- Joined
- May 26, 2015
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 5
Thanks for visiting this page! I'm a '17 grad from Emory stuck between University of Chicago's Master of Public Policy (MPP) and Johns Hopkins' Master of Science in Public Health (MSPH) in Health Policy.
---
My long-term goal is to work with policymakers in the government to create more effective healthcare legislation. That's pretty broad, but my interests are particularly in the translation of scientific evidence to political decision-making and the effects of policy on socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable populations. As I see it, Hopkins' MSPH would help me in my long-term goals by granting:
It's a difficult decision because it seems like Hopkins fits better for my long-term goals, but Chicago fits better for my short-term goals, which include working in the private sector in healthcare consulting or a think tank/policy institute before transitioning into the government. I am leaning towards Chicago because of this and knowing I can still incorporate health policy classes/experiences into my education (health policy certificate, health policy classes, etc), although my health policy education obviously wouldn't be as explicit as Hopkins would. If you've gotten to here, thanks for your time in helping me decide on my future! You're great!!
edit: extended decision deadline is 4/27 b/c I got off Chicago's waitlist
TL;DR - By choosing to go to Chicago w/goal of pursuing a career in creating healthcare policy in the government, would I be limiting myself in any way by not going to Hopkins?
---
My long-term goal is to work with policymakers in the government to create more effective healthcare legislation. That's pretty broad, but my interests are particularly in the translation of scientific evidence to political decision-making and the effects of policy on socioeconomically diverse and vulnerable populations. As I see it, Hopkins' MSPH would help me in my long-term goals by granting:
- an education focused in health policy
- career outcomes more in line with my long-term goals: a professional network around the Hopkins/DC area and many grads going into the public sector
- a quicker (1-year) program and therefore ultimately cheaper ($80k vs. Chicago's $120k) route to enter the workforce
- more well-known in the Public Health arena
- a more flexible education focused in policymaking
- career outcomes more in line with my short-term goals: a professional network around the NE area and many grads into the private sector
- a better-paced (2-year) education, which will also give more time to build network/extracurriculars
- more well-known in the Policy arena
It's a difficult decision because it seems like Hopkins fits better for my long-term goals, but Chicago fits better for my short-term goals, which include working in the private sector in healthcare consulting or a think tank/policy institute before transitioning into the government. I am leaning towards Chicago because of this and knowing I can still incorporate health policy classes/experiences into my education (health policy certificate, health policy classes, etc), although my health policy education obviously wouldn't be as explicit as Hopkins would. If you've gotten to here, thanks for your time in helping me decide on my future! You're great!!

TL;DR - By choosing to go to Chicago w/goal of pursuing a career in creating healthcare policy in the government, would I be limiting myself in any way by not going to Hopkins?
Last edited: