mrcoolio01 said:
If you have a DO degree and get an MD (allopathic) board (
http://www.osteopathic.org/index.cfm?PageID=faq_cons#certallopathic,
http://www.abms.org/)
does this mean you will have the MD title as well?
e.g.
John Smith, DO, MD
No. For example, I know someone who is board certified in PM&R (an allopathic specialty), but he's a DO. DOs can do allo specialties (and most do) and get board certified, but they retain their DO degree.
mrcoolio01 said:
I have seen some people do this like this guy
http://www.twbookmark.com/authors/65/1847/
(i don't know, maybe he paid $65 in California in the 60's to get the MD)
Who knows. Also, NYCOM has a program specifically for foreign MDs who want to earn DO degrees. Needless to say, all of these grads have both the MD and DO degrees. And of course, AT Still himself was both an MD and the founder of osteopathic medicine.
mrcoolio01 said:
No matter how much you tell me about how DO's are the same as MD's, I will always still want the MD title. So please don't try to convince me otherwise. I want to know if I can get the MD title in addition to DO, because I will be be specializing just like an MD. And frankly, most of the patients I will see won't really know what a DO is.
Yeah I hear this "most of the patients I see won't know what a DO is" argument, but why does it matter? They're gonna know you're a physician. And most patients don't give a rats ass as long as they're getting proper medical treatment. 90% of the public doesn't know what a DO is, but so what? If they don't know and ask, give them a simple explanation.
Consider likely scenarios...
In an emergency situation, the last thing on the patient's mind is the degree of the physician. If an old man comes in to the ER and complains of severe chest pain, he doesn't think to himself, "Boy, I sure hope I get an MD to treat me!" He's thinking, "Oh my gosh I think I'm having a heart attack! I need medical help immediately!"
And if a primary care physician refers a patient to a cardiologist/surgeon/anesthesiologist, the patient knows he/she is going to see a cardiologist/surgeon/anesthesiologist. Again, they know they're seeing a physician. If the primary care physician says, "I think you should see this cardiologist. Dr. Smith is the best in the area." Does the patient care if the doc is a DO or an MD? No. The patient wants the physician that can provide the best treatment.
The way I see it premeds and osteopathic students are way too worried about this issue. The only time it will probably make a difference is if someone is looking through a phone book. And really, this will have very little (if any) effect on the volume of patients you get.
So I take it you're at a DO school now? If you want the MD you're gonna have to enroll in an allopathic program. You could attempt a transfer into a US allo school (not likely) or perhaps some of the foreign medical schools (I know Ross takes transfers with advanced standing). But with all that extra time and money, I couldn't imagine why you would want the MD that bad. And US osteo schools match better than Caribbean schools 99+ % of the time when it comes to
residencies. Keep that in mind.
mrcoolio01 said:
If a DO is really as good as an MD, then why can't we have equivalent titles?
BTW - I already know about the carribean program (
http://www.uhsa.ag/pstudent/four/resdt/) but think it's a bad idea.
DOs FOUGHT to be recognized as separate (unique) but equal. Why would they want the MD title? You mentioned the California issue--look more into the history of that. I think you'll have a greater understanding and appreciation for osteopathic medicine.
The link you mention here (I've heard about it too), like you say, is a bad idea.
All that said, I would prefer to go the MD route for several reasons even though I will probably apply to a few DO schools when the time comes. But I think you're painting a very unfair portrait of osteopathic medicine and not giving the respect it warrants.