Hey guys,
I just recently got done taking the 2009 ADA sample test and I'm not happy with my scores AT ALL. I understand that there were a bunch of mistakes with the test, but I corrected all the mistakes I could find through this forum. With the corrections accounted for, my scores were:
TS: (73/100) 18
BIO: (35/40) 21 (thought this wasn't too bad, I'm sure real DAT is much tougher eh?)
GC: (18/30) 16
OC: (20/30) 17
RC: (27/50) 17 (literally wanted to throw my laptop doing this section, very difficult I thought)
QR: (27/40)19
PAT: (80/90) 22
And what I calculated for the AA was an 18. I'm shooting for the 20-20+ range on the real thing, so I'm kinda freakin out right now.
I made VERY stupid mistakes for GC and OC, which I'm hoping I won't on test day.
Just wanted to see what you guys think and how it compares to the real thing.
Thanks in advance
I just recently got done taking the 2009 ADA sample test and I'm not happy with my scores AT ALL. I understand that there were a bunch of mistakes with the test, but I corrected all the mistakes I could find through this forum. With the corrections accounted for, my scores were:
TS: (73/100) 18
BIO: (35/40) 21 (thought this wasn't too bad, I'm sure real DAT is much tougher eh?)
GC: (18/30) 16
OC: (20/30) 17
RC: (27/50) 17 (literally wanted to throw my laptop doing this section, very difficult I thought)
QR: (27/40)19
PAT: (80/90) 22
And what I calculated for the AA was an 18. I'm shooting for the 20-20+ range on the real thing, so I'm kinda freakin out right now.
I made VERY stupid mistakes for GC and OC, which I'm hoping I won't on test day.
Just wanted to see what you guys think and how it compares to the real thing.
Thanks in advance