e + m

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

bedrock

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
8,118
Reaction score
5,886
I admit that I’ve been using the previous e/m standards when billing which isn’t great. Cigna decided this week to start regularly audit e+m codes nationwide. 10% of our practice is Cigna so it’s important I don’t get burned here.

Can someone help me with a very simple list of bullet points of the most recent revision in e+m billing guidelines that I need to include with documentation for e+m codes on level 3, 4, 5 on new and f/u patients?
 
see attachments
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 9.21.15 PM.png
    Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 9.21.15 PM.png
    397.1 KB · Views: 145
  • Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 9.21.23 PM.png
    Screenshot 2025-07-15 at 9.21.23 PM.png
    410.3 KB · Views: 144
I admit that I’ve been using the previous e/m standards when billing which isn’t great. Cigna decided this week to start regularly audit e+m codes nationwide. 10% of our practice is Cigna so it’s important I don’t get burned here.

Can someone help me with a very simple list of bullet points of the most recent revision in e+m billing guidelines that I need to include with documentation for e+m codes on level 3, 4, 5 on new and f/u patients?
1: Dude, it's been 4 years.
2: You're in for some pleasant surprises. The new EM format is so much better than the old one, and there's so much less documentation required. ROS doesn't matter at all anymore. You don't need to document crap like onset, timing, etc for the sake of billing. It's really a nice change. You just need to wrap your head around the "best 2 out of 3 column" concept. Pain is easy though. You will almost never use column 2, so you can just focus on maxing 1 and 3.
 
1: Dude, it's been 4 years.
2: You're in for some pleasant surprises. The new EM format is so much better than the old one, and there's so much less documentation required. ROS doesn't matter at all anymore. You don't need to document crap like onset, timing, etc for the sake of billing. It's really a nice change. You just need to wrap your head around the "best 2 out of 3 column" concept. Pain is easy though. You will almost never use column 2, so you can just focus on maxing 1 and 3.
Never use column 2? I always review data and or order data to meet a level 4. “Independent interpretation of MRI or X-rays” all day long
 
If you text/call/talk to spine surgeon about patient it's an easy column 2 moderate/level 4 check box as well.
Agree and I call radiologists all the time to talk about their MRI findings. Boom level 4 middle column
 
easiest, but is it appropriate?

the benchmarks suggest that around half of our coding should be level 3s.

it doesnt sound like that is what some people on this forum are doing.

ortho apparently does 51-60% level 3s.

noninvasive cardiology is 53-64% level 4s.


i dont have MGMA access.

 
easiest, but is it appropriate?

the benchmarks suggest that around half of our coding should be level 3s.

it doesnt sound like that is what some people on this forum are doing.

ortho apparently does 51-60% level 3s.

noninvasive cardiology is 53-64% level 4s.


i dont have MGMA access.

Ortho also has high productivity cases and don’t have to care about documenting well to meet level 4s to pick up the crumbs. Can’t comment on cardiology.
 
easiest, but is it appropriate?

the benchmarks suggest that around half of our coding should be level 3s.

it doesnt sound like that is what some people on this forum are doing.

ortho apparently does 51-60% level 3s.

noninvasive cardiology is 53-64% level 4s.


i dont have MGMA access.

Do you drive 1 MPH under the posted speed limit in the left lane next to a semi to ensure the 12 cars behind you don't exceed the speed limit?

If you do the work and document according to the expectations for a level 4, you should bill a level 4. If you bill a level a 3 while doing/documenting level 4 work, you are also committing fraud.

Your complex patient population certainly justifies greater than average number of level 4 visits.

Matching a benchmark is nonsense.
 
Do you drive 1 MPH under the posted speed limit in the left lane next to a semi to ensure the 12 cars behind you don't exceed the speed limit?

If you do the work and document according to the expectations for a level 4, you should bill a level 4. If you bill a level a 3 while doing/documenting level 4 work, you are also committing fraud.

Your complex patient population certainly justifies greater than average number of level 4 visits.

Matching a benchmark is nonsense.
Here’s a snippet of my latest feedback from coding.

Several were bumped from 3 to 4, none down coded. Clearly, I didn’t know about the 96127, which is 0.16 wRVUs if applicable.

IMG_2220.jpeg
 
Here’s a snippet of my latest feedback from coding.

Several were bumped from 3 to 4, none down coded. Clearly, I didn’t know about the 96127, which is 0.16 wRVUs if applicable.

View attachment 406773
You’re doing a lot of G2211. Are these mostly opioid patients or do use it on repeat injection patients
 
Last edited:
What is 96127?
Is that allowed as a specialist?
Yes....it is a code for a patient doing screening....

If appropriate you can bill 96127 for depression screening inventories and another 96127 -59 for anxiety screening inventories if you are giving them.

Net pay is about $10 combined for both.


The appropriate ICD 10 code is Z13.31 and Z13.39 if you are doing both.


For those of you on an RVU model neither of these codes have a physician work RVU (it is 0.00) so your hospital or group may not gave you any "credit" for using these codes, Just FYI.
 
Yes....it is a code for a patient doing screening....

If appropriate you can bill 96127 for depression screening inventories and another 96127 -59 for anxiety screening inventories if you are giving them.

Net pay is about $10 combined for both.


The appropriate ICD 10 code is Z13.31 and Z13.39 if you are doing both.


For those of you on an RVU model neither of these codes have a physician work RVU (it is 0.00) so your hospital or group may not gave you any "credit" for using these codes, Just FYI.
What’s appropriate for screening? I assume everyone that walks through the door

What is the screening questionare people are using for depression and anxiety and what does one do with the results?
 
How are HOPDs coding the G2211 reimbursement?
Looks like the wRVU is 0.33, but pays out $15. On average at $71/wRVU, it comes out to be $23.43, which makes it a losing proposition to hospitals.
 
Yes....it is a code for a patient doing screening....

If appropriate you can bill 96127 for depression screening inventories and another 96127 -59 for anxiety screening inventories if you are giving them.

Net pay is about $10 combined for both.


The appropriate ICD 10 code is Z13.31 and Z13.39 if you are doing both.


For those of you on an RVU model neither of these codes have a physician work RVU (it is 0.00) so your hospital or group may not gave you any "credit" for using these codes, Just FYI.
Because PHQ4 screens both anxiety and depression, can you use 96127 & 91627-59?

And is it worth doing this with the hassle of dealing with + screens?
 
Last edited:
How are HOPDs coding the G2211 reimbursement?
Looks like the wRVU is 0.33, but pays out $15. On average at $71/wRVU, it comes out to be $23.43, which makes it a losing proposition to hospitals.

I get 0.33 RVU for it at my HOPD. Hospital is aware of the slight loss, and are also aware they easily make it up in spades with the facility fees on procedures.
 
Yes....it is a code for a patient doing screening....

If appropriate you can bill 96127 for depression screening inventories and another 96127 -59 for anxiety screening inventories if you are giving them.

Net pay is about $10 combined for both.


The appropriate ICD 10 code is Z13.31 and Z13.39 if you are doing both.

How are HOPDs coding the G2211 reimbursement?
Looks like the wRVU is 0.33, but pays out $15. On average at $71/wRVU, it comes out to be $23.43, which makes it a losing proposition to hospitals.
I work at one part time and they pay it. They are generally losing money or breaking even on all E/M codes. You are there because of facility fees.
 
Because PHQ4 screens both anxiety and depression, can you use 96127 & 91627-59?

And is it worth doing this with the hassle of dealing with + screens?
Yes 96127 and then 96127 -59
Only you can anwer the hassle questions. Everything you screen has the potential to be positive and needs to be addressed/documented.

Also if you are in an HOPD, the wrvu for this code is 0.00
 
Yes 96127 and then 96127 -59
Only you can anwer the hassle questions. Everything you screen has the potential to be positive and needs to be addressed/documented.

Also if you are in an HOPD, the wrvu for this code is 0.00
How do you address a positive depression and anxiety score?
Offer therapy vs. psychiatry? Ask suicidal questions?
 
How do you address a positive depression and anxiety score?
Offer therapy vs. psychiatry? Ask suicidal questions?
If you are going to test for it, their has to be a reason, right? Even if you just refer or council. Otherwise, why are we ordering it.
 
Top