- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 1,178
- Reaction score
- 8
No one's saying it is. However, if you're holding out for science to try to prove the existence of God, you're wasting your time, as science has no business in doing such.
agreed.
No one's saying it is. However, if you're holding out for science to try to prove the existence of God, you're wasting your time, as science has no business in doing such.
IDK man.. up until some time ago.. i used to debate with my friends saying unguided evolution is the answer...
then suddenly.. one day.. something ticked, and that doesn't make sense... maybe that has something to do with me completely falling in love with my gf, lol... I never believed in any God before that.. now I'm starting to think there might be somebody "up" there...
maybe, too much of my friends is rubbing off on me.. idk..
maybe, so many species vanish so often is because the "One" is trying to organize his experiment, or cleaning up his room.. lol...
i dont know man... i do think evolution is the reason for speciation / extinction.. but I don't think it can be ABSOLUTELY unguided.... no one can know for sure - unfortunately
it is supreme human arrogance (and yet another fallacy of "intelligent design") that the human form is the crown jewel of biological design.just a quick question..
to the people who don't think "the human" is perfect, are you guyz the "glass is half empty" type? or do you not have any artistic/ appreciative bone in your body where u constantly have to point out things that are wrong?
just a quick question..
to the people who don't think "the human" is perfect, are you guyz the "glass is half empty" type? or do you not have any artistic/ appreciative bone in your body where u constantly have to point out things that are wrong?
just a quick question..
to the people who don't think "the human" is perfect, are you guyz the "glass is half empty" type? or do you not have any artistic/ appreciative bone in your body where u constantly have to point out things that are wrong?
This is funny because there have been many times in human history where we could not see something. Physicists still work on things that can't completely understand nor see.
Define soul, let wikipedia do it. Everyone has an idea:
It is funny you say that belief of a soul is lazy. Albert Eienstien was likely more intelligent that you and he believed in a soul and a God. Is he now a lazy idiot or something?
I definitely appreciate what you're saying here and I can definitely relate to your reasons.
I just wanted to say that the position you hold is entirely legitimate and reasonable. Educated people can disagree and debate on this.
The position you hold is the position of the catholic church, for example. They, along with other religions, act like grown-ups and accept that evolution is not something you may or may not believe in. They take it and make it compatible with their religion and so forth.
In other words, they take this discovery and say: "See! See how great god is to have used evolution to result in our current circumstance?!"
As opposed to, "The dinosaur bones were placed there to test our faith." Or, "What dinosaur bones?" Or, "What evolution?"
so... cheers!
it is supreme human arrogance (and yet another fallacy of "intelligent design") that the human form is the crown jewel of biological design.
Einstein never ignored science for the sake of holding unscientific beliefs.
Why must you only appreciate things for their "perfection"; can you not see artistic beauty in the imperfections of nature? Imperfections make one realize how beautiful life is considering how vulnerable life is to nature's forces.
yeah, lol
the church is notorious for using recent findings to its advantage...
but, when people used to believe in God blindly... if they thought god was smart enough to actually "create" them.. then if he exists, he certainly must be smart enough to come up with evolution..
and in that case, not to offend the ladies, god can be he or she...
He is not. It is just English. According to religion, God does not belong to any gender.How about neither? Why should God be subjected to the human definitions of gender?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perfectWe're the type that understand the definition of 'perfect' unlike yourself.
oh, if u read my previous posts, i wasnt saying only humnas are perfect.. i said all organisms are perfect.
How about neither? Why should God be subjected to the human definitions of gender?
No, they aren't; if they were, they would be invulnerable to any and all environmental obstacles. Now, if the world somehow snapped itself into a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, you might have an argument.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=8795439&postcount=364No, they aren't; if they were, they would be invulnerable to any and all environmental obstacles. Now, if the world somehow snapped itself into a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, you might have an argument.
lol, niceI understand god as energy.(E)
He has always been constant. He Was not created or destroyed.
Mass came from Energy...
so, ideally most males develop prostate cancer? Ideally, we have appendix(es?) that burst and kill us? Ideally, childbirth is a deadly proposition to the female body? Ideally, we have our optic nerve placed over our retina?
etc.
so, ideally most males develop prostate cancer? Ideally, we have appendix(es?) that burst and kill us? Ideally, childbirth is a deadly proposition to the female body? Ideally, we have our optic nerve placed over our retina?
etc.
👍lol. compared to what? What if childbirth killed a woman 100% of the time? What if our appendix just automatically killed everyone at 5 years old.
You are comparing "human" to your perfect idea of "human". Everything could be much worse. Both sides have a point here.
yes, do you want the earth population to grow to 10 billion?
lol. compared to what? What if childbirth killed a woman 100% of the time? What if our appendix just automatically killed everyone at 5 years old.
You are comparing "human" to your perfect idea of "human". Everything could be much worse. Both sides have a point here.
lol. compared to what? What if childbirth killed a woman 100% of the time? What if our appendix just automatically killed everyone at 5 years old.
You are comparing "human" to your perfect idea of "human". Everything could be much worse. Both sides have a point here.
If God created us in God's image, what and where is this image? And why is this image better or different than any person's image of a perfect human?
If God created us in God's image, what and where is this image? And why is this image better or different than any person's image of a perfect human?
The soul, in many religions, spiritual traditions, and philosophies, is the spiritual and eternal part of a living being, commonly held to be separable in existence from the body; distinct from the physical part.
How does this support the claim that we're perfectly designed?
Your argument that since 'things could be much worse' we're perfectly designed is fallacious.
How does this support the claim that we're perfectly designed?
Your argument that since 'things could be much worse' we're perfectly designed is fallacious.
I didn't say we were perfect, I just am saying we are what we are.
yes, do you want the earth population to grow to 10 billion?
This would imply that God was African American btw!!
![]()
I was arguing against vickpick's assertion that humans and all organisms are perfect.
I told him to look up the defn. and he did. And he stuck with it.
I worry about the universities you guys are going to..
I think he means that by 'perfect' we are designed to live just as long as will keep the population in check...or rather from growing wildly out of control too quickly...a perfect human in terms of being invulnerable would over populate while a human that was too fragile would lead to extinction
also I think it's about time for a Giants comeback!
The Earth's population will almost certainly reach 10 billion, regardless of what any of us says on this forum.
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17605186/
The Earth's population will almost certainly reach 10 billion, regardless of what any of us says on this forum.
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17605186/
If God created us in God's image, what and where is this image? And why is this image better or different than any person's image of a perfect human?
I think he means that by 'perfect' we are designed to live just as long as will keep the population in check...or rather from growing wildly out of control too quickly...a perfect human in terms of being invulnerable would over populate while a human that was too fragile would lead to extinction
also I think it's about time for a Giants comeback!
By that definition, modern medicine is the antithesis of human perfection.
Maybe life is supposed to be how it is.
Maybe medicine is supposed to do what it does.
Maybe people are meant to do what they do.
Kind've simple actually. God is a trinity, Father, Spirit, Son. We as humans are Mind, Body, and Spirit. That is what that verse is referring to.
You're right in saying a perfect human in terms of being invulnerable would be bad. Way to argue against a position I don't necessarily hold. 👍
Maybe life is supposed to be how it is.
Maybe medicine is supposed to do what it does.
Maybe people are meant to do what they do.
Saying things like that to everyone doesn't strengthen your arguing abilities...