• Server Updates
    We will be completing server updates between 3:00 - 6:00 AM Eastern on Wednesday, March 23. Thanks for your patience while we improve SDN!

Ecological Efficiency Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DMD-2-B

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2005
Messages
223
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I ran across this question and was wondering what you guys thought the answer was. I thought it was pretty simple till I saw I got it wrong, so I'd like to hear your strategies for attacking this one if you don't mind!

The ecological efficiency is only 5% from one trophic level to the next. For every 250 J of energy required by the secondary consumers, what is the minimum amount of energy the primary producers will have to generate?
 
250J*20= 5000J required for primary consumers
5000J*20= 100000J produced by producers

Did I do it right?
 
wlee009 said:
250J*20= 5000J required for primary consumers
5000J*20= 100000J produced by producers

Did I do it right?


why did you multiply 250J by 20? 😕
 
DMD-2-B said:
I ran across this question and was wondering what you guys thought the answer was. I thought it was pretty simple till I saw I got it wrong, so I'd like to hear your strategies for attacking this one if you don't mind!

The ecological efficiency is only 5% from one trophic level to the next. For every 250 J of energy required by the secondary consumers, what is the minimum amount of energy the primary producers will have to generate?

250 / 0.05 = 5000
5000 / 0.05 = 100000
 
keibee82 said:
250 / 0.05 = 5000
5000 / 0.05 = 100000

Yes, you did it right. I still don't really understand though. My point of confusion is why divide by .05 twice? I divided only once, thinking that 250 is the five percent that was passed down from the original 5000.

Clearly I am overlooking something. Would you mind explaining the reasoning?

Thanks! 👍
 
DMD-2-B said:
Yes, you did it right. I still don't really understand though. My point of confusion is why divide by .05 twice? I divided only once, thinking that 250 is the five percent that was passed down from the original 5000.

Clearly I am overlooking something. Would you mind explaining the reasoning?

Thanks! 👍
dividing it once only give the minimum for the primary consumer, the question wants the minimum for the primary producer.
 
Resonance said:
dividing it once only give the minimum for the primary consumer, the question wants the minimum for the primary producer.

thank you!
 
Top Bottom