- Joined
- Jul 14, 2012
- Messages
- 108
- Reaction score
- 12
I can't believe people are taking this thread seriously!!
Sorry if I wasn't clear - I didn't mean to cite any one example or person's post. Just a general feeling I get from having been reading and following these threads for months. It wasn't supposed to be an attack - I just think the conversations are really helpful and it's important that negative aspects, as well as positive ones, are openly shared.If by OP you are referring to the person who started the thread in the Osteo forum...ok (but I saw more of a conversation taking place over there)
If by OP you are referring to the troll with 1 post that started this thread, then please explain what topic he introduced that is important....in this thread I observed an OP basically saying that students should go Caribbean because DO schools suck and then proceeded to advertise how great Carib schools are.
I can't speak about the person. It is frustrating to write a practice note because you know its not going to be used. It's even more frustrating if your residents don't review said notes to give you insight. That said, you still have to take the initiative to learn, because regardless of your rotations you will be expected to be a competent intern.So basically what you're saying is that: person in referenced thread did not take any initiative.
I feel the same. I know so little regarding rotations... Most students I have talked to just say "don't worry about that now. Just focus on the school and pre-clinical education."I know people say that if you put work into picking your rotations, you can get ward-based, good preceptors etc. However, I am having a hard time understanding how this works logistically. You find rotations you want (at hospitals your DO school may or may not be affiliated with) and aggressively contact that hospital until they agree? Sorry if this is a dumb question.
Maybe ill eat my words in the future, but the clinical curriculum of medical school is what I am most excited about. The idea of getting subpar experience just plan sucks.
...And why don't osteopathic schools have their own teaching hospitals instead of opening up more campuses.
Don't some DO schools have teaching hospitals? Especially the ones that have been around for >100 yrs and those that have osteopathic hospitals near them.
and why don't osteopathic schools have their own teaching hospitals instead of opening up more campuses.
Very few do. And the ones that do are almost all public.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
I thought you wanted to go on a cruise with me. But you're right, we'll be as close as you get.
How about we go to a Carib med school that is ON a cruise!
Sent from my Galaxy S2
Since this is the most recent MD v DO thread, I'd just like to point out why DO>MD.
Alphabetical order.
/thread.
Very few do. And the ones that do are almost all public.
A couple of the non state schools with teaching hospitals include TUNCOM KCOM and DMU.
Very few do. And the ones that do are almost all public.
A couple of the non state schools with teaching hospitals include TUNCOM KCOM and DMU.
Umm KCOM and DMU don't. I dont' know what TUNCOM is so I can't comment. KCOM is next to a hospital but it is a small community hospital and there aren't enough spots for all of the students to rotate there so their students are sent all over the place just like many other DO schools.
The take home message is that not all DO schools are the same, just as not all MD schools are the same. There are a few MD schools where their clinical educational experiences are also subpar. You have to look at the individual school and their curriculum as well as their clinical affiliation. You can't make broad generalization about DO schools, just as you can't about MD schools.
I would like for pre medical students to start asking schools about the clinical education. Just like match list and complex pass rate, letting schools know that you view clinical education and opportunities as important factors in picking a school will motivate the schools to increase their effort in increasing the quality of clinical experience. If no one ask, then there is less pressure to improve these affiliations and experiences.
and the state DO schools are the only ones that come remotely close to being able to compete with MD schools. The DO world would probably be in a better place today had there been more MSU's, UNT's, and UMDNJ's opened rather than X Y and Z freestanding/tiny liberal arts school COM.
Sorry, I fail to see why a state school automatically delivers higher-quality education than a private school. Please elaborate.
because of the superior clinical education when you have your own teaching hospital
Very few do. And the ones that do are almost all public.
A couple of the non state schools with teaching hospitals include TUNCOM KCOM and DMU.
Ah; gotcha.
I wasn't aware that TUNCOM had an affiliated teaching hospital for its students... and I'm going there in the Fall. Which hospital is it?
A couple of the non state schools with teaching hospitals include TUNCOM KCOM and DMU.
Sorry, I fail to see why a state school automatically delivers higher-quality education than a private school. Please elaborate.
Forgive me for being skeptical about the .gov having the best interests of medical students at heart, especially after what happened to UMDNJ-SOM (soon to be RowanSOM) this past year.State DO schools have a public mission to fulfill, so they get a lot of support from the medical establishment when it comes to training and making sure everyone is qualified and clinically on par with their MD counterparts.
This makes more sense. But this one sounds like it really boils down to convenience then.Their rotation sites are typically fixed and their students seldom have to travel.
State DO schools have a public mission to fulfill, so they get a lot of support from the medical establishment when it comes to training and making sure everyone is qualified and clinically on par with their MD counterparts. Their rotation sites are typically fixed and their students seldom have to travel.
Umm KCOM and DMU don't. I dont' know what TUNCOM is so I can't comment. KCOM is next to a hospital but it is a small community hospital and there aren't enough spots for all of the students to rotate there so their students are sent all over the place just like many other DO schools.
TUNCOM is Touro University in Nevada.
No they don't.
Maybe we have different definitions of affiliated hospitals. Are we talking about hospitals that they are associated with (I use the terms affiliated and associated interchangably) or are you talking about hospitals that have the university's name?
When I said those schools did have affiliated hospitals I meant hospitals that are local to the campus that have established rotation sites for the school.
Edit: After rereading I realize my mistake. I read too quickly and inserted associated hospitals for teaching hospitals. There is a big difference. I apologize, MedPR and felix are right. There are no "Teaching Hospitals" at those three locations.
They do, however, have good reputable hospitals that they are associated with where a lot of your clinical education occurs and residency positions are available.
Sorry, I fail to see why a state school automatically delivers higher-quality education than a private school. Please elaborate.
The big state DO schools have an inherent advantage, and I believe they play a role in protecting the DO degree in the eye of the public and looking after their graduates. They share the same ecosystem within the state with the other state universities, including access to some resources. Faculty and staff are government employees and supported by an entrenched bureaucracy, politicians and alumni throughout the state. They can self-perpetuate and influence policy in the same way as the state MD schools.
Yeah that sounds pretty hokey.The big state DO schools have an inherent advantage, and I believe they play a role in protecting the DO degree in the eye of the public and looking after their graduates. They share the same ecosystem within the state with the other state universities, including access to some resources. Faculty and staff are government employees and supported by an entrenched bureaucracy, politicians and alumni throughout the state. They can self-perpetuate and influence policy in the same way as the state MD schools.
TUNCOM is Touro University in Nevada.
Maybe we have different definitions of affiliated hospitals. Are we talking about hospitals that they are associated with (I use the terms affiliated and associated interchangably) or are you talking about hospitals that have the university's name?
When I said those schools did have affiliated hospitals I meant hospitals that are local to the campus that have established rotation sites for the school.
Edit: After rereading I realize my mistake. I read too quickly and inserted associated hospitals for teaching hospitals. There is a big difference. I apologize, MedPR and felix are right. There are no "Teaching Hospitals" at those three locations.
They do, however, have good reputable hospitals that they are associated with where a lot of your clinical education occurs and residency positions are available.
By your definition, all schools have affiliate hospitals.
Not all MD academic hospitals share the same name as the school. WashU and Barnes Jewish, for example.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Actually this is Caribbean MD vs DO.
Therefore, alphabetically,
Caribbean MD>DO
Actually this is Caribbean MD vs DO.
Therefore, alphabetically,
Caribbean MD>DO
American DO > Caribbean MD
Thanks, Obama.
I'm curious. What qualifies as a university hospital in this conversation? That the hospital calls itself such and states your school is the university it refers to? What if it claims affiliation with more than one school formally? Does it have to be geographically within a small proximity of the school? Does the school need to be literally inside of it/on its campus? Does it have to be able to accommodate every student? Most students? Some students?
This conversation needs definitions before we keep making specious arguments about the presence or lack of teaching hospitals. Perhaps a debate of the relevance of certain definitions that are too strict or too lenient is required too.
American DO > Caribbean MD
Technically the Caribbean schools are in America... just not the United States of America.
Technically we are all in China
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Technically we are all in China
Sent from my SGH-T999 using SDN Mobile
Technically the Caribbean schools are in America... just not the United States of America.
You must not be from the US.
Only... THE REST OF THE WORLD uses "America" as the primordial definition.
Then again, I said "American" and that usage is almost entirely : United States citizen. (With the exception of a few 20th century latinamerican writers)
Or so my dictionary seems to think so
I would like for pre medical students to start asking schools about the clinical education. Just like match list and complex pass rate, letting schools know that you view clinical education and opportunities as important factors in picking a school will motivate the schools to increase their effort in increasing the quality of clinical experience. If no one ask, then there is less pressure to improve these affiliations and experiences.
This is a great point. Pre-clinical education is pretty standard and is definitely about what you yourself put into it. While you need to push yourself during clinical years as well there are some rotations where you won't even be given that opportunity. Clinical rotations are where you begin to learn how to function like an actual doc, they are imperative to succeeding on audition rotations and in turn getting a residency spot. The quality of rotations offered should be considered heavily when considering which school to attend regardless of MD or DO.
Survivor DO
As someone who just went through the application process, this sounds good but is more difficult than one might expect. Even at respectable and well-established schools like CCOM, rotations are not completely set in stone and sites and preceptors can vary from year to year and even within a class. It's thus difficult to use rotation quality as a major factor in making a decision about which school to attend.
As someone who just went through the application process, this sounds good but is more difficult than one might expect. Even at respectable and well-established schools like CCOM, rotations are not completely set in stone and sites and preceptors can vary from year to year and even within a class. It's thus difficult to use rotation quality as a major factor in making a decision about which school to attend.
One of our best local sites (Lankenau) from what I last heard, does not let you modify the chart, meaning you do not document your encounters unless you write them down and toss them at the end of the day.
This is hospital policy, not school policy.
I did 2 rotations at Lehigh Valley (Arguably one of the best hospital systems outside Pittsburgh and Philadelphia) which did the same thing. We were not allowed to modify the chart and thus our outpatient notes were not used.
Haha. I'm not training at Lehigh next year so say what you want.I know this is really late but...
Students only aren't allowed to modify the electronic chart. Surgery and OB still use entirely paper charts so the student H&Ps and notes are part of the chart. Also the EMR allows residents to be logged in multiple computers at once so I did a lot of documenting that way and the resident would just read over everything before they signed it.
But still frustrating. EMRs can be made to include students as I've rotated at plenty of places that provided for student note writing and ordering.
Geisinger and Hershey would both argue very loudly with you about Lehigh Valley