- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 9,746
- Reaction score
- 1,670
hello pot, i'm kettle..Nice attitude.
hello pot, i'm kettle..Nice attitude.
plus minus system is bull****, if I have a 92% and the kid beside me has a 93%, he isn't smarter than me yet he's transcript A and mine will have an -A.....10 point scale is much more relevant IMHO.
But that's like saying, on a 10 point scale, that the guy beside you with a 89%, and you, with the 90% don't have any difference. No, there's a difference and that's where the professor/your school decide the difference would be.
Over 100+ credits, it'll wash out. i promise.plus minus system is bull****, if I have a 92% and the kid beside me has a 93%, he isn't smarter than me yet he's transcript A and mine will have an -A.....10 point scale is much more relevant IMHO.
my point is that getting a 90 is pretty difficult in most classes, but anywhere between a 90-93 is -A....and that is just stupid IMO.
i'm sure you're just a bundle of delightful wit in real life thoughHa no, I'm not that neurotic. I relate with him in a lot of ways though, so I'm sure my attitude has some similarities. Sorry my wit doesn't come across in text form 🙁
Come out to Vegas I'll buy you a drink.
aren't they free in vegas as long as you gambleCome out to Vegas I'll buy you a drink.
And my point is that it's the professor/departments choice. So why worry about it? Do the best you can and that's all. It probably won't affect your med school chances.
When you take it out of context like that I can understand why you might think that.
And what does UNLV have to do with anything?
Don't misquote me. That's not at all what I said.
What I actually said was an observation, not an insult. Some people have difficulty understanding abstract ideas, hence the concrete example. I'm sorry if you misunderstood me, but it seems some people have just been conditioned to view every comment on SDN in a negative light.
Have you decided not to follow up on your UNLV remark? Should I think less of myself for going to that school? Or did I just misunderstand what you were insinuating?
aren't they free in vegas as long as you gamble
and seriously, FREE DRINKS IF YOU GAMBLE????
Man, do some of you hear how pathetic you sound?
"Boo hoo hoo, I got an A- instead of an A. Boo hoo hoo, I got a B- instead of a B."
Is 0.3 points in an undergrad class going to make a big friggin difference in the long run? Do you think med school adcoms are going to say "Let's reject John Gunner because he got a B MINUS instead of a B in introduction to crybabying. He would be a terrible physician."
Give me a break.
Of course, just remember that you pay for the drinks in the money you lose, haha.
p.s. It's incredible what these threads turn into after awhile.
Well done. The key is asking a question that is even 0.2% controversial and you can be sure people from both sides will go at it. Usually ends in personal attacks 🙂 I like to kiss and make up afterwards 😍
What the title says. I understand plus grades, obviously, because you're better than a B but not an A, but SERIOUSLY? MINUS grades? that's the teacher saying, you know, you did pretty well, but......it just wasn't well enough to NOT ruin your gpa.
🙁
sorry for ranting, it's just wtf B-'s ruin everything and all the teachers know it, yet they still insist on putting them on the syllabus and therefore giving them out.
I understand the +/- system, but I seriously don't understand why the A+ doesn't count for anything extra like a B+ does. Why can't the A+ at least cancel out a "-" on you record or something at least? I worked my butt off for the A+'s that I got...
I think something like this (or having an A+ count for 4.3) is the only thing that makes sense since an A- counts as less than 4.0...
right, this makes sense. i think schools who use it currently are just giving you the "extra satisfaction" of seeing the a+ on your transcript...which is baloney.
i know! what was the point of working my butt off for the A+? Why is this hard work not rewarded?
Does anyone know the reason why these schools with +/- systems choose not to count an A+ as a 4.3? I'm curious to know their reasoning...
Currently contesting a course in which I received an A-.
I had a 93.5%.
This is bull.
No its not..AMCAS counts an A+ as an A anyways.That is an excellent idea. Makes way more sense than the 4.0 limit. I wonder why more schools don't do that.
quote
In reality, the OP laid out the grade points for the respective grades at her school.
I'm also trying to cheer up the lil scamp, but thanks for your invalid nit-picking.
True story:
I'm not a douchebag .
Are you sure about that?
false.
Oops, fixed it. Point is still valid though.
not really.. .3 vs .4 is only if you round. in reality the distances are all 1/3 of a gpa point, or .3333
In reality, the OP laid out the grade points for the respective grades at her school.
I'm also trying to cheer up the lil scamp, but thanks for your invalid nit-picking.
which is just the rounded version of the AMCAS standard.
why are we even arguing about this?
I dunno, let's be friends.![]()
word.
True story:
In undergrad, I took a pharmacology class and walked into the final with a high A. I studied hard and knew my crap, and I needed an 80ish to keep my A and a 70ish to get an A-. In the middle of the final, I needed to go to the bathroom really really really badly.
I went up to the prof and quickly explained my situation but before I could let him answer, I ran out the door and had explosive poo in the bathroom. Took 20 minutes out of my 2 hour final.
I ran out of time and got a 75% on my final and got an A- in the class. I was pissed off for about 30 seconds until I remembered that I'm not a douchebag who complains about getting a friggin A-.
Still trolling and making remarks on topics you contribute nothing to? Only on SDN...
Please dont take offense to that..but...HAHAHAHAH
OP,
I agree that +/- grading systems shouldn't be used, but I think straight A, B, C, D, F is going in the wrong direction in terms of fairness and accuracy. I've always thought that GPA is needlessly inaccurate in some cases and, instead of having GPAs, students should receive flat percentage grades. For example... If you took five three-credit classes and got 88, 91, 95, 79, and 86, then your cumulative percentage would be 87.8 instead of getting a B+, A-, A, C+, and B, which would be a 3.34. This removes any uncertainty of performance (e.g an 89 'B' vs. a 90 'A')
This probably won't ever happen, but I don't understand *why* people wouldn't want their grading system to be as fair as possible.
It's funny that you use that example because an 87.8 and a 3.34 are both solid "B+" averages. So your example shows that both schemes gives you the same information.