Donation to med school

Started by MDPedigree
Tags Tags
donation
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I wouldn’t do it. It almost feels like bribing to me. I think it can only hurt you. I can almost guarantee 99.9% of accepted applicants get in without donating money.
 
Too little, too late and too calculated.

You'd need to increase that with one or two more zeros and make the donation a year* before submitting your secondary application for it to register with the school that you are connected to that donation.

*correction: make that seven years before submitting your secondary.
 
Last edited:
Too little, too late and too calculated.

You'd need to increase that with one or two more zeros and make the donation a year before submitting your secondary application for it to register with the school that you are connected to that donation.

So if one were to donate say 300-500k to an Ivy League med school one year prior to submitting their secondary, and their stats are above the 10th percentile for the school and assuming they can interview decently would that get them accepted or just a "Curtesy interview followed by a rejection" ?


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is your family name so recognizable that the school might reasonably expect a 'gratitude donation' in the future?

Either way - please don't do it now. After you graduate, it would be most appreciated. Before you're admitted, it's just squicky.
 
Thanks everyone! I was not actually considering this lol, but I was just curious as to how the donation game works. I, and certainly 99.9% of applying applicants, definitely don't have this kind of money just laying around.
 
If this were discovered in an audit 4 years later, Mr Smith would owe about a half-million dollars to IRS.

If you are independent it's generally 3 years you're clear. For businesses I believe it's anything past 7 years you're in the clear. So technically it wouldn't be discovered in an audit 4 years later for that individual.

Edit:
(Still wouldn't do it, I don't condone this).