It actually sounded like she wanted to talk more about the interviews... and seems to think is was a good decision, but she had to leave at 7 on the dot.
As for the unique qualities statement, I think they do want you to talk about yourself... just to talk about something other than your amazing experiences working with vets or whatever. She said about 80% of applicants last year just said that they are qualified because they have such fabulous animal experience, so they didn't seem unique. Plus, they can already see you have experience from other parts of the application. Indeed, it is only 600 words, so you really can't be flowery, just a few sentences!
The start of the really sinking feeling about my lack of vet experience was related to a statement that the letters should come from logical people, depending on your circumstances. Then she threw out the example that an older non-trad applicant (I think that is me) should probably have a letter from their employer (I have that) and 2 from vets they have worked with. Ummm... yeah.... I don't have that. The sinking feeling continued when she said that most of her post rejection interviews came down to the fact that the applicant didn't have enough vet experience. My total hours in a veterinary setting are, gasp, don't laugh, less than 100 as of today. I have extensive basic science research and general animal experience, and spent more hours than I wish at the CSU VTH with my pet dog undergoing chemotherapy treatment, but when push comes to shove, I just don't have the hours with a vet to support my passion for a career change. I know I am applying just for the experience of applying and the post-rejection interview, but I had been clinging to the hope that maybe, just maybe, they would take a chance on me!
Oh, and I just remembered that you can "project" hours up until December... that will buy me about 80 hours...