- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 8,454
- Reaction score
- 39
now if you're in cali, like me, then you're screwed for is schools.
+ 1
now if you're in cali, like me, then you're screwed for is schools.
Just wanted to add something, in support of those who assert that most people don't even realize if they're being treated by a DO or MD...
I work for a state insurance regulator's office. I work in their consumer call center and talk to between 50-60 people per day and a good 50% of them do not even know the name of their own health insurance company. Sometimes people will even file complaints against a health plan that they don't even have...
Christ.
come on, man. what are you basing this on? admissions? there are a lot of US MD schools that are easier to get into than DO schools. if you're in-state in less competitive states (e.g. WV, AL, AZ, AR, CO, HI, KS, SC, KY, MS, etc.) then you have a damn good shot at getting in to IS schools. E.g. You got a 40% chance of geting into WVU if you're in state. (And 68% chance of getting an interview). if you're IS in AZ, you're guaranteed an interview. Let's be serious. In less competitive states, you got anywhere from 20-42% straight odds of getting in. that's VERY high.
now if you're in cali, like me, then you're screwed for IS schools.
I totally agree... I myself come from a state which is very hard for even IS to get into.... I feel very grateful I got in to med school, but at the same time, there are A LOT of qualified applicants that simply dont get in because of bad luck
I would personally wait a year or two (or maybe even three, but not sure) and keep applying allopathic... if I didnt get in by the third time I applied, then I would go DO... thats just me though
And essentially give up three years of your future physician salary. That's approximately 400K-500K, if you go into one of the lesser paying specialties.
400K-500K because you really wanted two SPECIFIC letters after your name isn't worth it to me, but to each his own.
Well you have to understand that the vast majority of DO students are so because they couldn't get into an MD. You would be in the minority having an MD acceptance. Patients know this and they generally want the best people possible in charge of their health care.
i don't know. i know its stupid, but i guess the initials after my name kind of matter to me. i'm the kind of person that really cares about what others think. i don't want future colleagues or, worse, future PATIENTS, like the one's born described, to think less of me.
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everyone.
HAHAHAHAHAH. Dude, 1. I can't argue with you if you're trolling and 2. people are so shockingly clueless about healthcare that saying the average plumber thinks 'there are two slightly separate but fully licensing paths to becoming a physician, that of the Allopathic or MD, and the Osteopathic or DO, and at this point in time, DO MCAT and GPA averages are lower than that of MD (very slightly in many cases), ergo, DOs represent a lower quality of physician,' makes me want to pee my pants laughing. In the last year, I've had people ask me what a residency was, if I get paid for going to medical school, if I pick a field like a major in college before I start medical school, etc etc ... the average person doesn't know what you are talking about. Ugh, OP please ignore his/her points.
I got accepted to both MD and DO schools and chose DO based on your exact reasons and I'm a resident now. Don't listen to what any of the pre-med kiddies here tell you. If you have any questions feel free to PM me.
Oh no, here comes Bacchus again with his infinite wisdom . If you are worried about what others will think you have inferiority issues that well go beyond your future career. Be rational; no doctor is going to run out of patients unless he or she is useless, vile, loathing, etc.
Money talks in America. People are going to say what they do for a variety of reasons. Show them your paycheck, as a DO, and they will shut up or show great envy of you. The people telling you this bull**** are those with inferiority complexes. Do not stoop to their level.
You are legally able to call yourself a physician. Why do you care what others think? Grow a pair and move on.
Common pre-med myth that never happens in reality. I had one patient ask about the initials two years ago when I was a 3rd year student. Nobody else has ever asked (out of hundreds to thousands).
The problem is pre-meds always want to be the best and most prestigious at whatever they do, which is probably why they all think they're going into radiology, dermatology, cardiology, or neurosurgery (note that most of you won't). Sick patients just want to get better. This is a difficult concept for you guys to grasp.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this forum is now dumber for having read to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuBHzJ5LrXE
SDN: the only place a resident's or medical student's advice is outranked by a pre-medical student.
Have you ever worked at a hospital before? Again, neither I, my colleagues, nor any of the preceptors and residents I've worked with have encountered this scenario you are talking about. Zero DO's that I've worked with have had to qualify or explain themselves at the hospitals I have rotated at. Patients just want to be taken care of and they don't give a crap about whether you are an MD or DO. I have no idea where this myth comes from. In the past, I have encountered a couple of people, in an area what wasn't very DO-heavy, who weren't familiar with it and were curious, but that was the extent of it.
Good luck with that. You do know that the Latin root for "doctor" means teacher, right? Part of the role implies educating patients. BTW, brace yourself, because there's nothing really easy about the path to becoming a physician.
And essentially give up three years of your future physician salary. That's approximately 400K-500K, if you go into one of the lesser paying specialties.
400K-500K because you really wanted two SPECIFIC letters after your name isn't worth it to me, but to each his own.
You're as blunt as they come. I've read your comments on race and AA in medicine--amusing, and very ballsy.
I'm a blunt man myself, and I'd have to agree that there is a stigma on DOs. No, it doesn't end in pre-med. Surgeons and p.c. physicians I've shadowed make it clear where MDs and DOs stand. Patients, or at least the more informed ones, know that there is a distinction (though not necessariy what), and prefer MDs over DOs by a considerable margin. The hospitals where I interned and work at employ only MDs it seems (could you really argue sheer numbers at 3 different hospitals? All the board directors are MDs as well...), though for primary care, I assume the ratios aren't so skewed.
I--personally--don't care what my future colleagues are. If being a DO makes you happy friend, by all means, be a DO. If their methodology/philosophy makes you happy, by all means, go to a DO school. If you want to go into primary care, then it shouldn't matter so much farther down the road.
Do what makes your heart happy.
But your colleagues and patients may (and probably will) judge you, but such is the human condition. We love to put ourselves and others on some arbitary racial, political, professional scale and put ourselves on a pedestal.
EDIT: I live in California, and these are just my personal anecdotes. It's well known, California culture (especially in SoCal) puts a heavy emphasis on prestige, reputation, and credentials ("c**k stuffing"), and it gets tiring. I'm sure other parts of the country may be more welcoming to DOs. The fellow who posted here did provide some residency/matching statistics, so I encourage you to look at that.
Does anyone listen to the reality...
This guy/gal has seen somewhere around 1000 patients and has only had 1 patient ask! 1!
thank god I don't plan on practicing in SoCal.
Southern Cal is one of those places, where I just think it would be easier to get a job as an MD as compared to being a DO..... that is just my opinion, and I have no facts to base it on.... but I think having the MD title is very important if trying to find a job in LA, OC, SD, or SF... not so much for places like Sacremento, and the smaller cities in Cali
You're as blunt as they come. I've read your comments on race and AA in medicine--amusing, and very ballsy.
I'm a blunt man myself, and I'd have to agree that there is a stigma on DOs. No, it doesn't end in pre-med. Surgeons and p.c. physicians I've shadowed make it clear where MDs and DOs stand. Patients, or at least the more informed ones, know that there is a distinction (though not necessariy what), and prefer MDs over DOs by a considerable margin. The hospitals where I interned and work at employ only MDs it seems (could you really argue sheer numbers at 3 different hospitals? All the board directors are MDs as well...), though for primary care, I assume the ratios aren't so skewed.
I--personally--don't care what my future colleagues are. If being a DO makes you happy friend, by all means, be a DO. If their methodology/philosophy makes you happy, by all means, go to a DO school. If you want to go into primary care, then it shouldn't matter so much farther down the road.
Do what makes your heart happy.
But your colleagues and patients may (and probably will) judge you, but such is the human condition. We love to put ourselves and others on some arbitary racial, political, professional scale and put ourselves on a pedestal.
EDIT: I live in California, and these are just my personal anecdotes. It's well known, California culture (especially in SoCal) puts a heavy emphasis on prestige, reputation, and credentials ("c**k stuffing"), and it gets tiring. I'm sure other parts of the country may be more welcoming to DOs. The fellow who posted here did provide some residency/matching statistics, so I encourage you to look at that.
is it just a matter of exposure then?
That's what sort of worries me about choosing DO over MD. But it doesn't make sense. Why do they prefer MDs over Dos? It obviously has nothing to do with treatment/diagnosis. so why the difference in 'respect'? it can't be about admissions either.
is it just a matter of exposure then?
that is just my opinion, and I have no facts to base it on....
-That some, albeit few, DO schools are for profit, it casts a negative shadow over the AOA accreditation process.
This is a common misconception that's touted amongst the premed crowd, and there are two basic arguments against going DO:
1) No one knows what a DO is.
2) People prefer MDs over DO's.
If you look at those two statements, you'll realize the inconsistency of them. Because if people don't know what a DO is, then how can they prefer MDs over them?
I don't get it. DO residents and people who ARE in the actual field people are speculating about have already said out of the thousands of patients they have seen, not even a few have questioned their credentials or doubted their abilities.
Yet people are disregarding this first hand experience from people IN THE FIELD and wondering why people prefer DO's vs MD's, and why patients don't want to be seen by DO's.
I just don't get it. Only on SDN.
Not taking sides, but the argument still holds. Are you not allowed to prefer something you know vs. something you don't?
If you don't know the existence of something, how can you prefer another thing over it?
"I don't know if there is another kind of coffee besides Columbian, but I prefer Columbian."
"I prefer Columbian coffee over any other coffee that I do not know the existence of."
I don't get it. DO residents and people who ARE in the actual field posters are speculating about have already said out of the thousands of patients they have seen, not even a few have questioned their credentials or doubted their abilities.
Yet people are disregarding this first hand experience from people IN THE FIELD and wondering why people prefer DO's vs MD's, and why patients don't want to be seen by DO's.
I just don't get it. Only on SDN.
Not taking sides, but the argument still holds. Are you not allowed to prefer something you know vs. something you don't?
I became pre-med last year and thought like everyone else, why? I looked and saw stats were lower so I just assumed DOs were worse.
I've been accepted to one MD school. It's OOS but i have close ties (my parents live there). I've also been accepted to 3 DO schools. One is in my resident state, the city where i've lived pretty much my entire life. I am planning to get married soon to my fiance and we really want to stay near our hometown. SO, do you guys think that I would regret it if I chose the nearer DO school over the MD school i got into (which, i forgot to mention, is on the east coast, whereas my hometown is on the West coast). Do you think there's still a "stigma" attached to being a DO in the medical community? You think it might affect me down the line when i apply to residencies?
any advice/help is greatly appreciated. if you need other info, just ask.
Out of curiosity, would most of the folks on this thread agree that going to DO school is preferable to a Caribbean MD school? If so, why?
The highlight for me is still a 2009 ACGME Rad Onc match into Kaiser Sunset from Western.
I would go DO over a caribbean MD school in a second.
The problem with this line of reasoning can be illustrated by the fact that said Rad Onc match was the only successful one in the entire country. Check the NRMP data here (bottom of page 5).
Is there a reason why we assume that everyone is interested in ROADs? I guess maybe I would consider holding out for an MD school if I cared at all about the ROAD specialties... except that I don't.
The problem with this line of reasoning can be illustrated by the fact that said Rad Onc match was the only successful one in the entire country. Check the NRMP data here (bottom of page 5).
How do you know there wasn't only 1 DO interested in Rad Onc?
I think the problem with these topics is that no one takes a position on the DO vs MD debate in a vacuum. People are always trying to justify the decisions that they've already made. Not surprisingly people who are going to a DO school defend the quality of the DO degree as being equivalent to an MD in every respect; which it is. While those attending an MD school will try to argue that a significant difference exists when one is a practicing physician, and that DO students will have to overcome a stigma when applying for residencies and other positions for the rest of their lives.
These are the essentially the facts,
-It is significantly easier to gain admission to a DO school, not necessarily because the quality of education is worse. The selectivity difference plays a large role in the minds of pre-meds, when it comes to deciding upon the "prestige" of DO school.
-That some, albeit few, DO schools are for profit, it casts a negative shadow over the AOA accreditation process.
-It will always be more difficult for a DO student to match into competitive allopathic residency programs.
-As the number of medical students increases faster than residency positions open up, it will become more difficult for DO students to match into allopathic residencies, though i would argue FMG will suffer more from this situation.
-It is exceedingly rare to find a DO in academic medicine, due to both stigma and as the number of MD/PHD's increases it will become more difficult for regular MD's to find positions.
Just for full disclosure, I have been accepted into an Allopathic medical school next year but i don't believe that the ability to figure out the direction of torque and magnetic field lines is necessarily a great barometer of potential as a clinician.
I don't think that's true, though. It's a blanket statement.