papasmurf, i agree with you completely!
why would some1 that will get accepted to say ucsf or upenn want to go to gw? it's such a waste of money for schools like that to interview people that won't come anyways. i bet a lot of those schools reject "overqualified" applicants unless they have some sort of connection to the school; i.e. maybe they were born nearby.
if you are "overqualified" and for some reason you really want to go to an unranked school, you should write a strong letter of interest to get them to consider you, imo
•••quote:•••Originally posted by Papa Smurf:
• •••quote:•••Originally posted by sandflea:
• •••quote:•••Originally posted by vyc:
•i might argue that sometimes a school will reject an applicant that they think probably applied to their school as a "back-up." if someone's stats are way too good for a school, it's likely they'll get in somewhere better and not come there anyway. i've heard strong applicants being rejected by some of these places and this could be the reason.•••••not this argument again!
it also could have been because the school didn't like their application for some reason. what's 'strong' differs from school to school and having good numbers doesn't guarantee you an interview or anything else at every school. like others have mentioned, some of these so-called back-up schools may have low accepted stats, but are heavy on legacy recruitment, or may get a TON of applications (e.g. BU, finch...).•••••It's a legit argument bro. Think about it for a second. Say every year there are 1,000 applicants with a combo of really high GPA's and MCAT's(3.8+, >35+) and great LOR's and EC's. Let's also say that all of these applicants decide to apply to NYMC, which usually gets about 10,000 applications. Do you really think NYMC is gonna just interview those 1000 with the best applications? Hell no! And why? Because they know where they stand as an institution, and they know that they have a snowball's chance in hell of recruiting these top applicants away from the other acceptances that they're bound to get. If they interviewed only those who they felt were most qualified, they'd end up with a matriculating class of maybe 50 if they're lucky. They interview a portion of the most qualified applicants, and the rest that they interview are probably those whom they feel will seriously consider matriculating if accepted. Schools hate being used as backups. It's a tremendous drain on their resources to interview all these applicants, and they're not gonna waste their time with those applicants that probably wouldn't attend if accepted anyway.•••••