a certain disregard for human life that will kill a pre-health application pretty quickly.colt said:Why punish him for something he has already been punished for? I don't think DUI is a felony.
Now im getting scared! I need to go to the court house and get one of those background checks ran for 30 bucks to see if this stupid offense i did when i was younger is still on there... if it is im definately getting a lawyer to get it off... great more money to spend!utahdentist2be said:For those wondering, an "alcohol ticket" is a citation given to anyone under the age of 21 who is found to have alcohol in their system, or in possession of alcohol. In Utah, we have a "Not a Drop" law, meaning that no one under 21 should register any amount on a breathalyzer. An alcohol ticket is still only a misdemeanor. I got one when I was 17, luckily, my record was purged when I was 18. Unfortunately for my friend, he was legally an adult when he was charged. I don't mean to concern anyone who has a blemish on their record, for all I know, his personal statement might have mentioned an uncontrollable fetish for barnyard animals. All I know, is we basically have identical stats, applied to the same schools, and I got seven interview offers, he only got two, and I was accepted and he wasn't. Once again, take that for what it's worth.
Because DUI is a serious crime which SHOULD be a felony in all states and it is in some already.colt said:Why punish him for something he has already been punished for? I don't think DUI is a felony.
JohnUNLV said:Because DUI is a serious crime which SHOULD be a felony in all states and it is in some already.
DUI is a major cause of traffic accidents and fatalities.
In Nevada, after your first DUI you get your license suspended/revoked for 1 year and spend 30 days in jail. All states should be this tough, or tougher on DUI.
If it only takes a couple of beers for someone to be legally drunk (0.8 in most western states) than that person is a lightweight and is probably drunk and cannot drive safely. It usually takes more than just 'a couple beers' for the majority of the population to be above the legal limit.Hardbody said:Felony? Are you serious? Except for the fact that you can get a DUI after only a few beers, good idea to go locking up half of the adult population. From what I hear, in Europe everybody that is suspected of driving drunk gets a field sobriety test and if you pass you are good to go, fail and you will be locked up. Imo this is the best way to determine if somone is a threat on the road.
Not everything is black and white, and I certainly wouldn't want somebody out driving after they have had 25 shots of SoCo but come on. I have friends that are law enforcement officers who drink and drive (well more than the legal limit) on a regular basis. My point being is that MANY people drink and drive after having a few, these same people USUALLY know when to stop drinking. If DUI meant bombed off of your a$$ I would agree with you and want it to be a felony myself, but not with the current standards.
JohnUNLV said:Because DUI is a serious crime which SHOULD be a felony in all states and it is in some already.
DUI is a major cause of traffic accidents and fatalities.
In Nevada, after your first DUI you get your license suspended/revoked for 1 year and spend 30 days in jail. All states should be this tough, or tougher on DUI.
Every state is different, I posted above that Nevada is 30 days in jail, (possible $1,000 fine) and licensed revoked for one year after the first offense. I'm not sure if the first one is a felony or not, but I know the 2nd one is. Some states its always a felony, others its never a felony.TeethVader said:DUI is also a misdemeanor isn't it?
.....and so it is therefore an OK thing to do? Great.Hardbody said:...I have friends that are law enforcement officers who drink and drive (well more than the legal limit) on a regular basis. My point being is that MANY people drink and drive after having a few....
What's wrong with that? I still got in dental school....utahdentist2be said:... for all I know, his personal statement might have mentioned an uncontrollable fetish for barnyard animals....
I agree, but the "SHOULD" part is your opinion. The states have their own ways of punishing someone for DUI. If someone was say 17 and got in trouble for DUI, but later went on to totally change their life around....should they be punished over and over for what they did at 17 when they're 23-25 applying to professional school?JohnUNLV said:Because DUI is a serious crime which SHOULD be a felony in all states and it is in some already.
DUI is a major cause of traffic accidents and fatalities.
In Nevada, after your first DUI you get your license suspended/revoked for 1 year and spend 30 days in jail. All states should be this tough, or tougher on DUI.
You make a great point. If you were very young, like 17, and its been 6 years since and have not committed any other crimes then yes i'd say they have grown up and realized how stupid it was.colt said:I agree, but the "SHOULD" part is your opinion. The states have their own ways of punishing someone for DUI. If someone was say 17 and got in trouble for DUI, but later went on to totally change their life around....should they be punished over and over for what they did at 17 when they're 23-25 applying to professional school?
Can people that drink and drive ever be rehibilitated?
Hardbody said:Felony? Are you serious? Except for the fact that you can get a DUI after only a few beers, good idea to go locking up half of the adult population. From what I hear, in Europe everybody that is suspected of driving drunk gets a field sobriety test and if you pass you are good to go, fail and you will be locked up. Imo this is the best way to determine if somone is a threat on the road.
Not everything is black and white, and I certainly wouldn't want somebody out driving after they have had 25 shots of SoCo but come on. I have friends that are law enforcement officers who drink and drive (well more than the legal limit) on a regular basis. My point being is that MANY people drink and drive after having a few, these same people USUALLY know when to stop drinking. If DUI meant bombed off of your a$$ I would agree with you and want it to be a felony myself, but not with the current standards.
I highly doubt this is true. This would be against pretty much every basic right and freedom we have in this country.tinman831 said:In Texas, police are now arresting people who are drunk in bars, BEFORE they even have a chance to drive. Never mind that they had planned on taking a taxi afterwards or having a friend take them home.
JohnUNLV said:I highly doubt this is true. This would be against pretty much every basic right and freedom we have in this country.
Now, if they were plastered and disorderly, well then they are breaking the law.
You can't arrest someone for what they "might" do.
tinman831 said:
Kudos Gulch for bringing up a great point. "just a couple of beers" are the famous last words for a lot of people who are not amongst us anymore. If you see the pictures of people who were in accidents because they were drunk driving or they were the victims of someone who just had a "couple of beers" (even if they were officers off duty), you wouldn't say the word "just" ever again.Gulch said:Seriously, I wish you were joking. I work for the coroner's office doing removals. You have no idea what a few beers can do. In fact, just a few days ago I picked up two teenagers who had a few beers, wrapped their car around a big cedar with the needle posted at 100. The car looked like at beer can wrapped around a closet pole with the front end thirty feet away. As for the boy and girl I picked up. Lets just say that I had to pick of the pieces of their bad decision. I'm pretty sure that the Death Certificate listed "Blunt force trauma" on the cause of death, but I would've liked to add "stupidity and a few beers." I'm just glad they only killed themselves and not any innocent persons. Seriously, they were MESSED up. It would make you think twice, in spite of your foolish officer friends.
IntlMed said:Kudos Gulch for bringing up a great point. "just a couple of beers" are the famous last words for a lot of people who are not amongst us anymore. If you see the pictures of people who were in accidents because they were drunk driving or they were the victims of someone who just had a "couple of beers" (even if they were officers off duty), you wouldn't say the word "just" ever again.
It is unfortunate that there is a huge amount of population that still beleives that they are in control of themselves even after a few drinks, and if such ignorance comes from someone who has studied the human body and understands how these chemicals affect our body, it is even more pathetic.
One more thing to note is that the SAME person can react differently to the SAME quantity of drinks, depending on the state of that person's body at that time. Like if you drink 2 beers after you just consumed 1 big pizza, it may not seem too bad, but try having "just a couple of beers" after starving the whole day at school. I bet you cannot drive with any amount of sanity.
Just my .04 cents of venting.
NOTE: Drinking is NOT COOL and DRUNK DRIVING IS A CRIME.
michaelazna said:No its not cool...but some of us do enjoy 2 drink...not 2 get drunk...no 2 impress anyone...just have a good time...y do people smoke, eat ice cream, have chocolate cravings? Same reason people enjoy a drink...and if i have 5 drinks someones going 2 come arrest me because they think im going to go out and kill someone...what if i have planned 2 take a taxi home...or as most people do have a designated driver! I htink i should have the freedom 2 enjoy a few drinks with some friends...y don't we just go into peoples homes and arrest them for smoking 2 much? or drinking 2 much coffee and accuse them of drinking 2 much caffeine...What kinda of country do we live in that we can't enjoy ourselves because of a few stupid irresponsible people...no offense but I would have a few choice words for someone who was going 2 arrest me on the count that they thought I was drunk...not mentioning the fact that they arrested those people WITHOUT giving them a test...breathelizer etc, walkin in a straight line..etc...ABSURDITY I TELL YOU LOL!
michaelazna said:No its not cool...but some of us do enjoy 2 drink...not 2 get drunk...no 2 impress anyone...just have a good time...y do people smoke, eat ice cream, have chocolate cravings? Same reason people enjoy a drink...and if i have 5 drinks someones going 2 come arrest me because they think im going to go out and kill someone...what if i have planned 2 take a taxi home...or as most people do have a designated driver! I htink i should have the freedom 2 enjoy a few drinks with some friends...y don't we just go into peoples homes and arrest them for smoking 2 much? or drinking 2 much coffee and accuse them of drinking 2 much caffeine...What kinda of country do we live in that we can't enjoy ourselves because of a few stupid irresponsible people...no offense but I would have a few choice words for someone who was going 2 arrest me on the count that they thought I was drunk...not mentioning the fact that they arrested those people WITHOUT giving them a test...breathelizer etc, walkin in a straight line..etc...ABSURDITY I TELL YOU LOL!
michaelazna said:No its not cool...but some of us do enjoy 2 drink...not 2 get drunk...no 2 impress anyone...just have a good time...y do people smoke, eat ice cream, have chocolate cravings? Same reason people enjoy a drink...and if i have 5 drinks someones going 2 come arrest me because they think im going to go out and kill someone...what if i have planned 2 take a taxi home...or as most people do have a designated driver! I htink i should have the freedom 2 enjoy a few drinks with some friends...y don't we just go into peoples homes and arrest them for smoking 2 much? or drinking 2 much coffee and accuse them of drinking 2 much caffeine...What kinda of country do we live in that we can't enjoy ourselves because of a few stupid irresponsible people...no offense but I would have a few choice words for someone who was going 2 arrest me on the count that they thought I was drunk...not mentioning the fact that they arrested those people WITHOUT giving them a test...breathelizer etc, walkin in a straight line..etc...ABSURDITY I TELL YOU LOL!
tinman831 said:
Well, techinically they are breaking the law. It's not like they arrested every person in the bar they arrested 30 from 36 sting operations (each of which i bet lasted for hours and hours), and those 30 were probably stupid drunk, falling all over themselves, yelling and screaming at people and would most likely end up driving.tinman831 said:
Through all your incoherence.. i have just two questions, how do you know they didnt get them a BAC test in the bar? And if it wasnt done in the bar, it is standard operating procedure to have a blood BAC test during booking at the jail.michaelazna said:No its not cool...but some of us do enjoy 2 drink...not 2 get drunk...no 2 impress anyone...just have a good time...y do people smoke, eat ice cream, have chocolate cravings? Same reason people enjoy a drink...and if i have 5 drinks someones going 2 come arrest me because they think im going to go out and kill someone...what if i have planned 2 take a taxi home...or as most people do have a designated driver! I htink i should have the freedom 2 enjoy a few drinks with some friends...y don't we just go into peoples homes and arrest them for smoking 2 much? or drinking 2 much coffee and accuse them of drinking 2 much caffeine...What kinda of country do we live in that we can't enjoy ourselves because of a few stupid irresponsible people...no offense but I would have a few choice words for someone who was going 2 arrest me on the count that they thought I was drunk...not mentioning the fact that they arrested those people WITHOUT giving them a test...breathelizer etc, walkin in a straight line..etc...ABSURDITY I TELL YOU LOL!
JohnUNLV said:Through all your incoherence.. i have just two questions, how do you know they didnt get them a BAC test in the bar? And if it wasnt done in the bar, it is standard operating procedure to have a blood BAC test during booking at the jail.
and #2, you can "what if" all day, the fact is that you're wrong, MOST people do NOT use designated drivers. Do you really believe that drinking coffee has the same effects on your body as alcohol?
Again, just because they didnt do a field sobriety test at the bar does not mean they that didnt do a blood test at the jail, I can tell you that they did because its the law.michaelazna said:The reason I know about the BAC is because the owner of hte Coyote Ugly was on the radio this morning and he said that. He said no tests were done at ALL and that almost all of the cases get thrown out if you fight it because they did NOTHING wrong...and yes they had witnesses who were designated drivers! So basically ur wrong...and maybe u don't have a designated driver but people have smartened up and actually do use them...I know i'm a designated driver every few times we go out...its not 2 hard if ur social...we don't always have 2 drink because we are in presence of alcohol...and a lot of people are using taxis now because its pretty cheap and no risk....
Thanks everyone for hte positive comments though
of course you should feel comfortable driving, one drink is well-below .08Yah-E said:Some of you need to get off your high horse and stop preaching. .. if I only had one beer or one glass of wine on a date, I feel absolutely comfortable driving!
I'm glad that I got caught, now I'm more aware of the consequences.syn_apse said:the only bad thing that happened was that you got caught.
I agree with you on this post. (your last one was rather hostile)Yah-E said:I'm glad that I got caught, now I'm more aware of the consequences.
I understand this and that is why I learn from my previous mistakes and am very conscious of my toxication status and driving. If I know it will be a crazy night, I simply don't drive. Attending a MAD session was not only an eye opening experience, but very effective (touching).
As long as one learns and modify their behaviors, then everyone should deserve a second chance, even a dental school applicant!
Hardbody said:I just got done with a barrage of tests (all of which I nailed) so sorry I couldn't reply back sooner. Way too many people have responded to my post to respond to each personally so all I can say is that either I did a poor job writing my post or you all did a poor job interpreting it so let me make myself clear. I AM TOTALLY AGAINST SOMEONE DRIVING A VEHICLE THAT IS SMASHED. I have never once drove a vehicle while intoxicated and I never will. That being said, the legal limits are BULL**** (this was the point of my first post). .08 is a joke, and I believe that a DUI can be given for as low as .04 (at least in NY). It takes me at least 1/5 liter of Jagermeister to even feel a buzz, althugh I weigh about 230lbs (I lift weights, so it's muscle and not fat). That has to be way over the .08 mark.
I think everyone can agree that knowing the laws, then drinking and driving is just plain stupid. I think it can also be agreed upon that anyone who is smashed should not get behind a wheel. I do feel that everyone deserves a SECOND chance and should not be crucified over an isolated incident when they were younger.