dochubert

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Nov 13, 2002
85
0
48
Westfield, NJ
Status (Visible)
hey everyone...i've seen patients with several neuro folks at my school, as a consult, in clinic and private office setting, and it seems as though neurologists tend to spend more time with new patients vs other fields (understandably so). Have others found this to be true also? and perhaps more importantly, can a career in neuro allow you to afford to do this? i.e. is reimbursement is given for a longer new patient visit(i.e. vs, i dunno, derm), or reimbursement is high enough(vs, i dunno, medicine) that it allows you to see less patients in the same amount of time and still make 120-150k or whatever average is?
thanks so much for your help
 

Kalel

Membership Revoked
Removed
15+ Year Member
Feb 1, 2004
792
3
Metropolis
Status (Visible)
A neurologists' extensive physical exams do require them to spend more time with patients, and my understanding is that they usually don't get paid anymore to for their extensive neuro exams over say an endocrinologist who just touches the patient and orders a battery of labs for their new patient office visit. Volume=money in medicine these days. A radiologist told me that neurologists at my school were paid $35 to spend an hour with a patient in the ER whenver they are called, while a radiologist can spend 2 minutes reading a film for ~$15. Most neurologists still do alright for themselves though, probably because there seems to be a shortage of neurologists in many areas. I think that their avg income in most places is still 180-200K, above that of an avg internist.
 

IMGforNeuro

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Dec 11, 2003
153
1
Status (Visible)
from what i have seen neurologists not only see patients they also do some investigative procedures for which they receive payment.
These include EEG , EMG ,Nerve conduction studies etc. These procedures are done by neurologists themselves. Secondly most of followups of neurologic disease are done by neurologists , including stroke , epilepsy , parkinsons, alzheimers etc.
Neurologists with fellowships in stroke and who work in a stroke units are billed differently and i guess are paid more than a general neurologist( since they also remain on call for strokes and do intensive care).
Those with epilepsy fellowships would be doing other studies as video EEG monitoring and would be billed differently.
Like you said volume is money , there is a lot of neurologic disease. There are 700,000 new cases of stroke each year. Imagine emergency and intensive care management of 700,000 new cases every year and follow up of all previous cases with 700,000 new cases adding each year.
ER guys stabilize the patient and manage untill neuro takes over.
People are relatively less well informed of neuro subspecialities.
Stroke neurologists also do Transcranial dopplers or TCDs ( carotid dopplers are also done by cardio people) for which they also charge ( just like cardio guys do echo) . This is a relatively new trend , but is a must for all stroke units. Similarly almost all stroke fellows are trained in carotid doppler (which is extracranial doppler). In fact i was reading in a textbook that doppler studies are becoming a good tool for the stroke neurologist.
I spoke to some people regarding this. For example a stroke pt in intensive care develops recurrent ischemia do TCD find about ischemia and do needful. Pt with SAH dev weakness (vasospasm)or deterioration do TCD because it is a portable and more managable and gives quick insight into territory of ischemia or vasc damage. Vascular neurology fellowships are also getting board certifications now.
I know more about cerebrovasc dis because of my interest , but i am sure other neuro subspecialities also have cetain things.
This is apart from consults .
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 17 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.